Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 119,876
- 123,002
- 3,645
Right, she quit that, too.She isn't running for reelection.
She calculated that continuing to try to ride the MAGA grift for short term gain would bring long term loss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right, she quit that, too.She isn't running for reelection.
Your tent has a lot of quitters too with using your own criteria.Right, she quit that, too.
She calculated that continuing to try to ride the MAGA grift for short term gain would bring long term loss.


The public is rejecting Trump policies, which she mirrored.Stefanik read the tea leaves, she was underwater by double digits with the governor.
Nancy Pelosi is not "giving up the ship".I find it humorous that these socialists/communist are attacking the republicans giving up
the ship and say nothing about their own stable of democrats that are giving up
the ship.
priceless
Nothing. She's a puppy dog who parrots every Trump position. That's why she's getting demolished in the polls. People hate Trump.What has Stefanik stated that disparaged Trump? I haven't seen anything.![]()
And two stars of the Party. Loyal Trump soldiers.Stefanik and MTG were two of Trump's strongest supporters.
Eyes are opening.
Yes, we pointed out there are always quitters, but there is a sudden uptick for republicans, right now.Your tent has a lot of quitters too with using your own criteria.
She sure did. She’s had that seat for several terms and has decided not to run for it againNo, she did not "quit" congress.![]()
Republicans are gullible, credulous fools.She received $359,494 in AIPAC bribes between 2023 - 2024. She'll be replaced by another pawn (could be a Demican or could be a Republicrat).
It really doesn't matter who's installed by AIPAC as long as they tow the line.
Which rising Democratic star is quitting?Your tent has a lot of quitters too with using your own criteria.
Didn't know you were a psychic too.
FFI, you're just out there trolling, aren't you?
As are Democrats. If anyone in America still trusts their Cult Party to "save America" he/she needs his/her head examined.Republicans are gullible, credulous fools.
Who was the rising star? Stephanik? Because she was picked as an ambassador?Which rising Democratic star is quitting?
I never called anyone a rising star, I just stated that itsWhich rising Democratic star is quitting?
Your tent always makes something out of nothing using half the facts.Yes, we pointed out there are always quitters, but there is a sudden uptick for republicans, right now.
Glad you're all caught up with the basic thread topic, finally. I guess whataboutism only gets you so far.
Neato!Your tent always makes something out of nothing using half the facts.
typical
I refute the argument and projections from your tent. Don't be so dense.Neato!
Which half is missing? The numbers were posted.
Do you mean, the half that you wish existed so that you could refute the points?
Yep.
Yes, by saying silly things.I refute the argument and projections from your tent. Don't be so dense.
Well, she can't promise to sell her soul to Trump for a job. How'd that work out? "But but, it's about "The Fam"!As difficult as it is to even imagine "polling USA" (and Synthaholic) getting the facts wrong, it turns out no . . .
Yes, Donald Trump nominated Elise Stefanik to be the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations in November 2024, and she accepted the role. However, in March 2025, Trump asked her to withdraw her nomination to maintain the Republican Party's slim majority in the House of Representatives.
- Trump officially nominated Stefanik in November 2024, stating she would be an "America First fighter" at the UN.
- Stefanik was preparing for the role and had a confirmation hearing in January 2025, where she vowed to fight antisemitism and support Israel.
- The nomination was withdrawn because, with the narrow five-seat GOP majority in the House, the administration did not want to risk a special election to fill her congressional seat.
- Trump explained the decision as "politics 101," prioritizing keeping Stefanik in Congress for crucial votes.
- He indicated she could be considered for a position in his administration in the future.
View attachment 1195588
Is it too late for you to ask for the thread to be taken down?