Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then you have no business being on a jury. Also a child should not be illegally arming himself and inserting himself into a violent riot which was none of his business in the first place.
I agree, but the law became very important to the Pelosi secrecy club when they could manilulate power into harassing their political rival, President Donald Trump, using 20 compromised lawyers into destroying each and every good thing his administration. They even stalked him, his staff, and people who stood up for him using Maxine Waters do do the dirty and would effectively scream "racism" at anybody who challenged Maxine Waters for each and every act of stalking her charges committed. Democrats drilled this somewhat anal behavior into the ground and set their highest goal as getting rid of the Constitution so they could permanently remove the common man's rights to bear arms against bad government like the one Nancy Pelosi created when she announced that she was the most powerful woman in history as Speaker and proceeded to abuse this power by delivering legislation a ream of legal paper in length and a 24 hour time for the opposition to read and analyze the evil communist infringements on the ordinary American's Bill of Rights protections to make her more powerful yet. She even had gold pen gifts made up to celebrate her phony baloney impeachment of President Trump that drug on for his entire four years that ended up with his expulsion from the Presidency by means of an election drained of all integrity by nefariously exercising Democrat majority states and precinct overlords to count drummed up "mail in" votes all of which would exceed the dates of legal finality even though the count of these phony baloney votes was just enough to deny recounts in most states if not the nation.Law means nothing to the Marxist Democrats today.
We have the Demonrats expropriation of the constitution's protections for all this wickedness that amounts to trying a person twice in the press and banking on time to cause people to forget the details hidden by the compromised leftist press they are using to put the communist pox on the United States of America. The Democrats have turned their offices into Royalty complete with a gentry of protected fellow criminals who stalk conservative Republicans with calumny and malice aforethought. I could hurl.Curfew only applies to Rittenhouse, apparently.
Yes, there's alway a reason certain conduct is illegal. I never addressed the issue of trying him as an adult. Can you guys ever address my actual comments ?The only reason the gun was illegal, was because he was a "Child". And now you are going to try him as an adult and give him adult time, if you can....
And you're ok with that.
And young MEN taking initiative to protect their community when order is breaking down, that is a GOOD thing.
When young MEN just sit back and watch society burn, that is when societies die.
I do believe citizens have the right to protect their property. Rittenhouse wasn't doing that. His parents home was not in need of being protecting. He placed himself in a violent situation which was none of his business. He acted stupidly and impulsively.Do you believe that citizens have a right to protect their property?
Do you believe that Rittenhouse should be charged for shooting his attackers? If so, why?
Great post!The only reason the gun was illegal, was because he was a "Child". And now you are going to try him as an adult and give him adult time, if you can....
And you're ok with that.
And young MEN taking initiative to protect their community when order is breaking down, that is a GOOD thing.
When young MEN just sit back and watch society burn, that is when societies die.
You're irrational. I hope you don't serve on juries.I do believe citizens have the right to protect their property. Rittenhouse wasn't doing that. His parents home was not in need of being protecting. He placed himself in a violent situation which was none of his business. He acted stupidly and impulsively.
Yes, I think he should be charged. I've already explained why
How is my position irrational? What's irrational is condoning an unqualified, untrained and immature teenager illegally arming himself and acting as a vigilante.You're irrational. I hope you don't serve on juries.
Kyle volunteered to clean up graffiti, protect private property and thwarted an arsonist and was violently accosted and he protected himself. And you want him prosecuted? Amazing.How is my position irrational? What's irrational is condoning an unqualified, untrained and immature teenager illegally arming himself and acting as a vigilante.
That's what they do in places like Somalia.
Looks like Kyle is going to stand trial for his alleged crimes:
Kyle Rittenhouse — the 17-year-old charged with killing two people during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, after the shooting of Jacob Blake — will stand trial on charges of felony homicide and other crimes, a court commissioner ruled Thursday.
During a preliminary hearing at Kenosha County Circuit Court, which was held via video link, commissioner Loren Keating ruled that there was enough evidence to send Rittenhouse to trial over the Aug. 25 killings of Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26.
Rittenhouse also faces charges of possession of a dangerous weapon while under the age of 18 and felony attempted homicide for injuring a third man, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Lawyers for Rittenhouse argued that the teen, who has been praised by right-wing commentators and viewed sympathetically by the Trump administration, had acted in self-defense when he opened fire.
But Keating said those arguments were issues for trial — not a preliminary hearing. The teen’s lawyers also asked Keating to dismiss two charges, including possession of a dangerous weapon, but the commissioner declined, saying that was also an issue for trial.
Rittenhouse, of Antioch, Illinois, was released on $2 million bond last month, money mostly raised by conservatives through a legal defense fund.
And in related news..the 19yo who posed as a straw buyer for Kyle's gun has been charged:
19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse
The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.www.nbcnews.com
Charges have been filed against a 19-year-old man who prosecutors allege purchased and supplied the gun used by 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse in the fatal shootings of two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.
According to the criminal complaint, Black enlisted the help of Rittenhouse in guarding the Kenosha car dealership Car Source from property damage and looting. The complaint stated Black “volunteered to go out after curfew” and “asked Mr. Rittenhouse to join him.”
In interviews, the owner of Car Source has denied requesting help from either Black or Rittenhouse in protecting his dealership during the protests.
He placed himself into a violent situation which he had no business getting involved with. He acted stupidly. SomethKyle volunteered to clean up graffiti, protect private property and thwarted an arsonist and was violently accosted and he protected himself. And you want him prosecuted? Amazing.
So citizens should do nothing while arsonists set a city on fire. I guess we can agree to disagree.He placed himself into a violent situation which he had no business getting involved with. He acted stupidly. Someth
LOLYou lying asshole.
You can kill anyone who assaults you or threatens to assault you.
You recall the guy who's arm was blown off, put the gun away.
Lol that didn't happen.Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum in the back as he laid face down on the ground.
We should not be encouraging teenagers to act as vigilantes.So citizens should do nothing while arsonists set a city on fire. I guess we can agree to disagree.
"As Rittenhouse tried to go and tell the police what had happened..."Rittenhouse was volunteering to remove graffiti from walls vandalized by BLM. Thereafter, he and other volunteers stayed on-site to protect the property from additional vandalization. Rittenhouse saw a BLM member commit arson and he went and put out the fire. For that, he was threatened and then chased. Rittenhouse didn't "stand his ground"; he fled. The BLM arsonist gave chase and continued to chase him in spite of Rittenhouse having a rifle around his shoulder. And then there were gunshots and Rittenhouse was afraid that someone was shooting at him and so he turned around to see who might be shooting at him. His pursuer then caught up to Rittenhouse and was then shot.
As Rittenhouse tried to go and tell the police what had happened, more BLM members attacked him. One hit him over his head with a skateboard and Rittenhouse shot him in return. Another BLM supporter pulled a gun in order to shoot Rittenhouse point-blank but instead got his bicep blown off. Rittenhouse could have shot him again, but did not.
Do you believe that Rittenhouse should be charged for shooting his attackers? If so, why?
LOLLol that didn't happen.
abc11.com
Rittenhouse wasn't protecting his property.Do you believe that citizens have a right to protect their property?
Do you believe that Rittenhouse should be charged for shooting his attackers? If so, why?
I think he's likelyi to be convicted of a lesser homicide charge.They liberals may get him on the weapons charge
but otherwise not guilty
