Responsibility of war crimes in Syria

[Meane]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

Looks to me like you drank the AP Kool-Aid. The AP is lying.

"He used chemical weapons on his people"

How many times has that trick been pulled just before some hare-brained "regime-change" plot?

Saddam Hussein
Ghaddafi
Assad

No, the problem is the rebels and the US (under Obama) funding and arming
the rebels.

The Turks aren't helping either. Assad and Russia are establishing safe zones for the people.

Syrians support Assad.

Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele

Syrian election shows depth of popular support for Assad, even among Sunni majority

It's not the Syrian army beheading Christian children, in fact they're losing life and limb to save them.

It's the rebels taking over towns and committing mass murder.

2015
www.washingtonpost.com/world/new-us-turkey-plan-amounts-to-a-safe-zone-in-nirthwest-syria/2015/07/26/0a533345-ff2e-4b40-858a-c1b36541e156_story.html?utm_term=.c6758cfd66fd

Turkey has been "creating a safe zone in Syria" for at least six years. Any body seen it? Let me know.

2017
www.middleeastobserver.org/2017/02/12/turkey-seeks-safe-zones-in-syria-despite-russias-refusal/

the next step is to establish a no-fly zone. Then they (the Syrians) will be able to establish their national army and feel themselves safe

-erdogan

www.arabnews.com/node/1053886

UN High Commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi was clear "frankly, I don't see in Syria the conditions to create" successful safe zones. "Let us not waste time planning safe zones that will not be set up because they will not be safe enough for people to go back. Let us concentrate on making peace so that everything becomes safe.

Assad also has rejected Trump's idea of safe zones.

Yeah, "safe zones".

 

[Marion Morrison]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

Looks to me like you drank the AP Kool-Aid. The AP is lying.

"He used chemical weapons on his people"

How many times has that trick been pulled just before some hare-brained "regime-change" plot?

Saddam Hussein
Ghaddafi
Assad

No, the problem is the rebels and the US (under Obama) funding and arming
the rebels.

The Turks aren't helping either. Assad and Russia are establishing safe zones for the people.

Syrians support Assad.

Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele

Syrian election shows depth of popular support for Assad, even among Sunni majority

It's not the Syrian army beheading Christian children, in fact they're losing life and limb to save them.

It's the rebels taking over towns and committing mass murder.

2015
www.washingtonpost.com/world/new-us-turkey-plan-amounts-to-a-safe-zone-in-nirthwest-syria/2015/07/26/0a533345-ff2e-4b40-858a-c1b36541e156_story.html?utm_term=.c6758cfd66fd

Turkey has been "creating a safe zone in Syria" for at least six years. Any body seen it? Let me know.

2017
www.middleeastobserver.org/2017/02/12/turkey-seeks-safe-zones-in-syria-despite-russias-refusal/

the next step is to establish a no-fly zone. Then they (the Syrians) will be able to establish their national army and feel themselves safe

-erdogan

www.arabnews.com/node/1053886

UN High Commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi was clear "frankly, I don't see in Syria the conditions to create" successful safe zones. "Let us not waste time planning safe zones that will not be set up because they will not be safe enough for people to go back. Let us concentrate on making peace so that everything becomes safe.

Assad also has rejected Trump's idea of safe zones.

Yeah, "safe zones".

Kill off ISIS and the rebels and the whole country is a safe zone.

 

[Meane]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

Looks to me like you drank the AP Kool-Aid. The AP is lying.

"He used chemical weapons on his people"

How many times has that trick been pulled just before some hare-brained "regime-change" plot?

Saddam Hussein
Ghaddafi
Assad

No, the problem is the rebels and the US (under Obama) funding and arming
the rebels.

The Turks aren't helping either. Assad and Russia are establishing safe zones for the people.

Syrians support Assad.

Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele

Syrian election shows depth of popular support for Assad, even among Sunni majority

It's not the Syrian army beheading Christian children, in fact they're losing life and limb to save them.

It's the rebels taking over towns and committing mass murder.

2015
www.washingtonpost.com/world/new-us-turkey-plan-amounts-to-a-safe-zone-in-nirthwest-syria/2015/07/26/0a533345-ff2e-4b40-858a-c1b36541e156_story.html?utm_term=.c6758cfd66fd

Turkey has been "creating a safe zone in Syria" for at least six years. Any body seen it? Let me know.

2017
www.middleeastobserver.org/2017/02/12/turkey-seeks-safe-zones-in-syria-despite-russias-refusal/

the next step is to establish a no-fly zone. Then they (the Syrians) will be able to establish their national army and feel themselves safe

-erdogan

www.arabnews.com/node/1053886

UN High Commissioner for refugees Filippo Grandi was clear "frankly, I don't see in Syria the conditions to create" successful safe zones. "Let us not waste time planning safe zones that will not be set up because they will not be safe enough for people to go back. Let us concentrate on making peace so that everything becomes safe.

