Republicans protected Voting Rights again today

because they don't follow Congress

they don't know
don't want to know
just want to stay Dim so they can be with the cool kids.. or something

kind of a head scratcher, actually, why anyone, esp after 2020 would be a dim.... just don't get it..

But I guess eveyrone can't be like me and have a good brain...
Why would anyone be a trumpecile after 2020?
 

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., criticized Senate Republicans after they unanimously voted to block voting rights legislation from moving to open debate. He called their actions an "implicit endorsement" of "voter suppression" laws being passed in certain states.

Senate Republicans stopped the chamber from voting on the sweeping Freedom to Vote Act Wednesday, thwarting Democratic efforts to impose new voting reforms that could combat state-level restrictions being enacted by GOP lawmakers nationwide.
The Freedom to Vote Act would have imposed such measures as mandating early voting periods and no-excuse mail-in voting, making Election Day a holiday, restoring voting rights to the formerly incarcerated, limiting how long voting lines can be, prohibiting partisan gerrymandering, making it easier to register to vote, improving election infrastructure and enacting new campaign finance reform provisions.
In light of increased threats against election workers, the bill also would have made it harder to remove election officials on partisan grounds, and would have also protected against partisan election audits by taking steps to stop ballots from being mishandled by any third-party workers that might examine them.
President Joe Biden had urged lawmakers to let the bill move forward, saying in a statement released before the vote it was “unconscionable” for Republicans to block the bill and there’s an “urgent” need to address voting rights because “democracy—the very soul of America—is at stake.”



Comment:
Chuck Schumer is a relentless liar and a perennial demagogue.
He is saying that State election laws "suppress Voting Rights.
The Democrats are not protecting Voting Rights.
The Democrats are protecting their Voter Fraud Crimes and their Ballot Rigging Crimes.
Voter ID laws protect everyone's Right to Vote from Democrats who vote multiple times.
Voter ID laws also protect everyone's Right to Vote from non-citizens who cancel out the votes of citizens.
Banning Mail-In ballots protects everyone's Right to Vote from the Democrat ballot harvesting crimes and their bogus ballot crimes.
Election Audits help uncover the Democrat election crimes.
Schumer's huge lie is that he is protecting Voting Rights and our democracy.
But the Democrat Party's election crimes and abuses of power crimes are the real threat to our democracy.
Barry Obama and Hillary Clinton's 2016 election crimes have still not been resolved.
Obama illegally used the IRS, FBI, FISA Court and DOJ as his political weapons.
Hillary Clinton paid for for the fraudulent Steele dossier.
McCabe and Schiff illegally leaked bogus information to the Press to smear Trump.
Why would anyone ever trust Chuck Schumer?

Good
 
Of course they filibustered voting rights.

And protected the "right" of "some" sates to ignore the vote of the people and send their own slate of electors to the Electoral convention
The bill is about promoting voter fraud.
 
Sounds awful!

No specifics?
Are there no new laws to suppress voting?
Sounds awful!

No specifics?
Sounds truthful, yes. Do some homework, instead of behaving like a typical tumphumper.

New Restrictive Laws​

EFFECT ON VOTINGBILL NUMBERS
Shorten window to apply for a mail ballotAL H.B. 538, AR S.B. 643, GA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, KY H.B. 574, NY S.B. 264, OK H.B. 2663
Shorten deadline to deliver mail ballotAR S.B. 643, IA S.F. 413
Make it harder to remain on absentee voting listsAZ S.B. 1485, FL S.B. 90
Eliminate or limit sending mail ballot applications to voters who do not specifically request themGA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, KS H.B. 2332, TX S.B. 1
Eliminate or limit sending mail ballots to voters who do not specifically request themFL S.B. 90
Restrict assistance in returning a voter’s mail ballotAR H.B. 1715, FL S.B. 90, IA S.F. 413, IA S.F. 568, KS H.B. 2183, KY H.B. 574, MT H.B. 530, TX S.B. 1
Limit the number, location, or availability of mail ballot drop boxesFL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, IN S.B. 398
Impose stricter signature requirements for mail ballotsAZ S.B. 1003, ID H.B. 290, KS H.B. 2183, TX S.B. 1
Impose harsher voter ID requirementsAR H.B. 1112, AR H.B. 1244, FL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202, MT S.B. 169, NH H.B. 523, TX S.B. 1, WY H.B. 75
Expand voter purges or risk faulty voter purgesAZ S.B. 1819, IA S.F. 413, KY H.B. 574, LA H.B. 167, NH S.B. 31, TX S.B. 1111, UT H.B. 12
Increase barriers for voters with disabilitiesAL H.B. 285, IA S.F. 568, TX H.B. 3920, TX S.B. 1
Ban snacks and water to voters waiting in lineFL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202
Eliminate Election Day registrationMT H.B. 176
Reduce polling place availability (locations or hours)IA S.F. 413, MT S.B. 196, TX S.B. 1
Increase number of voters per precinctNV S.B. 84
Limit early voting days or hoursGA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, TX S.B. 1
 
Voter ID Requirements are not Racist
The ultimate lie, and excuse to cheat in elections, is to say that Voter ID requirements are Racist. Sorry, but voter ID requirements are NOT Racist.

 
Wow. You are a fake news KoolAid drinker for sure.

The Dem voting rights sham fake law jammed up in the Senate has only been in the news for about a MONTH!!!!
You mean the Voting Rights Act? That isn't law, yes? I like the idea of encouraging people to vote. You? This wouldn't have been proposed if your tumphumpers in the states didn't suppress the voters.
 
