The Clinton Foundation is a missionary society that converts infidels to Socialism in the same way Christian missionary societies converted Chinese to Christianity throughout China in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Large numbers of converts meant success which, in turn, meant more money in VOLUNTARY donations back in a society’s homeland.
Left-leaning (read Communist) authors back in the early days of undermining Christianity often used the phrase “Rice Christians” to disparage Christianity. That term referred to those Chinese converts who converted because Christian Missionary Societies bribed them with rice.
Parenthetically, the Boxers would not have been so determined to eliminate Christian teaching if missionary societies were not becoming so influential. No doubt there were many Rice Christians in famine-plagued China, but not enough to diminish the tremendous influence Christianity was having in China at the time.
NOTE: Hillary’s new campaign theme:
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...PlFhUzvdcfy8X9o308qyv72ilycNWTt4Qi-6i0vNslo3Q
clearly shows a similarity between protecting millions of illegal immigrants and China’s:
The main difference between those early Christians who funded missionaries, and Clinton Foundation donors is that the latter pass their “donations” onto everybody else through charitable tax deductions. In effect, they turn their generosity into an INVOLUNTARY donation for everybody else. Surely, the Clintons begin and end every prayer with the words “God bless America’s tax code.”
Socialists will continue to get away with using tax dollars to promote their religion over every other religion because Socialism has never been legally defined, or even recognized, as a religion. Because Socialism is not viewed as a religion, this allows the Socialist/Communist priesthood to abuse the First Amendment without fear of cynics saying the pot calls the kettle black.
Political realities also allow American Communists/Socialists to proselytize internationally in much the same way they do here at home. By that I mean that Third World poor will become Rice Socialists in the same way missionary societies transformed so many nonbelievers into Rice Christians.
Bottom line: Missionaries used voluntary contributions in order to elicit pagan fidelity to Christianity, while Socialists/Communists use coerced tax dollars for religious alterations. The word “voluntary” does not exist in Socialism’s/Communism’s dictionary.
I would be remiss if I failed to point out that tax dollars funding United Nations propaganda is essential. If worldwide rice conversion is going to work, private sector Americans must relinquish their individual wealth after the United Nations has the authority to tax in its hands on top of surrendering their individual liberties. The latter has been nibbling away since 1945.
At the very least, American working men and women will see a substantial portion of their labors going abroad to support totalitarian regimes friendly to democracy throughout the world. Whether or not you believe in Socialism/Communism your tax dollars will be used to bring others into religion’s tent.
It will get worse after a universal currency is put in place. Then the value of all skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled American private sector labor will be determined by the lowest global common denominator if it retains any worth at all. Overcrowded Third World countries will not, cannot, be brought up to American standards, but rather American private sector workers will have their living standards lowered until every private sector worker will be equally underpaid; most especially those men and women who work with their hands.
Socialists do the same thing with tax dollars that missionary societies did with voluntary contributions in China. The loyalty of the poor is still bought and paid for with “rice” in welfare states, while the Socialist priesthood confiscates tax dollars by force to enrich themselves. There is no rice for the people at the top of the tax dollar pyramid —— they demand lobster and steak; so it can be said with some degree of accuracy they are Surf ‘n’ Turf Socialists.
Finally, the XVI Amendment (1913) provided the machinery Socialists needed to proselytize without being required to defend their religion.
Obviously, nobody will donate to Socialism’s priesthood. No matter. As it stands now Socialists will continue to feed on tax dollars for as long as they avoid the label of an organized religion. In addition, Socialists can proselytize with tax dollars. They only have to deny that Socialism is a religion.
The fact is that Socialism would die on the vine if Socialists had to compete on a level playing field. So they tilted the playing field in their favor in order to acquire the do-gooder reputation of traditional priests without running afoul of the First Amendment. Forcing Americans to support Socialism’s questionable “good works” was the only way the Socialist priesthood could get the respect generally accorded to men of the cloth. The XVI Amendment filled every need.
Left-leaning (read Communist) authors back in the early days of undermining Christianity often used the phrase “Rice Christians” to disparage Christianity. That term referred to those Chinese converts who converted because Christian Missionary Societies bribed them with rice.
