Republican Senators send a letter to Iran. Wow. Damn!

[ChrisL]

Well, I think Iran will probably try to get nukes, whether a deal is made or not. If we were them, we would do the same and to deny that is just ridiculous....imho.

Soooo, this being my presumption that Iran is going to try to get nukes, then I would rather have us in on a deal that allows inspectors and others to make certain they are not doing something not in the agreement that can lead to that.

And if Iran just continues with a covert plan to build nuclear weapons, I would rather us have the ability to be within their Nation covertly snooping, and I would rather have sanctions lifted and covert agents of ours working within those private companies selling to them, getting us as much info as possible on any covert operations going on in Iran....

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

 

[ChrisL]

Oh, I know, let's HELP THEM and make it EASIER for them to get the materials they need to make a bomb! Great idea!!!

Again, they already have the materials they need to make a bomb. They have uranium. They have centrifuges. They have the other goodies they need.

Our only option is trading supervision of their program by the IAEA in exchange for letting them have greater access to consumer goods.

The IAEA has said they are not cooperating, STILL.

 

[ChrisL]

Do we execute people for being gay? For being raped? For cheating on their husbands?

Too bad. Yes we can dictate to them, and for the good of the world, we should.

When you sign up for the military and ask to come back in a body bag, you can dictate to Iranians all day.

Most of us don't think reforming their culture is worth one American Life.

Bullshit. I don't want to reform their culture. I just don't want US giving them the means to destruction.

 

[Faun]

Well, I think Iran will probably try to get nukes, whether a deal is made or not. If we were them, we would do the same and to deny that is just ridiculous....imho.

Soooo, this being my presumption that Iran is going to try to get nukes, then I would rather have us in on a deal that allows inspectors and others to make certain they are not doing something not in the agreement that can lead to that.

And if Iran just continues with a covert plan to build nuclear weapons, I would rather us have the ability to be within their Nation covertly snooping, and I would rather have sanctions lifted and covert agents of ours working within those private companies selling to them, getting us as much info as possible on any covert operations going on in Iran....

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

 

[ChrisL]

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

 

[Slyhunter]

Well, I think Iran will probably try to get nukes, whether a deal is made or not. If we were them, we would do the same and to deny that is just ridiculous....imho.

Soooo, this being my presumption that Iran is going to try to get nukes, then I would rather have us in on a deal that allows inspectors and others to make certain they are not doing something not in the agreement that can lead to that.

And if Iran just continues with a covert plan to build nuclear weapons, I would rather us have the ability to be within their Nation covertly snooping, and I would rather have sanctions lifted and covert agents of ours working within those private companies selling to them, getting us as much info as possible on any covert operations going on in Iran....

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Then we need to blow them up.

 

[Care4all]

sanctions kill innocent people who have no say Chris, while the gvt officials bask in luxury....and continue to pursue their nuke goals.

Sanctions were a success in Iraq, eh?

Saddam and his fuel for food scam just made him richer...

 

[Faun]

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

 

[Faun]

Well, I think Iran will probably try to get nukes, whether a deal is made or not. If we were them, we would do the same and to deny that is just ridiculous....imho.

Soooo, this being my presumption that Iran is going to try to get nukes, then I would rather have us in on a deal that allows inspectors and others to make certain they are not doing something not in the agreement that can lead to that.

And if Iran just continues with a covert plan to build nuclear weapons, I would rather us have the ability to be within their Nation covertly snooping, and I would rather have sanctions lifted and covert agents of ours working within those private companies selling to them, getting us as much info as possible on any covert operations going on in Iran....

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Then we need to blow them up.

Let's start with you, ok? Strap a bomb onto yourself and lead the way.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Roadrunner]

Well, I think Iran will probably try to get nukes, whether a deal is made or not. If we were them, we would do the same and to deny that is just ridiculous....imho.

Soooo, this being my presumption that Iran is going to try to get nukes, then I would rather have us in on a deal that allows inspectors and others to make certain they are not doing something not in the agreement that can lead to that.

And if Iran just continues with a covert plan to build nuclear weapons, I would rather us have the ability to be within their Nation covertly snooping, and I would rather have sanctions lifted and covert agents of ours working within those private companies selling to them, getting us as much info as possible on any covert operations going on in Iran....

They hide things, they lie, and they do not cooperate with inspectors. As a matter of fact, they are STILL uncooperative. Still think it's a good idea?

Iran isn t providing needed access or information nuclear watchdog says - The Washington Post

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/w...-evades-queries-on-possible-nuclear-work.html

IAEA s Yukiya Amano Says Organization Can t Verify Iran s Past Nuclear Activity - US News

Yes, I do think it is STILL the better, and smarter OPTION.

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.




Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Then we need to blow them up.

Obama says we do not have the military means to "blow them up".

I saw it on CNN, and Wuff don't allow no lies.

 

[lake avenue]

Really interesting. Aren't they being tried for treason or something?

 

[Roadrunner]

Really interesting. Aren't they being tried for treason or something?

Who are you talking to, rookie.

Please learn to use the quote feature properly.

 

[lake avenue]

Really interesting. Aren't they being tried for treason or something?

Who are you talking to, rookie.

Please learn to use the quote feature properly.

I'm familiar with forums, I didn't mean to quote anyone. Not every post has to be a quote.

 

[ChrisL]

No it is not. Tougher sanctions are the smarter option. When the people have to choose between food and nuclear energy, they will choose food.

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

Why don't you google it and find out for yourself? There is a LOT of information. I'm tired of providing you with information that you just ignore.

You seem to be in denial and clueless.

 

[Faun]

The flaw in that logic is that it's not a choice the people get to make.

Sanctions don't work.

Despite the full force of sanctions, Iran was still enriching Uranium.

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

Why don't you google it and find out for yourself? There is a LOT of information. I'm tired of providing you with information that you just ignore.

You seem to be in denial and clueless.

No worries. I figured you were full of shit anyways.

 

[Faun]

Really interesting. Aren't they being tried for treason or something?

Who are you talking to, rookie.

Please learn to use the quote feature properly.

I'm familiar with forums, I didn't mean to quote anyone. Not every post has to be a quote.

Welcome aboard.

 

[ChrisL]

Sanctions do work, especially when you can get everyone on board. If sanctions did NOT work, we would not bother with them and would have abandoned them long ago.

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

Why don't you google it and find out for yourself? There is a LOT of information. I'm tired of providing you with information that you just ignore.

You seem to be in denial and clueless.

No worries. I figured you were full of shit anyways.

The information is readily available on google. Sorry if you don't know how to find information on your own.

 

[lake avenue]

Then explain how Iran was enriching Uranium, on its way to build nuclear weapons, if the sanctions were working?

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

Why don't you google it and find out for yourself? There is a LOT of information. I'm tired of providing you with information that you just ignore.

You seem to be in denial and clueless.

No worries. I figured you were full of shit anyways.

The information is readily available on google. Sorry if you don't know how to find information on your own.

the burden of proof lies on those making the claim.

 

[ChrisL]

Because of China and Russia. We can apply pressure to THEM too. WE have leverage.

Why Does The U.S. Still Give Millions Of Dollars In Aid To China

That has nothing to do with Iran. Which sanctions against Iran did China or Russia not abide by?

Why don't you google it and find out for yourself? There is a LOT of information. I'm tired of providing you with information that you just ignore.

You seem to be in denial and clueless.

No worries. I figured you were full of shit anyways.

The information is readily available on google. Sorry if you don't know how to find information on your own.

the burden of proof lies on those making the claim.

Why bother if they ignore it?

Maybe you want to learn. Here you go.

Let me google that for you