View Post said:
The Drama Queen stuff is unnecessary. And it's not our business to make 'Putin go away.' What if other Nations spoke that way about our Leaders? How would we feel about that? When or if the Russian People want to dump Putin, so be it. But that's not our call. 'Regime Change' is arrogant Imperialist Bullshit. If other Nations pushed 'Regime Change' on us, we wouldn't stand for it. So why are we so arrogant?
We need to start minding our business. We have enough problems right here at home. We have no right running around the World telling other Nations who should or shouldn't be their Leaders. And besides that, we're broke. Spending several $Billion in Taxpayer Dollars on Ukraine is ludicrous. To me, it's criminal. Let's just get our cash back and move on. The Russians and Ukrainians can sort out their own problems.
The US has no right to select the leaders of foreign countries, If the Russians want Putin it is their call and should be respected.
WTF are you talking about?
I think it is pretty evident. you want the US to intervene in the affairs of Russia, and most sane people disagree with you.
The point where all people CAN influence policy and leaders regardless of nationality or standing, is being more consistent in enforcing laws respecting people's consent, period.
Obama clearly does not respect the consent of political opponents, so this failure to represent all Americans in unity weakens his ability to invoke "public authority."
Even Obama's presidency is contingent on Hawaii being a state, and that involved the military takeover by minority immigrants to override the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Hawaii to force capitulation and annexation, still contested to this day. President Grover Cleveland recognized that this seizure and annexation of Hawaii was in violation of international laws; and Congress passed a resolution apologizing for the illegal acts and genocide against the Hawaiian natives and descendants.
You can argue that protection of Hawaii as a US state is necessary for national security and interests. That is hardly different from Russia claiming Crimea for similar political reasons.
NOTE: For issues like this, with smaller states caught in between political conflicts of larger countries seeking control for their own interests, I would recommend a policy of "dual" citizenship that recognizes the autonomy of the actual residents affected, and allows them to choose citizenship under one or both countries equally, where all policies are settled by consensus, not by political coercion or military force. Perhaps the region in question could be recognized as a sovereign city state, and "rent" land to the countries who want to share political presence and control; under the agreement that all decisions are made by consensus, so the region is not abused for military aggression or political oppression (including reaping the economic benefits, and using that upper hand to keep the region under submission).
Such a set up would recognize and reward leaders who can actually orchestrate "consensus" in political relations, domestic or foreign; and would quit rewarding bullies for abusing unequal force.
If Obama wants to promote new models for government, he should start with his own domestic relations; or else he has no authority to compel others if he only wins by bullying!