Report:Pittsburgh Shooter Named Nazi Robert Bowers Hates Donald Trump, Says Trump Controlled by Jews

[sealybobo]

He was right. Trump has exploded the debt with his unnecessary tax breaks.

Don’t forget obama handed trump the keys and said careful drive slow. Trump didn’t listen. He’s gone bankrupt many times so will we. It’s the downside to supply side economics. Big booms and big busts. And shady as ****

Still haven't learned anything from those arrogant Obama days have you?
.You're in the back seat now and if you don't shut the he'll up we'll turn this car around and leave you at home!

Nah. That’s not what worked for you guys. You bitched and moaned till the ignorant independents who sometimes fall for the republican message actually bought into trump university or when we stupidly elected bush twice. If we did. He may have stole Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Who else hates lesbians?

Are we to assume, you?

 

[SweetSue92]

Report: Pittsburgh Shooter Named – is Nazi Robert Bowers – Hates Donald Trump, Says Trump Controlled by Jews

Police are responding to an active shooting situation at the The Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill in Pittsburgh.

There are reports of MULTIPLE FATALITIES!

A man reportedly walked into the synagogue and opened fire during a Saturday service.

FOX News reported the shooter went to the third floor of the synagogue. Several worshippers were rescued from the lower floors.

RT reported: The shooter was reportedly wearing a green jacket, a blue shirt, and blue jeans. The radio chatter has cited his date of birth as September 4, 1972.

There are reports the shooter is a Nazi named Robert Bowers.

He hates President Trump and believes Trump is controlled by the Jews

Report: Pittsburgh Shooter Named - is Nazi Robert Bowers - Hates Donald Trump, Says Trump Controlled by Jews


Figure this needs its own thread since it is not being covered anywhere else.

Will Trump pay for his legal support? The killers boss a lesbian said this creature hated her made her cry Who else hates lesbians?

 

[edward37]

Who else hates lesbians?

Are we to assume, you?

Death you know the answer Man up for once

 

[SweetSue92]

Who else hates lesbians?

Are we to assume, you?

How did we randomly get to lesbians in this thread?

This is crazy....lol

 

[sealybobo]

You don't see the difference between local municipalities paying taxes to provide water and....NPR? The basic necessities of life and a bunch of windbags talking on the radio???

I mean I don't intend to be overly harsh but....this explains why you're a liberal. It's just mind-numbing to me.

I realize it’s not needed but npr is a benefit to society. Corporations can’t control npr. If you don’t see a problem with the rich owning and controlling all the media then that explains why you’re a conservative.

So the feds should sell off the Grand Canyon to a corporation? I mean it’s not “necessary”

You are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.

You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.

What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack[/QUOTE]
No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Who else hates lesbians?

Are we to assume, you?

Death you know the answer Man up for once

We don't know what your hatred of lesbians has to do with this thread topic. Did eddy get lost?

 

[edward37]

Who else hates lesbians?

Are we to assume, you?

How did we randomly get to lesbians in this thread?

This is crazy....lol

think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear it

 

[Windparadox]

You're talking AT me, you didn't ASK me what I knew about NPR.
So much easier to hate half you own nation's population when you put them in nice neat little boxes like you do, isn't it? I'm just showing you what you're like....do you realize this is what you do? You said really vicious things this morning about "Trump Supporters". Do you intend to be this person you are?

`
I've tried talking to you...an utter waste of time. While "generalizing" is not an accurate metric to employ when describing groups (and a logical fallacy), this place is far from an academic bastion of facts and logic. Those whom feel most guilty or are inherently prone to feel self-victimized by such hasty generalizations, seem to over-react the most to them and use hyperbolic language to describe their hurt. Not my problem. Next time, if you're going to denigrate something like public radio, at least show you have some working knowledge of it.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear it

Were you born Edwina? Or are you just lashing out as a tard "man"?

 

[SweetSue92]

I realize it’s not needed but npr is a benefit to society. Corporations can’t control npr. If you don’t see a problem with the rich owning and controlling all the media then that explains why you’re a conservative.

So the feds should sell off the Grand Canyon to a corporation? I mean it’s not “necessary”

You are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.

You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.

What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack

No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.[/QUOTE]

Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.

That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.

 

[edward37]

think we were speaking of hate and who are the real haters in this country, and who brings it on If the hat fits ,,,wear it

Were you born Edwina? Or are you just lashing out as a tard "man"?

Brooklyn NY the place where Trump had a bridge to sell you

 

[SweetSue92]

You're talking AT me, you didn't ASK me what I knew about NPR.
So much easier to hate half you own nation's population when you put them in nice neat little boxes like you do, isn't it? I'm just showing you what you're like....do you realize this is what you do? You said really vicious things this morning about "Trump Supporters". Do you intend to be this person you are?

`
I've tried talking to you...an utter waste of time. While "generalizing" is not an accurate metric to employ when describing groups (and a logical fallacy), this place is far from an academic bastion of facts and logic. Those whom feel most guilty or are inherently prone to feel self-victimized by such hasty generalizations seem to over-react the most to them and use hyperbolic language to describe their hurt. Not my problem. Next time, if you're going to denigrate something like public radio, at least show you have some working knowledge of it.

You didn't show one shred of "facts and logic" in that screed. You lumped all conservatives together and told me what I think. Then when I call you on it, you want to hide behind your usual wall of "facts vs opinions".

