Romney winning with middle-class families

[Steelplate]

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

What a Crock.....It's Republican Trickle Down policy that Busted Unions, outsourced Jobs, Gave huge tax Breaks, Relaxed Financial regulations, fight for these "not so" Free Trade Agreements.....all of which is "supposed" to be good for America....and all it's done is make more and more working people struggle to fucking survive, turned the Banking industry into a Casino, and made rich people uber-rich.

God, you people have short memories.

For some reason you people think there is no "middle class" without unions and both Obama and Clinton signed free trade agreements idiot

Never said that...but unions help make the middle class a hell of a lot bigger. Yeas...I know...Clinton, Bush II, and now Obama....it all pisses me off.

 

[Jroc]

I don't see how....he just wants to continue and even FURTHER the policies that put the Middle Class into low income workers.

Business/financial sector(playing the part of Lucy): Go ahead...kick the ball. I promise I won't pull it out from under you again!

The working people(playing the part of Charlie Brown): That's what you said before.....

Business/financial sector: This time I mean it...we'll trickle down, create real, good paying jobs, and you will thrive!

The working peopleto be continued....)

If you think it through, one of the things Romney will do first is to reinstate the drillers at sites in America. Obama put a moratorium by fiat on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, and those kinds of anti-business, anti-high-paying jobs days are numbered and hopefully will never knock on America's door again. Romney will bring back high paying jobs, and that is only one area in which he will work on pulling low-income households up to households that are higher-income households, and to make sure they get to enjoy their income by keeping taxes low as possible.

I'm inspired by assurances that employment will go up when businesses, full of confidence, will light the home fires by providing more jobs with Romney in the executive office, running our nation like a business as it has always been in the past. There will be good things for Americans with Romney.

I don't believe it....Since I was a teenager, all I have heard was if we give Big business and banking breaks, they will trickle down....When I turned 18 in 1983, I couldn't wait to cast my first presidential vote. I proudly showed my voter registration card and cast my vote that helped Ronald Reagan win his second term. I voted George Bush Twice....I did vote for Clinton for his second term....But I voted For GWB over Gore.

That was when I started to notice that for working Class stiffs like me....things weren't getting better....everything was getting more and more expensive.....stuff that we really need....housing, transportation, utilities, food.....and the stuff we could really do without were getting cheaper....electronics, entertainment, etc., and wages weren't going anywhere....I kept seeing huge gains on the news.....how all these businesses were doing great and their CEO'S were raking in ungodly sums of money....but all my friends who worked in the private sector were falling further and further behind...living paycheck to paycheck...using credit cards more and more. and being unable to save....and these people weren't frivolous...they were sincerely trying.

That was when I had a revelation.....trickle down only works when those that are doing so well actually play by the rules that they lobbied Reagan for....and they haven't. They've taken their windfalls and thumbed their noses at the American People who trusted them to do the right thing. Then Bush gave most favored Nation status to China.....a Communist Country with a horrific human rights record....and the job exodus began....I voted for Kerry in Bush's 2nd term election....and things got worse again......Then a group of right wing extremists started shouting out moderates within the party, calling them RINO'S and derided them at every turn...That's when I decided to leave the party that I was so proud to join when I was 18.

The thingsthat piss me off most about Obama? That he signed yet another, probably detrimental to American workers Free Trade Agreement. He extended the Patriot Act too....Along with signing off on that NDAA shit....

But I don't believe in trickle down anymore....it's a scam. Hey, I'd be willing to compromise on it....small businesses with 100 employees or less? Give THEM the breaks...Fuck the conglomerates...They need to be broken up....too much power, too much influence.

Gas prices and food prices are way up since Obama...Obama is for the working class? I think not..Which is why the "middle class" favor Romney

 

[freedombecki]

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

What a Crock.....It's Republican Trickle Down policy that Busted Unions, outsourced Jobs, Gave huge tax Breaks, Relaxed Financial regulations, fight for these "not so" Free Trade Agreements.....all of which is "supposed" to be good for America....and all it's done is make more and more working people struggle to fucking survive, turned the Banking industry into a Casino, and made rich people uber-rich.

God, you people have short memories.

God, you people don't dare look at Romney's jobs program. Believe in America! Go to page 58 (It says "104" at the bottom left) It shows a graph of the manufacturing crisis in America--losing a lot of union jobs in the process as well as regular jobs. Romney seems to have it in his mind to bring back jobs from overseas to America in manufacturing.