He is saying that State election laws "suppress Voting Rights.
And he's right.

Texas’ largest county has rejected thousands of absentee ballots and ballot applications due to Republicans’ restrictive new voting law — and now, officials there have asked the Department of Justice for help.

The new law, SB1, is “achieving exactly what its authors set out to do: erect more hurdles in front of the ballot box and systematically suppress the vote in Harris County,” wrote the county judge, county attorney and county elections administrator in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland flagged Thursday by Houston Public Media.

Harris County, home to Houston, has for weeks sounded the alarm about early warning signs that SB1 is resulting in unusually large rates of rejected ballot applications.

The trouble comes from Republicans’ new ID requirements for people eligible to vote by mail: The form of that required ID number (whether a driver’s license number, the last four digits of a Social Security number, or state ID number) must match what the voter used to register with the state, sometimes decades earlier. Previously, absentee voters’ identities were confirmed by comparing their signatures to government records.

The results speak for themselves: Out of 33,270 mail ballot applications received by Harris County as of Feb. 15, 14% were flagged for rejection due to SB1’s new voter ID requirements, according to the county officials’ letter. And among 9,809 ballots received by the county by that date, a whopping 35.5%, or 3,491 votes, have been flagged for rejection for the same reason.
 
thank goodness!

this is the leftist attempt to federalize all elections, undermine the Constitutional protections that allow the States to run their own elections, and lock in their power…this is the dnc’s version of the Enabling Acts in Germany
Another funny and irrational remark by Struth.
 
And he's right.

Texas’ largest county has rejected thousands of absentee ballots and ballot applications due to Republicans’ restrictive new voting law — and now, officials there have asked the Department of Justice for help.

The new law, SB1, is “achieving exactly what its authors set out to do: erect more hurdles in front of the ballot box and systematically suppress the vote in Harris County,” wrote the county judge, county attorney and county elections administrator in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland flagged Thursday by Houston Public Media.

Harris County, home to Houston, has for weeks sounded the alarm about early warning signs that SB1 is resulting in unusually large rates of rejected ballot applications.

The trouble comes from Republicans’ new ID requirements for people eligible to vote by mail: The form of that required ID number (whether a driver’s license number, the last four digits of a Social Security number, or state ID number) must match what the voter used to register with the state, sometimes decades earlier. Previously, absentee voters’ identities were confirmed by comparing their signatures to government records.

The results speak for themselves: Out of 33,270 mail ballot applications received by Harris County as of Feb. 15, 14% were flagged for rejection due to SB1’s new voter ID requirements, according to the county officials’ letter. And among 9,809 ballots received by the county by that date, a whopping 35.5%, or 3,491 votes, have been flagged for rejection for the same reason.
The Democrat Party is opposed to Voting Rights.
When a Democrat votes twice, they violate everyone's Right to Vote.
Protecting the citizen's Right to Vote IS Voting Rights.
Fraudulent election tactics such as "ballot drop boxes" and no ID required, and breaking chain of custody laws, and counting ballots behind locked doors, and banning poll watchers enables the corrupt Democrats to cast multiple ballots which violates everyone's Right to Vote.
 
Are there no new laws to suppress voting?

Sounds truthful, yes. Do some homework, instead of behaving like a typical tumphumper.

New Restrictive Laws​

EFFECT ON VOTINGBILL NUMBERS
Shorten window to apply for a mail ballotAL H.B. 538, AR S.B. 643, GA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, KY H.B. 574, NY S.B. 264, OK H.B. 2663
Shorten deadline to deliver mail ballotAR S.B. 643, IA S.F. 413
Make it harder to remain on absentee voting listsAZ S.B. 1485, FL S.B. 90
Eliminate or limit sending mail ballot applications to voters who do not specifically request themGA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, KS H.B. 2332, TX S.B. 1
Eliminate or limit sending mail ballots to voters who do not specifically request themFL S.B. 90
Restrict assistance in returning a voter’s mail ballotAR H.B. 1715, FL S.B. 90, IA S.F. 413, IA S.F. 568, KS H.B. 2183, KY H.B. 574, MT H.B. 530, TX S.B. 1
Limit the number, location, or availability of mail ballot drop boxesFL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, IN S.B. 398
Impose stricter signature requirements for mail ballotsAZ S.B. 1003, ID H.B. 290, KS H.B. 2183, TX S.B. 1
Impose harsher voter ID requirementsAR H.B. 1112, AR H.B. 1244, FL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202, MT S.B. 169, NH H.B. 523, TX S.B. 1, WY H.B. 75
Expand voter purges or risk faulty voter purgesAZ S.B. 1819, IA S.F. 413, KY H.B. 574, LA H.B. 167, NH S.B. 31, TX S.B. 1111, UT H.B. 12
Increase barriers for voters with disabilitiesAL H.B. 285, IA S.F. 568, TX H.B. 3920, TX S.B. 1
Ban snacks and water to voters waiting in lineFL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202
Eliminate Election Day registrationMT H.B. 176
Reduce polling place availability (locations or hours)IA S.F. 413, MT S.B. 196, TX S.B. 1
Increase number of voters per precinctNV S.B. 84
Limit early voting days or hoursGA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, TX S.B. 1
In other words, eliminate all the principle means of committing voter fraud.
 

Forum List

Back
Top