Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[markef]

Your source was debunked.

Briton ran pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign that helped Trump deny Russian links | Computer Weekly

A British IT manager and former hacker launched and ran an international Russian-influenced disinformation campaign that has twice provided US President Donald Trump with fake evidence and false arguments to deny that Russia interfered to help him in the election.

www.computerweekly.com

Here is a comprehensive assessment and record of multiple facts about the false allegations of Russian hacking of the DNC emails:

• Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC | RealClearInvestigations
• now reading:Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC

 

[markef]

Unfortunately for Gore, the proof came too late. Florida, under the leadership of Bush's brother, purged their voter rolls of nearly 58,000 felons using very loose guidelines in determining who was a felon. Because of the loose guidelines, it turned out the list was seriously flawed. It included people never convicted of a felony, but their name matched, or closely matched, the name of a felon. Many were convicted of felonies in other states but not in Florida, where they were legally allowed to vote. Many were convicted of misdemeanors but still eligible to vote. The state sent the list to each of the counties. Some chose not to use the list but most did. They ultimately found over 5000 black voters who were on that list but shouldn't have been, they were legally eligible to vote but were disenfranchised. Gore received 90% of the votes from black voters that year. Bush won the state by just 537 votes.

Democrats have a long history of refusing to promptly purge bloated voting registries of ineligible names, even after being ordered by courts to do so.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats have a long history of refusing to promptly purge bloated voting registries of ineligible names, even after being ordered by courts to do so.

More word salad

 

[Marener]

Here is a comprehensive assessment and record of multiple facts about the false allegations of Russian hacking of the DNC emails:

• Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC | RealClearInvestigations
• 
  
• now reading:Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC

Idiotic and taken out of context.

Even so, the cybersecurity firm isn’t in charge of proving anything and doesn’t have the capabilities to fully do so. The DoJ investigated and obtained ample evidence to prove it was Russia, although you will ignore it anyway.

 

[Rand]

You have a point even though you don’t realize it.

Trump’s intent was laid bare when he did NOTHING to stop the violence he knew was occurring… in spite of numerous people around him cajoling him to

I respectfully disagree with your interpretation (and of course, that's all it is...an interpretation based solely on the Left's vitriol).

What I do believe is that Trump called out election fraud and out came the Democrat knives, turning the tables with accusations of incitation, trumpeting those accusations throughout Liberal media. No better strategy could have been devised to divert and distract the public from accusations of fraud.

That said, the question of whether fraud took place in 2020, or even that of 'did Trump incite' are both moot now, since they are permanently in the past with no recourse.

But is it interesting that the Democrats fight tooth and nail against securing the election? The cries of "racist" are transparent and insulting to minorities. That they do so citing irrational reasons does nothing to diminish the idea that fraud has occurred in the past. AFAIC, there's really on one reason to oppose making elections as secure as they can possibly be, particularly in this age.