Report: DOJ Readies Assange Prosecution

[Lakhota]

U.S. Is Optimistic It Will Prosecute Assange

Assange will look good behind bars.

 

[AntonToo]

There have been reports on Assange's "failing health".. I can't help thinking he's gonna mysteriously die in custody at some remote American embassy ----- SAUDI STYLE.

They don't want to prosecute him -- they want to Khashoggi him...

...why? It's about justice not some sort of political vendetta.

Depends on why Assange is so important to them. APPEARS he's important because he knows too much and MAYBE has squirreled away some of the MORE INTERESTING stuff he received...

You don't mess with ex-CIA spooks and you probably shouldn't mess with the guy who KNOWS where the DNC emails actually came from..

But -- be my guest. After Avenatti and persecuting Kavanaugh and resisting yet ANOTHER ELECTION -- what's another fatal self inflicted wound?

They're not even sure what to charge him with. He didn't steal the field notes from the Afghan battlefield. Some muddle-headed trans did.. And where is the tranny who STOLE THAT info today??

Tell me.....

Man you are seriously wrapped up in all kinds of fantastical intrigue.

And you seem completely OBLIVIOUS to independent thinking and analysis.

Sure sure

 

[Lewdog]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

indicted for what?

For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.

 

[AntonToo]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

 

[OKTexas]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

And more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

You got any more assumptions in your pocket?

.

 

[AntonToo]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

indicted for what?

For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.

Also for wire fraud conspiracy.

 

[OKTexas]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

Link?

 

[Lewdog]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

Link?

They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.

 

[Care4all]

there is no confirmation of this.... even in the wall street journal article...?

 

[OKTexas]

U.S. Is Optimistic It Will Prosecute Assange

Assange will look good behind bars.

They got the man now they're looking for a crime, not supposed to be how it works.

.

 

[bripat9643]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

indicted for what?

For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.

He didn't "expose" it. Someone else did. All he did is make it easily accessible on the internet. Furthermore, he's not an American, and he's not in America, so how is he subject to U.S. espionage laws?

 

[Lesh]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?

 

[bripat9643]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

indicted for what?

For exposing secret U.S. information. He published previously cables that gave the names of undercover operatives and their locations putting their lives in danger.

Also for wire fraud conspiracy.

That's a bogus charge they always use for piling on a target they especially hate.

 

[OKTexas]

They just broke the news he is indicted.

Link?

They just announced it on MSNBC through a Washington Post report.

And the charges are?

.

 

[Care4all]

The case against Assange was built by Obama's corrupt DOJ, no?

This should be ..interesting.

DOJ did a lot of bad stuff during the Obama years.

Not sure if necessary gvt agency or not.

Well i guess the corrupt Trump DOJ decided to pursue it??

 

[bripat9643]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?

We ignored it because you're an idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

He denied it because it's not true, you fucking numskull.

 

[AntonToo]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?

....WTF? ADD kicking in again?

The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.

 

[AntonToo]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

He denied it because it's not true, you fucking numskull.

Idiot, it's true. It was Russians, that much is established and specific Russian agents were indicted for conducting this operation.

 

[bripat9643]

It's been established that the e-mails were provided to wikileaks by the Russians.

Assange is either a witting or unwitting agent of the Russians.

ANd more and more it looks like he is a witting Russian asset

Unwitting agent would not put up the denials Assange has.

No matter what they do or say, it always proves they are guilty of whatever the snowflakes accuse them of.

Ok maybe YOU can explain why Assange would vehemently deny that it was Russians if he was simply unwitting.

DId you miss the part where I said it was probable that he WAS a Russian asset?

....WTF? ADD kicking in again?

The question is not whether he was an asset for Russians (he absolutely was). The question is if he was a witting or unwitting asset to Russians.

The term "asset" is meaningless in this context. There's no crime of "being an asset" listed in the criminal code.