Well,maybe you were in a comma,but we all knew stop was colluding with WikiLeaks and the Russians 2 years ago. So yes, i am right.
And, during your coma, the Russian spy front account guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the WikiLeaks dump.
Nope. No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia. Many have been bamboozled by the media and politicians into thinking so. Besides, did you forget that Rosenstein stated that no evidence that any votes were affected or changed by this so called Russian hacking?
That is a counter argument coming from an idiot that has no relevancy. The conspiracy to collude has been proven, making it an illegal election. Vote counts are not part of this conspiracy.
Ha ha ha. You are a joke and an ignoramus infected with Trump derangement syndrome.
The Senate just concluded its investigation that they found no evidence with respect to collusion, and Mueller will most likely find the same.
Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia
The Senate has not concluded its investigation. The senate has not uncovered any "direct evidence". There is however a mountain of "circumstantial evidence". Do you know the difference?" Direct evidence" from almost all investigations never comes from "direct evidence". "Circumstantial evidence" carries the same weight. But Trump's stooges on this board don't have any idea what the two mean. Which is a good thing, because it throws them off course between reality and fantasy.
And by the way, the Senate Intel committee is not privy to near the info SC has. So yea, Burr is right from his investigation, but he foolishly made a mistake by trying to rap it up in lieu of this breaking news. However, in Burr's defense, it would be unlikely the senate intel would ever have "direct evidence" without all the intelligence Mueller has any way. Burr, with what he has available, can only go to circumstantial anyway. And remember, Burr never said there wasn't circumstantial evidence of a conspiracy to collude.
