OK. So recent discussions have prompted me to reconsider what I think about the Constituiton. I figure I'll just post it here rather than in a thread because I think it warrants further study. I don't want to get into a debate about right or wrong but I would appreciate any references someone might have. I'm not looking at case law or settled law because I believe it is flawed. I dont' want to know what some judge 200 years later thought that something meant, I want to know what the Authors actually meant. I am aware that there are people who believe this is not a worthy cause, if you are of that opinion, please keep it to yourself or start your own thread. I just want to study what is Constitutional and what isn't. I am prejudiced, of course, because this isn't the first time I've done it. I am not prejudiced by issues though, just by procedure and the limitations and provisioned within the Constitution. Well, here goes nothing....
Mike
Mike