Parenthetically, the Boxers would not have been so determined to eliminate Christian teaching if missionary societies were not becoming so influential. No doubt there were many Rice Christians in famine-plagued China, but not enough to diminish the tremendous influence Christianity was having in China at the time.
NOTE: Hillary’s new campaign theme:
clearly shows a similarity between protecting millions of illegal immigrants and China’s:
I Ho Ch'uan... literally denotes the 'Fists' (Ch'uan) of Righteousness (or Public) (I) Harmony (Ho), in apparent allusion to the strength of united force which was to be put forth. As the Chinese phrase 'fists and feet' signifies boxing and wrestling, there appeared to be no more suitable term for the adherents of the sect than 'Boxers,' a designation first used by one or two missionary correspondents of foreign journals in China, and later universally accepted on account of the difficulty of coining a better one.
Boxer Rebellion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In simple terms, Hillary’s immigration policy is designed to install millions of angry immigrants, and United Nations refugees —— FISTS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS —— ready to kill Americans as well as vote for Democrats far into the future. Clinton has already promised to pick up where the Chicago sewer rat ends off —— self-defense is immoral and un-American, unless you are defending against Americans rejecting the inevitability of Socialism. Boxer Rebellion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The main difference between those early Christians who funded missionaries, and Clinton Foundation donors is that the latter pass their “donations” onto everybody else through charitable tax deductions. In effect, they turn their generosity into an INVOLUNTARY donation for everybody else. Surely, the Clintons begin and end every prayer with the words “God bless America’s tax code.”
Socialists will continue to get away with using tax dollars to promote their religion over every other religion because Socialism has never been legally defined, or even recognized, as a religion. Because Socialism is not viewed as a religion, this allows the Socialist/Communist priesthood to abuse the First Amendment without fear of cynics saying the pot calls the kettle black.
Political realities also allow American Communists/Socialists to proselytize internationally in much the same way they do here at home. By that I mean that Third World poor will become Rice Socialists in the same way missionary societies transformed so many nonbelievers into Rice Christians.
Bottom line: Missionaries used voluntary contributions in order to elicit pagan fidelity to Christianity, while Socialists/Communists use coerced tax dollars for religious alterations. The word “voluntary” does not exist in Socialism’s/Communism’s dictionary.
I would be remiss if I failed to point out that tax dollars funding United Nations propaganda is essential. If worldwide rice conversion is going to work, private sector Americans must relinquish their individual wealth after the United Nations has the authority to tax in its hands on top of surrendering their individual liberties. The latter has been nibbling away since 1945.
At the very least, American working men and women will see a substantial portion of their labors going abroad to support totalitarian regimes friendly to democracy throughout the world. Whether or not you believe in Socialism/Communism your tax dollars will be used to bring others into religion’s tent.
It will get worse after a universal currency is put in place. Then the value of all skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled American private sector labor will be determined by the lowest global common denominator if it retains any worth at all. Overcrowded Third World countries will not, cannot, be brought up to American standards, but rather American private sector workers will have their living standards lowered until every private sector worker will be equally underpaid; most especially those men and women who work with their hands.
Socialists do the same thing with tax dollars that missionary societies did with voluntary contributions in China. The loyalty of the poor is still bought and paid for with “rice” in welfare states, while the Socialist priesthood confiscates tax dollars by force to enrich themselves. There is no rice for the people at the top of the tax dollar pyramid —— they demand lobster and steak; so it can be said with some degree of accuracy they are Surf ‘n’ Turf Socialists.
Finally, the XVI Amendment (1913) provided the machinery Socialists needed to proselytize without being required to defend their religion.
Obviously, nobody will donate to Socialism’s priesthood. No matter. As it stands now Socialists will continue to feed on tax dollars for as long as they avoid the label of an organized religion. In addition, Socialists can proselytize with tax dollars. They only have to deny that Socialism is a religion.
The fact is that Socialism would die on the vine if Socialists had to compete on a level playing field. So they tilted the playing field in their favor in order to acquire the do-gooder reputation of traditional priests without running afoul of the First Amendment. Forcing Americans to support Socialism’s questionable “good works” was the only way the Socialist priesthood could get the respect generally accorded to men of the cloth. The XVI Amendment filled every need.