Why not just check out his jobs program. If so, I think I'm gonna faint!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The destruction of the middle class began with Reagan, because a health American middle class is the repository of moderation and classical liberalism. The corporatists and neo-cons abhor such principles.

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

 

[Jroc]

The destruction of the middle class began with Reagan, because a health American middle class is the repository of moderation and classical liberalism. The corporatists and neo-cons abhor such principles.

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

Owe...Shut up idoit..You post like your on drugs

 

[Avatar4321]

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

What a Crock.....It's Republican Trickle Down policy that Busted Unions, outsourced Jobs, Gave huge tax Breaks, Relaxed Financial regulations, fight for these "not so" Free Trade Agreements.....all of which is "supposed" to be good for America....and all it's done is make more and more working people struggle to fucking survive, turned the Banking industry into a Casino, and made rich people uber-rich.

God, you people have short memories.

That's probably because most people dont remember absolute nonsense.

 

[Avatar4321]

Romney's energy policy alone should win all Americans despite what income they might make.

It makes sense to develop our own energy resources instead of the government preventing them and driving up costs.

It makes sense not to have policies that would force our energy costs to "necessarily skyrocket" as the President wants.

It makes sense to have policies that strengthen the dollar rather than making it worthless.

It makes sense to stop burdening businesses and driving them over seas only to whine and complain about it and suggest fixing it with MORE regulations rather than just eliminating the artificial costs the government created in the first place.

It makes sense to allow people to keep their own money and let them make their own decisions on what to do with it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You have nothing to offer that you are correct.

The health of the middle class began to decline with Reagan's presidency and was badly hurt by the neo-con years of 1994 to 2006.

You can't post facts, data, or analysis to shore up your assertion. It's simply stupid.

The destruction of the middle class began with Reagan, because a health American middle class is the repository of moderation and classical liberalism. The corporatists and neo-cons abhor such principles.

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

Owe...Shut up idoit..You post like your on drugs

 

[Stephanie]

The destruction of the middle class began with Reagan, because a health American middle class is the repository of moderation and classical liberalism. The corporatists and neo-cons abhor such principles.

Republicans want to help bring more people into the middle class and upper class for that matter as Reagan did. Democrats like people stuck and dependent on government.

ok jakie, who did you steal that from?

 

[Jroc]

You have nothing to offer that you are correct.

The health of the middle class began to decline with Reagan's presidency and was badly hurt by the neo-con years of 1994 to 2006.

You can't post facts, data, or analysis to shore up your assertion. It's simply stupid.

The destruction of the middle class began with Reagan, because a health American middle class is the repository of moderation and classical liberalism. The corporatists and neo-cons abhor such principles.

Owe...Shut up idoit..You post like your on drugs

This guy is a Romney guy right? Help us elect Romney...... Support Obama idiot.

REAGAN’S ECONOMIC SUCCESS

Reagan conservative policies amounted to the most successful economic experiment in world history:
•20 million new jobs were created.
•Unemployment fell to 5.3% by 1989.
•The top income tax rate was cut from 70% to 28%.
•The Reagan Recovery took off once the tax rate cuts were fully phased in.
•Total federal spending declined to 21.2% of GDP in 1989 (even with the Reagan defense buildup, which won the Cold War.)
•Eliminated price controls on oil and natural gas. Production soared, and aided by a strong dollar the price of oil declined by more than 50%.
•Real per-capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989 (meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20% in just 7 years.)
•The poverty rate declined every year from 1984 to 1989, dropping by one-sixth from its peak.
•The stock market more than tripled in value from 1980 to 1990 (a larger increase than in any previous decade.)
•The Reagan recovery started in official records in November 1982, and lasted 92 months without a recession until July 1990 (when the tax increases of the 1990 budget deal killed it.)
•During this 7-year recovery, the economy grew by almost one-third (equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany to the U.S. economy.)
•In 1984 alone real economic growth boomed by 6.8%, the highest in 50 years.
•The inflation from 1980 (in the Carter era) was reduced from 13.5% to 3.2% by 1983.
(The contractionary, tight-money policies needed to kill this inflation inexorably created the steep recession of 1981 to 1982, which is why Reagan did not suffer politically catastrophic blame for that recession.)
•The Reagan Recovery kicked off a historic 25-year economic boom (with short recessions in 1990 and 2001.)
•The period from 1982 to 2007 is the greatest period of wealth creation in the history of the planet. In 1980, the net worth–assets minus liabilities–of all U.S. households and business was $25 trillion in today’s dollars. By 2007, net worth was just shy of $57 trillion. Adjusting for inflation, more wealth was created in America in the 25-year boom than in the previous two hundred years.
•Economic growth averaged 7.1% over the first 7 quarters.

