Republicans deserve what they get

[Doc1]

You did not type this with a straight face? Those men ruled with guns.

The siege of Stalingrad, the Generals pushed the Army out ahead and told them that if they took a step backwards they would kill them. They did, and the Gov did. I detest you fucking liars.

Uh, every military works on the threat of killing people who don't rush into battle. Ever hear of a guy named Eddie Slovak?

Here's the thing. When the Red Army was crushed in the initial blitzkreig, ordinary Russians fought with whatever they had against the invaders.

and when the war turned on the Germans, Germany fought to the last old man and little boy against the approaching allies.

LOL, because of the threat of the weapons behind them.

 

[Doc1]

And there you have it, folks. "Impose". The left does everything through force.

How did Adolf Hitler and the Nazis gain control of Germany and then other territories? Through force.

How did Joseph Stalin retain power in the U.S.S.R.? Through force.

How did Saddam Hussein ascend to the presidency of Iraq? Through force.

Sorry, buddy... all those guys controlled their countries because that's what the people wanted.

Joey once again attempting to rewrite history...

It's sad really. He is attempting to justify his own totalitarian beliefs.

 

[P@triot]

How did Saddam Hussein ascend to the presidency of Iraq? Through force.

No government can survive without the tacit support of it's people. This is basic PolSci 101.

Saddam’s government “survived” without the “tacit support” of the people. He did that by disarming them. Hmmm....just like you want to do with the American people.

 

[JoeB131]

Joey once again attempting to rewrite history...

No need to rewrite history...

Hitler was immensely popular when the Germans were winning the war.
Nobody overthrew Saddam until we invaded.

You see, this is the point you miss. Most people go along with dictators if they are competent at their jobs. It's the inept ones who get toppled.

 

[Doc1]

Joey once again attempting to rewrite history...

No need to rewrite history...

Hitler was immensely popular when the Germans were winning the war.
Nobody overthrew Saddam until we invaded.

You see, this is the point you miss. Most people go along with dictators if they are competent at their jobs. It's the inept ones who get toppled.

Joe I'm sorry but you really are an idiot. The people with the most weapons win. God I hope your progeny are more intelligent than you are.

 

[JoeB131]

LOL, because of the threat of the weapons behind them.

Okay, if you really need to believe that. The reality- People will fight for their country no matter how bad their leaders are.

Saddam’s government “survived” without the “tacit support” of the people. He did that by disarming them. Hmmm....just like you want to do with the American people.

There were plenty of guns in Iraq, buddy. That's why we got chased out with our tails between our legs.

The thing is, the people who fought against us being there didn't fight that hard against Saddam. Oh, he put down a few rebellions... but if we didn't invade, he'd still be there thumbing his nose at us.

Now the whole region is in chaos thanks to your hero, Bush.

 

[Doc1]

LOL, because of the threat of the weapons behind them.

Okay, if you really need to believe that. The reality- People will fight for their country no matter how bad their leaders are.

Saddam’s government “survived” without the “tacit support” of the people. He did that by disarming them. Hmmm....just like you want to do with the American people.

There were plenty of guns in Iraq, buddy. That's why we got chased out with our tails between our legs.

The thing is, the people who fought against us being there didn't fight that hard against Saddam. Oh, he put down a few rebellions... but if we didn't invade, he'd still be there thumbing his nose at us.

Now the whole region is in chaos thanks to your hero, Bush.

I feel sorry for you. Before Saddam fell there were no weapons but his in Iraq. The whole region is in chaos because Obama was no different than Bush. They both work for the same people, the Bankers. Obama didn't stop Iraq or Afghanistan, in fact he added Syria and Libya. You look more stupid with every post son.

 

[JoeB131]

I feel sorry for you. Before Saddam fell there were no weapons but his in Iraq.

Not true. The Shi'ite and Kurdish Militias were pretty well armed. And even they thought overthrowing Saddam would cause chaos. Which it did.

The whole region is in chaos because Obama was no different than Bush. They both work for the same people, the Bankers.

Okay, when you get into weird conspiracy theories, there's not much point in talking to you. The reality is, our foreign policy is dictated by our need for oil and the Zionists. And the thing is, there's really not a feasible alternative to it. Getting out of a war is a lot harder than getting into one.

Obama didn't stop Iraq or Afghanistan, in fact he added Syria and Libya. You look more stupid with every post son.

