Republicans, here is your front row to corruption

[Billiejeens]

The paragraph above:

"A Justice Department memo made public on Monday calls for federal charges to be shelved "without prejudice." That means in theory the investigation could resume at some point in the future."

That's why no finding was made on facts.
It eliminates double jeopardy or influencing a potential jury pool.

Annie is far too stupid to get it.

 

[TemplarKormac]

What isn't fact dumbass?

That a criminal case against Adams was dropped without any review of evidence? That it didn't matter to Trump's DOJ how brazen his violation of the law was?

It was dropped "without prejudice" meaning since they didn't review the evidence, that he could be legally tried again for it.

They aren't disallowing him from being charged again.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That's why no finding was made on facts.
It eliminates double jeopardy or influencing a potential jury pool.

Annie is far too stupid to get it.

Precisely. That was running through my head as I was typing it.

 

[AntonToo]

The point is you twats lost,

Is that what you will mindlessly repeat as a response to Trump's administration doing corrupt shit for the next 4 years?

He won an election, so it's all good?

Get a brain, please.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Fact is, Adams didn't get away with anything.

 

[martybegan]

Is that what you will mindlessly repeat as a response to Trump doing corrupt shit for the next 4 years?

He won an election, so it's all good?

Get a brain, please.

He hasn't done a single corrupt thing. Stop using buzzwords you know don't apply to the situation.

He is doing things you don't like. Dems evidently approve of massive spending without any accountability or even tracking.

 

[AntonToo]

It was dropped "without prejudice" meaning since they didn't review the evidence, that he could be legally tried again for it.

They aren't disallowing him from being charged again.

Because HE WON'T BE TRUMP'S BITCH OTHERWISE.

You yourself already admitted that, and now you are going to torture logic and pretend there is something proper going on here?

 

[Orangecat]

What the fuck is so funny about blatant corruption?

Mostly your tearful wailing.

 

[AntonToo]

He hasn't done a single corrupt thing.

Dear Leader can do no wrong, you are sure of that.

Right Marty?

 

[Crepitus]

The point is you twats lost, Biden pardoned people for crimes they supposedly never had done but now can't be prosecuted for them even if they did happen, and let his son off the hook.

But bitch about corruption all you want, it makes you look like the fucking retard you are.

Dude, your imaginary accusations are not corruption.

End of thread.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

What the hell does that have to do with the topic?

Everything it's in your title

A New York City Democrat mayor corruption is always expected
The left only hates him now because muh avacados

 

[TemplarKormac]

Because HE WON'T BE TRUMP'S BITCH OTHERWISE.

You yourself admitted that, now you are going to pretend there is something proper going on here?

There is something proper going on, sounds like Trump exerting legal pressure on Adams to control his city or the DOJ will reopen the investigation.

And yes, he is still Trump's b**ch.

 

[Crepitus]

Mostly your tearful wailing.

If you aren't wailing about corruption when you see it you are part of the problem.

 

[AntonToo]

yor corruption is always expected

It is expected no more than PROSECUTION FOR THAT CORRUPTION.

If Adams broke the law he deserves to be prosecuted and convicted for it.

I don't know who put a crazy idea in your head that bribery should be ignored. What the hell is wrong with you?

 

[martybegan]

Dear Leader can do no wrong, you are sure of that.

Right Marty?

he's doing what he said he was going to do.

 

[martybegan]

Dude, your imaginary accusations are not corruption.

End of thread.

Not end of thread.

Keep defending a bloated unaccountable system, keep having judges deflect for you.

You guys keep this up and you will get DEMOLISHED in the midterms.

 

[BackAgain]

What isn't fact dumbass?

That a criminal case against Adams was dropped without any review of evidence?

How do you know that there was no review of evidence, Antoinette? Link it up.

That it didn't matter to Trump's DOJ how brazen or obvious his violations of the law were?

Really? You came to that conclusion based on news accounts? Or maybe you conducted your own investigations?

Save the notes.

 

[BackAgain]

he's doing what he said he was going to do.

And that REALLY bugs our libturds.

 

[AntonToo]

How do you know that there was no review of evidence, Antoinette.

Dum dum because TRUMP DOJ LITTERALY SAID their descision was not at all based on evidence against Adams.

You are directed, as authorized by the Attorney General, to dismiss the pending charges
in United States v. Adams, No. 24 Cr. 556 (SDNY) as soon as is practicable,
.....
The Justice Department has reached this conclusion without assessing the strength of the
evidence or the legal theories on which the case is based on

DOJ Eric Adams memo

CNN

www.documentcloud.org

 

[Crepitus]

Not end of thread.

Yeah, it is.

Bye!