Assad also has rejected Trump's idea of safe zones.

Yeah, "safe zones".

Kill off ISIS and the rebels and the whole country is a safe zone.

Explain, please.

 

[Bleipriester]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

The EU has bombed Libya in support of Al-Qaeda and ISIS. 20000 Nato sorties, the majority conducted by EU-states, did not only destroy the country and the state but also left the people in the hands of Islamist terrorists. They planned the same scenario for Syria.

Sirte "liberated" by Nato

The EU is also in support of al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria. EU states support terrorist groups which they call "democratic rebels" or not and buy ISIS oil while at the same time impose sanctions on Syria.

Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

It is the same western governments and media who screamed Assad must go that now mourn the dead and blame them on the Syrian government.

 

[irosie91]

Capt blei left out the fact that the BOMBS in Libya are-----very simple ISIS bombs---
by LIBYAN ISIS. Nothing to do with the EU. The EU does some military action
against Libyan incursion into EU countries called "refugees" Libya is a HUMAN SMUGGLING nation for several purposes. The NON-LIBYAN workers (aka slaves) are desperate to get out and willing to give up whatever money they have and Libya is ALSO a conduit for the illegal transfer of other Africans desperate to cross the
Mediterranean. ----the EU is not bombing Libya but IS engaging in some military
action against the smuggling of "refugees"

 

[Meane]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

The EU has bombed Libya in support of Al-Qaeda and ISIS. 20000 Nato sorties, the majority conducted by EU-states, did not only destroy the country and the state but also left the people in the hands of Islamist terrorists. They planned the same scenario for Syria.

Sirte "liberated" by Nato

The EU is also in support of al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria. EU states support terrorist groups which they call "democratic rebels" or not and buy ISIS oil while at the same time impose sanctions on Syria.

Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

It is the same western governments and media who screamed Assad must go that now mourn the dead and blame them on the Syrian government.

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

 

[irosie91]

From European Parliamentary Research Service. Written by Patryk Pawlak

The EU has repeatedly stated that the regime bears the primary responsibility for the conflict and that it's actions fuel extremism and undermine any potential political transition. The EU has also regularly called for the regime to stop targeting civilians, halt air strikes, artillery attacks and put an immediate end to all violence.

In the Council Conclusions of 17 October 2016, adopted in response to a serious deterioration in the situation on the ground particularly in the city if Aleppo, the EU strongly condemned the disproportionate and deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian and healthcare personnel by the regime and it allies, and reiterated its firm belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict, but that a political solution must be sought. The EU also called for those responsible for war crimes in Syria to be brought to justice including by referring the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court.

It has been become a fashionable idea to take part in the war in Syria. Since Trump is into pretending to be fashionable he wants to go there too, though for the recent years US has been nagging and nagging about a "political solution".

If those guilty of war crimes were prosecuted now we would immediately get rid of Kremlin, Assad and Khameini, and if we used a bit of prediction we might as well prosecute Trump for some very bad moral intentions against human rights.

So Russia has manuvered it that all those killing in Syria are part of the conflict, those who they don't like to promote are "killing the wrong people" and those who don't take part in it militarily don't matter.

The EU has bombed Libya in support of Al-Qaeda and ISIS. 20000 Nato sorties, the majority conducted by EU-states, did not only destroy the country and the state but also left the people in the hands of Islamist terrorists. They planned the same scenario for Syria.

Sirte "liberated" by Nato

The EU is also in support of al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria. EU states support terrorist groups which they call "democratic rebels" or not and buy ISIS oil while at the same time impose sanctions on Syria.

Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

It is the same western governments and media who screamed Assad must go that now mourn the dead and blame them on the Syrian government.

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

Libya is a tribal Islamic shit hole with lots of islamist jihadi animals in PACKS.
Each pack calls the other pack something bad and "not real muslim" and
controlled by "elsewhere". Libya is an oil rich land-----lots of gold tucked away and lots of money to BUY weapons on the opened markets. -------propagandists like to look at the ORIGIN of the weapons and claim "THIS" or "THAT"
country is "FUNDING AND SUPPLYING THE TERRORISTS"-----based on the
assigned "TERRORIST GROUP OF THE DAY"

 

[Bleipriester]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

 

[Meane]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

 

[Bleipriester]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

 

[Meane]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

 

[Bleipriester]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

 

[Meane]

I tried hard to find evidence of the article offered being true and came up with middle eastern and russian propaganda. Zero proper sources.

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil

Your so called terrorist groups actually are labeled as terrorist groups by nations or organisations. So if a country, a union or an organisation does not consider a group a terrorist group then it is for them not a terrorist group. It is in fact not a universal label.

What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?

Libya is a mess, but that is not the fault of EU. And someone ought to be at war there right now because things are getting way out of hands and while people argue of ISIS in Syria it is resettling in Libya.

