I mean Roe created a federal constitutional right that isn’t remotely supported by the Constitution.
Dobbs corrected that mistake, noting that there never has been and never was a federal Constitutional right and there is no justification in the Constitution for creating one.
That is overturning, it was baseless and stupid and should have been overturned, it is fantastic that Roe is gone.
Which means that yes, per the 10th Amendment, the matter is up to the people of each state, and federal politicians should shut up about abortion aside from 1) banning it in federal territory, 2) continuing to vote for literate, non-activist SCOTUS members who will keep Dobbs in place and hopeful overturn more “privacy” bullshit lies, and 3) voting for a Constitutional Amendment to ban abortion nationwide.
The issue seems to be this - No one likes to look as if they are doing something wrong, so when everyone is forced by government to accept the thing that only some (once a few, but then multiplying into many over the year's), are now wrongfully and readily engaging in, then it cloak's the one's engaging in the thing that is wrong when government gets involved, otherwise government causes an appearance that suggest everyone agrees as if what is done is right, yet only if it forces everyone to agree with it.
Let's say that a state is engaging in what most people see as very unethical wrongful deeds, otherwise that are allowed in that state.
Then if you have 3 state's surrounding that state in which doesn't allow that wrong to go on in their state, then what happens next maybe ?
1. It shine's the spotlight on that state, and the wrong that is being allowing to go on there. They hate that.
The negative result's are next.
2. If the people living within the state aren't engaging in the wrong, and so they as individual's haven't decided to allow the wrong to go on if they have a say in it, then they might want to exit the state in search of state's that aren't willfully allowing the wrong to go on in the other state's next door to them.
3. Loss of citizen's, revenue, and respect will be the result of the spotlight shinning brightly on the one state that is engaging in what most people think is wrongful deeds and policies, otherwise if all these other state's aren't drug into it somehow with them by the force of the Federal government operating outside of it's purpose and boundaries when engaging in such a way.
This is why there is this great struggle by those who want to force all state's to conform under pressure of the Federal government, to then remove the spotlight from them by placing it on all the state's across the board equally for this type of wrong, otherwise as if they were these willing and freely compliant states also, but in retrospect it was by the gun point of a federal government that forced them to succumb to a minority of individuals who gathered themselves into group's in order to fool the Fed's by appearing larger than they are, and forcing the feds into using a blanketing or rather a broad brush on it's enemies by making them think that it's these most powerful, and one's that many in number will somehow hurt the government officials chances of being re-elected if the government doesn't help to cover up the bull crap by lumping everyone into the mix equally through the use of force and/or through intimidation..
Individualism should be supported in America, and character as well, not blanketing and painting everything with a broad brush.
