Roe overturned

[usmcstinger]

The Abortion issue is not delineated in the Constitution. Therefore the Federal Government has no power over abortions or marriages etc..

 

[woodwork201]

I might have to tune into MSNBC to watch the meltdown

We went there almost immediately on the announcement.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Now it is up to the Congress to pass an Abortion law one hopefully follow along the lines:

What possible incentive does the GOP have to go along with any such law?

 

[DukeU]

The left loved the courts in the past election, when they changed election laws....ILLEGALLY.

All of a sudden we have activists on the court. Suck it up.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

More liberal lies. If it was really a Constitutional right it couldn't be overturned. Liberals are ignorant.

What stuns me is how many ignorant leftists actually think this ruling will make abortion illegal.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If you’re gay, you can just marry and live in a blue state that allows for it. Problem solved.

if you are black, you can just marry and live in a blue state that allows for it.

Problems solved.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Somethings cannot be limited to the state level. If a married couple moves from one state to another and then POOF they are no longer married that is problem.

Thing is, that will never happen. Ever. You are crafting this slippery slope of an argument that contends marriage rights of every kind (regular, gay, interracial) could be (or will be) overturned using the same logic used to overturn Roe.

But the 10th Amendment allows the states to regulate abortion and marriage. So, the federal government should enact its own marriage and abortion laws if they want the states to butt out. But that will never happen either, due to the unsolvable political dynamics of American politics.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And interracial marriage.

The "so" is that if a legally married couple in one state goes to another state and they are no longer viewed as married then that is a real problem.

If you are married in one state, the other states recognize the marriage under the doctrine of comity.

 

[basquebromance]

Rep. Maxine Waters: “To hell with the Supreme Court … we will defy them.”

 

[scruffy]

The institutional legitimacy of the SC is now shattered.

lol

Why? Because a bunch of pouting two year old lefties didn't get their way?

THE ADULTS ARE BACK IN CHARGE.

Thank God

It has become an extension of political parties.

Fucking asswipe leftist agitator. ^^^

Ironically, with Repubs being in the minority, and the SC being populated by 3 justices nominated by a prez who did not win the majority of votes. It's called the tyranny of the minority.

It is called ADHERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, leftist fucktard.

If you want to change it you can do so, but you must do so ACCORDING TO THE AGREED UPON RULES

 

[Rogue AI]

Why wouldn't they?



Somethings cannot be limited to the state level. If a married couple moves from one state to another and then POOF they are no longer married that is problem.

Why is that a problem? A license to practice law does not transfer from state to state, nor do many other licenses, like CCW. reconcile those matters first, or you folks come off as hypocrites on an issue by issue basis.

 

[rightwinger]

You have missed the entire point of the ruling. The Supreme Court doesn't get to make law - not pro-abortion or anti-abortion. The Federal government, Congress, doesn't get to make that law.

The fight is not over, though. This is really just the beginning. The fight must, and will, continue until there is a constitutional amendment banning all abortions.

The court kicked the can from the Supreme Court to 50 states

Each state will now run partisan opinions on whether Abortion should be allowed

Political power will determine

 

[woodwork201]

Now it is up to the Congress to pass an Abortion law one hopefully follow along the lines:

Such a law would be overturned as well. Apparently you missed the ruling: Abortion is not in the purview of the Federal Government.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Why wouldn't they?

The 10th Amendment. Allowing the states to regulate the issue does not mean the right in question is being revoked.

 

[martybegan]

Why wouldn't they?



Somethings cannot be limited to the state level. If a married couple moves from one state to another and then POOF they are no longer married that is problem.

Marriages are handled by the full faith and credit provision of the Constitution, much like Driver's Licenses and ownership of mobile property.

What should have happened with Obgerfell is States could not be forced to ISSUE same sex marriage licenses, but they could be forced to RECOGNIZE same sex marriage licenses issued in other States.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Thing is, that will never happen. Ever.

The same thing was said about RvW just 5 years ago. And here we are.

You are crafting this slippery slope of an argument that contends marriage rights of every kind (regular, gay, interracial) could be (or will be) overturned using the same logic used to overturn Roe.

Tell that to Justice Thomas who has already brought up doing so.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The court kicked the can from the Supreme Court to 50 states

Each state will now run partisan opinions on whether Abortion should be allowed

Political power will determine

The pall of your ignorance has lifted. You finally got the picture. Good for you.

 

[martybegan]

Such a law would be overturned as well. Apparently you missed the ruling: Abortion is not in the purview of the Federal Government.

100%, I would be against a national law either banning or protecting abortion.

At the federal level something either side wanted would have to be through the amendment process.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[g5000]

I expect this will increase Democratic voter turnout in November.