Here's the thing. Syria and Libya were happening no matter what Obama did. This is what happens when a dictator loses the tacit support of his people. Happy to have cleared that up for you.

 

[P@triot]

And of course, big insurance is just too greedy

Which is why you should create the Progressive Association for Really Affordable Socialized Insurance Terms Endowment (or P.A.R.A.S.I.T.E.). You won’t be “greedy”. You’ll be altruistic/selfless as you allow tens of millions to voluntarily join this foundation that serves as a “single player” system.

Isn’t the free market incredible, Joey? Everyone is absolutely free to solve any problem they want to solve - no government required, no government permission needed!

 

[P@triot]

I feel sorry for you. Before Saddam fell there were no weapons but his in Iraq.

Not true. The Shi'ite and Kurdish Militias were pretty well armed. And even they thought overthrowing Saddam would cause chaos. Which it did.

Two lies in two sentences. The Kurds were barely armed and they desperately wanted to overthrow Saddam Hussein (as did all of Iraq). The Shi’ite weren’t armed at all and were caught between their hate for Saddam (a secular leader) and their hate for the Kurds in northern Iraq.

 

[P@triot]

Here's the thing. Syria and Libya were happening no matter what Obama did.

Yeah...and Iraq was “happening no matter what Bush did”.

 

[JoeB131]

Two lies in two sentences. The Kurds were barely armed and they desperately wanted to overthrow Saddam Hussein (as did all of Iraq). The Shi’ite weren’t armed at all and were caught between their hate for Saddam (a secular leader) and their hate for the Kurds in northern Iraq.

Confused again, Poodle. The Sunnis kept the Shi'tes and Kurds pretty separated.

While they wanted autonomy, they knew that chaos would happen if the government was overthrown... And that's pretty much what happened.

Bush lied. People Died.

But it wasn't like you were going to sign up to serve, was it, Poodle. Let some poor black kid do that.

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah...and Iraq was “happening no matter what Bush did”.

Not really. There was no armed uprising against Saddam like there was against Khadafy.

We tried for decades to instigate one..... but the Iraqis weren't biting.

 

[P@triot]

Nobody overthrew Saddam until we invaded.

That’s because nobody could, dumb ass. The Iraqi people were so disarmed and helpless. Just like you want the American people to be.

Thankfully your dumb ass never gets what it wants!

 

[JoeB131]

Which is why you should create the Progressive Association for Really Affordable Socialized Insurance Terms Endowment (or P.A.R.A.S.I.T.E.). You won’t be “greedy”. You’ll be altruistic/selfless as you allow tens of millions to voluntarily join this foundation that serves as a “single player” system.

Isn’t the free market incredible, Joey? Everyone is absolutely free to solve any problem they want to solve - no government required, no government permission needed!

We already have a system like that. It's called "Medicare" and it works just fine.

Again, we are getting single payer, a lot sooner than you think Then you can suck it, you libertarian twit.

 

[P@triot]

Not really. There was no armed uprising against Saddam like there was against Khadafy.

First of all, you high school dropout, it is Muammar Gaddafi.

Secondly, there was only an “uprising” because Barack Insane Obama started one by arming radicals (including ISIS).

Third and final, even if there had been an uprising without Barack Insane Obama, what does that have to do with the U.S.? We don’t need to send troops, material support, money, etc. for any civil war in the Middle East.

Funny how you celebrate the deaths of Americans when radical marxists like Obama send them to die, but feign “outrage” if a Republican sends them to fight.

 

[P@triot]

Which is why you should create the Progressive Association for Really Affordable Socialized Insurance Terms Endowment (or P.A.R.A.S.I.T.E.). You won’t be “greedy”. You’ll be altruistic/selfless as you allow tens of millions to voluntarily join this foundation that serves as a “single player” system.

Isn’t the free market incredible, Joey? Everyone is absolutely free to solve any problem they want to solve - no government required, no government permission needed!

We already have a system like that. It's called "Medicare" and it works just fine.

Then what are you whining about? If it already exists, then everyone already has affordable healthcare. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound right now?

 

[Doc1]

Poor Joe. Hell he still thinks Benghazi was a spontaneous event caused by a video. He must defend his negro no matter what.

 

[P@triot]

Again, we are getting single payer, a lot sooner than you think

 

[P@triot]

Poor Joe. Hell he still thinks Benghazi was a spontaneous event caused by a video. He must defend his negro no matter what.