Was it fact or opinion, what you said about Trump supporters this morning? I mean you just posted, "Conservatives and their predisposition toward violence." Fact or opinion?

And then there was this: "Trump and his followers represent the very essence of hate". Fact or opinion?

I'm a Trump follower, in that I voted for him and generally support his policies. Do I represent the "Very essence of hate"? Present your FACTS to support that. Since you love facts so much.

 

[edward37]

You are a liberal. You think the State should own just about everything, I get this. This could go on all day.

You could not see the difference between WATER and NPR. I mean for the love of Pete.

What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack

No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.

Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.

That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.[/QUOTE]
Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??

 

[SweetSue92]

What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack

No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.

Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.

That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.

Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??[/QUOTE]

I have "a pension". It's not a great pension anymore, and new teachers certainly do not have a great pension. My health insurance is no better than my husband's in the private sector.

And my teacher union supports baby killing, which is why I very proudly do not give one red cent to the NEA and no longer belong to my union. Nope, I do not belong. Baby killers, as I said. They would not stop supporting Planned Parenthood, so I just stopped supporting them. And so have thousands upon thousands of other teachers.

 

[Windparadox]

You didn't show one shred of "facts and logic" in that screed. You lumped all conservatives together and told me what I think. Then when I call you on it, you want to hide behind your usual wall of "facts vs opinions".Was it fact or opinion, what you said about Trump supporters this morning? I mean you just posted, "Conservatives and their predisposition toward violence." Fact or opinion?And then there was this: "Trump and his followers represent the very essence of hate". Fact or opinion?I'm a Trump follower, in that I voted for him and generally support his policies. Do I represent the "Very essence of hate"? Present your FACTS to support that. Since you love facts so much.

God are you confused. You can't even go through an explanation without reading something nonexistent into it. Like I said, talking to you is an utter waste of time.

 

[sealybobo]

What about the Grand Canyon? You must want the federal government to sell it off to the highest bidder right? Yes or no

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack

No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.

Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.

That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.

Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??[/QUOTE]
And who’s going to take them away from future teachers?

But it’s ok for her because they already got theirs. This is what I don’t like about republicans. They don’t care about right and wrong after they benefitted from a liberal society and policies.

But if republicans can convince voters to vote against their own financial interests then I guess our socity gets what it deserves and right now republicans claim America is great again. If you believe that’s true then vote republican people.

It’s up to young voters and they are pathetic. So they’ll set their own future.

We have to look out for ourselves. The middle class has been disappearing since reaganomics. Don’t disappear with it.

 

[AZGAL]

 

[Rustic]

View attachment 225227

Cheesy and weak.

Poor short stack…

Getting along is way overrated...

Civilization and democracy depends on it.

Na, not really
This supposed to say a republic not a shit eating democracy

 

[sealybobo]

I don't particularly care either way. It could be privately owned; the gov't can keep nat'l parks. But certainly that is not in their Constitutionally outlined powers.

Why do you insist on an answer, so you can be appalled? I already know how you think: gov't should own everything. I get it.

Government is ultimately the referee. Think of the nfl. The poor are passing out peanuts in the stands for peanuts. We are players playing with/against the corporations. The corporations now own the teams and the league. And they they tell the politicians or referees how to decide.

Rigged

Yes. In capitalism some people will make vast sums of money and some will not. It still offers the most freedom to the most people and has lifted vast quantities of the world out of poverty.

Please do not tell me you're an actual Socialist. If you are, and are in MI, you must live in Ann Arbor. Gack

No I’m not a socialist. But I did experience what made America great. You won’t like it. It was unions.

But then bush sr created nafta and that was the beginning of the end for unions. Clinton put worker protections in nafta but bush 2 removed them.

Unions and the new deal created the middle class the world had never seen before. Do you think free market capitalism created the middle class? It didn’t. Labor laws, unemployment insurance, social security, none of these things were created by capitalism but they are what created the middle class that existed till about Reagan.

Oh listen, no doubt--in the Industrial Revolution there was a time that corporations needed reining in. Long work days, horrible pay, terrible conditions. That is precisely WHY gov't oversight is important. However. The pendulum swings, doesn't it? For a while the balance was just right and, yes, the middle class was born and was thriving. And then the unions got too powerful, too demanding and INSANELY too political, in the case of my profession (teaching). At my husband's old workplace, he was not allowed to empty his small trash can. It was detailed as a "union job". Even if it was full to overflowing.

That's what happened then--the unions became ridiculous, they just did. Some balance was necessary.

Who got all those great pensions for teachers$$??

I have "a pension". It's not a great pension anymore, and new teachers certainly do not have a great pension. My health insurance is no better than my husband's in the private sector.

And my teacher union supports baby killing, which is why I very proudly do not give one red cent to the NEA and no longer belong to my union. Nope, I do not belong. Baby killers, as I said. They would not stop supporting Planned Parenthood, so I just stopped supporting them. And so have thousands upon thousands of other teachers. [/QUOTE]
Typical republican. They got you on one wedge issue.

God, gays, guns, racism.

They got you on abortion. Now I see your agenda.

By the way, if trump, republicans or the Supreme Court believed abortion were murder why isn’t roe v Wade already overturned? They are allowing the murders to continue!,,