It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

 

[Bleipriester]

"EU Ambassador to Iraq reveals EU states purchasing oil from jihadist terror group, refuses to divulge names of states"
Supporting Terror: EU States Buying Islamic State Oil



What are you talking about? You think your holy EU can turn al-Qaeda groups into charity organizations by simply not labeling them terrorist groups?


It is the fault of all who participated and that includes the EU. They still do it:
EU´s ten points plan to reduce African immigration could benefit Al-Qaeda

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

 

[Meane]

Israelnationalnews is highly biased and often offers ideas that are doubtful.

It offers no details at all. Why would she say such a thing? Where is it reported that she did besides these propaganda sources. What if the reason we only got "said some EU states" but no reference to any and no additional information, no nothing, is that her words have been twisted out of proportional and context and that is perhaps why a single proper media outlet, as far as I can find, hasn't touched the subject with a stick?

Certainly Russia has done so with many, many terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas because those happen to go with their interests. Though, EU does consider al-Qaeda a terrorist group. As for the evidence EU supports it, you'll have to provide it.

You're directing me to your old thread..
No thanks. Try again.

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

 

[Bleipriester]

If you cannot stand others´ threads, this is wrong place for you and your EU propaganda.

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

So you have a link to Hamas asking for Russian support for a Palestinian state.

 

[Meane]

If your links would lead me to information or a well constructed explanation or anything but your propaganda, I'd look at them. But I have visited them and they have neither good links to proper sources or any believable reasoning of your own.

I already endure your illogical arguments where we're at, so why not post them here if you find them relevant? And if you understand a thing well enough you ought to be able to explain it repeatedly and shortly yourself. That you refuse adds to your unaccountability.

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

So you have a link to Hamas asking for Russian support for a Palestinian state.

Check out the second one if you're not scared.

 

[Bleipriester]

My threads are very informative and deliver the unaltered facts using proper sources. You don´t like the facts provided so you refuse to discuss and try to malign them.


"Britain, the United States, France and Ukraine blocked a Russian proposal at the United Nations to blacklist Syrian rebel groups Jaish al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham for links to Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, diplomats said on Wednesday."

U.S., Britain, France block Russia bid to blacklist Syria rebels

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

So you have a link to Hamas asking for Russian support for a Palestinian state.

Check out the second one if you're not scared.

Bullshit article.

 

[Meane]

I never refused to discuss. I'm asking you to bring the discussion "here".

Obviously. Those are the rebels. And as said, if you're upset, you ought to be equally upset about Russia refusing to blacklist Hamas and Hezbollah.

Then there's the question of "links" to ISIS. These days everyone's claimed to have links and nearly everyone denies them. It is likely some can't avoid them. For instance, were the Syrian rebels to be driven against the wall and end up fighting by ISIS against Russia, could one blame them? I really don't know, it depends.

Enemy's enemy is a friend. It isn't because we like it so but because sometimes you end up like it in need of an ally.

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

So you have a link to Hamas asking for Russian support for a Palestinian state.

Check out the second one if you're not scared.

Bullshit article.

www.euromaidanpress.com/2016/01/28/expert-putin-and-assad-support-hezbollah-terrorism/#arvlbdata

...According to the most recent information Russian officers cooperate directly with Hezbollah, delivering arms....
Last November Mikhail Bogdanov, special envoy of the Russian President for the middle East, said that Russia does not consider nor intends to consider Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organisations.

Oh, they support them.

 

[Bleipriester]

Russia does not support Hamas or Hezbollah but a lot of "EU aid" goes to Hamas. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization.

Yes, we could blame them, because they are terrorists. They are not rebels but jihadists. They slaughter people and use them as human shield.

www.pravdareport.com/world/Asia/27-02-2007-87758-hamas_russian_support-0/

a delegation of Palestinian Hamas leaders arrived in Moscow mondey to seek support for creating a Palestinian state and restore international funding.

....Russia is the only member of the middle East quartet ... which maintains ties with the Islamist group after it took over the Palestinian government last year.

www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017/02/06/russia-iran-support-restructuring-of-Hamas-in-Gaza/9991486401227/

Whether a group of terrorists is considered a terrorist organisation can be decided alone by a country, organisation or a union. Not a universal label.

So you have a link to Hamas asking for Russian support for a Palestinian state.

Check out the second one if you're not scared.

Bullshit article.

www.euromaidanpress.com/2016/01/28/expert-putin-and-assad-support-hezbollah-terrorism/#arvlbdata

...According to the most recent information Russian officers cooperate directly with Hezbollah, delivering arms....
Last November Mikhail Bogdanov, special envoy of the Russian President for the middle East, said that Russia does not consider nor intends to consider Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organisations.

Oh, they support them.

Hezbollah is the ally of Syria. They are fighting EU-Sponsored terrorism.