Republicans, here is your front row to corruption

"Trump does not happen to like"? Does this stuff really pass for political news in the minds of the TDS left?
 
"Trump does not happen to like"? Does this stuff really pass for political news in the minds of the TDS left?
WTF? This thread is about a transparently corrupt order to squash ongoing criminal case against a crooked Democrat named Adams.
 
I'm stating an obvious fact - you have no problem "reading" Trump's mind when it comes to prescribing to him good intentions, but as soon as the implication of his actions are of a corrupt intent you play the fool and start talking about how it's not possible to infer that.

Again:






Zero self awareness, zero consistency, just cult.
Apparently, you are unable to distinguish between noting a set of circumstances would possibly allow someone to relax and insisting you know what that person is thinking and why they take a course of action (of which you reflexively and inevitably disagree, no approval allowed).
 
Apparently, you are unable to distinguish between noting a set of circumstances would possibly allow someone to relax and insisting you know what that person is thinking and why they take a course of action (of which you reflexively and inevitably disagree, no approval allowed).

Dummy when you are talking about supposedly him "relaxing" you are talking about reading what's on Trump's mind.

You can't actually know that he had any such worries at all, it's just your inference. Inference that you say is improper as soon as someone else judges his mindset for ordering a corrupt dismissal of criminal charges against Adams.
 
Dummy when you are talking about supposedly him "relaxing" you are talking about reading what's on Trump's mind.

You can't actually know that he had any such worries at all, it's just your inference. Inference that you say is improper as soon as someone else judges his mindset for ordering a corrupt dismissal of criminal charges against Adams.
Okay, we'll go with TRUMP! wasn't worried about Quid Pro Joe beating him. I don't read minds, so that's valid too. I notice that you won't say the same thing about what I said.
 

CFPB drops lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo over Zelle fraud​


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Tuesday dismissed its lawsuit against the operator of the Zelle payments network and the three U.S. banks that dominate transactions on it.

Since Acting Director Russell Vought has taken over the CFPB, the agency has dropped at least a half dozen cases brought by his predecessor, Rohit Chopra.

In December, the CFPB sued Early Warning Services, which runs the peer-to-peer payments network, as well as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, alleging that the firms failed to properly investigate fraud complaints or give victims reimbursement.

The CFPB said customers of the three banks have lost more than $870 million since the launch of Zelle in 2017. The service was launched to provide bank customers an alternative to peer-to-peer platforms including PayPal. Last year Zelle crossed $1 trillion in total volumes, which it said was the most ever for a peer-to-peer platform.

 
Back
Top Bottom