eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,482
- 38,470
- 2,605
22nd. NO
17th YES
State legislature reps should have been maintained
17th YES
State legislature reps should have been maintained
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meaning they make partisan back room deals to select a Senator
State Districts are Gerrymandered and don’t reflect the voters
No Thanks
The party in power decides the shape of voting districts, making them partisanState legislative districts aren't gerrymandered at all. PA District 7, ex given, is basically a rectangle. Representative Parke Wentling
The First Amendment can be a real pain. Gone!
Yeah we need a crooked politician potus for life, like we have in Congress.The 22nd Amendment is virulently anti democratic.
Only those who loathe democracy would tolerate the continuation of the 22nd Amendment.
We were able to repeal idiotic Prohibition. We can repeal the 22nd Amendment, too.
Oh, and while we’re at it, let’s get rid of the direct election of Senators, too. Let’s return some power to the States. Repeal the 17th Amendment.
You’re welcome, America.
The 14th had nothing to do with how state legislatures are structured, or how their federal representation is determined.The 14th amendment needs to be modified to allow the States to go back to upper legislative houses based on geography and not population.
It works for the Senate, and it's designed so big cities can't run roughshod over the whole State.
People can vote per person in the lower houses, the upper houses should be by county as they were before.
Cities can pass laws that deal in their cities, they shouldn't be dictating statewide laws just because they can.
Gone!I hate the Third Amendment
That was part of the constitutional compromises. They gave the state legislatures the power to chose their senators, and their EC votes for president. The people were only given the vote for the house of representatives (the peoples house).Before the 17th Amendment, Senators were elected by state legislators- who are popularly elected by the people.
The 14th had nothing to do with how state legislatures are structured, or how their federal representation is determined.
Please explain.
The court unanimously declared the New York City Board of Estimate unconstitutional on the grounds that the city's most populous borough (Brooklyn) had no greater effective representation on the board than the city's least populous borough (Staten Island), in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause pursuant to the Court's 1964 "one man, one vote" decision (Reynolds v. Sims).[3] The Board was disestablished.
What does the 14th amendment have to do with how states structure their government?
State legislative districts aren't gerrymandered at all. PA District 7, ex given, is basically a rectangle. Representative Parke Wentling
State legislative districts aren't gerrymandered at all. PA District 7, ex given, is basically a rectangle. Representative Parke Wentling
doesnt work that wayRepeal of the 22nd Amendment would apply to Presidents after Trump
He was elected under the terms of the 22nd
Board of Estimate of City of New York v. Morris - Wikipedia
This was then used as precedent to remove the ability of States to have upper houses similar to the Federal Sentate.
It did with the 18th amendment and the Volstead act.doesnt work that way
That's not what the supreme court said. They long acknowledged gerrymandering of state legislature drawn districts. But they will only step in, when the practice is so egregious, that it violates equal protection.