Reaganomics: The Success of President Reagan’s Economic Policies « FactReal

 

[JakeStarkey]

None of your material demonstrates the strengthing of the middle class economic health.

Our moderation and classical liberalism is rooted in our healthy middle class, not in the corporations and the upper 1%.

Now give us data that supports your position. You can't, because your assertion is false.

You have nothing to offer that you are correct.

The health of the middle class began to decline with Reagan's presidency and was badly hurt by the neo-con years of 1994 to 2006.

You can't post facts, data, or analysis to shore up your assertion. It's simply stupid.

Owe...Shut up idoit..You post like your on drugs

This guy is a Romney guy right? Help us elect Romney...... Support Obama idiot.

REAGAN’S ECONOMIC SUCCESS

Reagan conservative policies amounted to the most successful economic experiment in world history:
•20 million new jobs were created.
•Unemployment fell to 5.3% by 1989.
•The top income tax rate was cut from 70% to 28%.
•The Reagan Recovery took off once the tax rate cuts were fully phased in.
•Total federal spending declined to 21.2% of GDP in 1989 (even with the Reagan defense buildup, which won the Cold War.)
•Eliminated price controls on oil and natural gas. Production soared, and aided by a strong dollar the price of oil declined by more than 50%.
•Real per-capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989 (meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20% in just 7 years.)
•The poverty rate declined every year from 1984 to 1989, dropping by one-sixth from its peak.
•The stock market more than tripled in value from 1980 to 1990 (a larger increase than in any previous decade.)
•The Reagan recovery started in official records in November 1982, and lasted 92 months without a recession until July 1990 (when the tax increases of the 1990 budget deal killed it.)
•During this 7-year recovery, the economy grew by almost one-third (equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany to the U.S. economy.)
•In 1984 alone real economic growth boomed by 6.8%, the highest in 50 years.
•The inflation from 1980 (in the Carter era) was reduced from 13.5% to 3.2% by 1983.
(The contractionary, tight-money policies needed to kill this inflation inexorably created the steep recession of 1981 to 1982, which is why Reagan did not suffer politically catastrophic blame for that recession.)
•The Reagan Recovery kicked off a historic 25-year economic boom (with short recessions in 1990 and 2001.)
•The period from 1982 to 2007 is the greatest period of wealth creation in the history of the planet. In 1980, the net worth–assets minus liabilities–of all U.S. households and business was $25 trillion in today’s dollars. By 2007, net worth was just shy of $57 trillion. Adjusting for inflation, more wealth was created in America in the 25-year boom than in the previous two hundred years.
•Economic growth averaged 7.1% over the first 7 quarters.

Reaganomics: The Success of President Reagan’s Economic Policies « FactReal

 

[NYcarbineer]

We took a special look at middle-class voters, and middle-class families in particular, in this latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll and found that not to be the case. In fact, on every measure it is Romney who is winning the battle for the support of middle-class families.

Overall, Obama leads Romney by just 3 points on the ballot (50 percent to 47 percent) – which before we rounded up, is actually a 2.6 point lead and only up a half-a-percentage point from the 2.1 point lead for Obama in our last Battleground poll in early August. In our latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll with middle-class families, which comprise about 54 percent of the total American electorate and usually split in their vote behavior between Republicans and Democrats, Romney holds a 14-point advantage (55 percent to 41 percent). Middle-class families are more inclined to believe the country is on the wrong track (34 percent right direction, 62 percent wrong track), are more likely to hold an unfavorable view of Obama (48 percent favorable, 51 percent unfavorable), and hold a more favorable view of Romney (51 percent favorable, 44 percent unfavorable) and Paul Ryan (46 percent favorable, 35 percent unfavorable) than the overall electorate. These middle-class families also hold a majority disapproval rating on the job Obama is doing as president (45 percent approve, 54 percent disapprove), and turn even more negative toward Obama on specific areas; the economy 56 percent disapprove; spending 61 percent disapprove; taxes, 53 percent disapprove; Medicare 48 percent disapprove; and even foreign policy 50 percent disapprove.

Republican poll analysis: Romney winning with middle-class families - Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber - POLITICO.com

This grasp at a straw was already posted.

Notice that it's a 'Republican analysis'. AKA propaganda.

I hear Romney's also winning with Mormons.