PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Democrats need the black vote, so they pretend they favor reparations. The funny thins is, agreeing to reparations for black Americans will supersize the Republican Party! I'll explain why.....
1.We, on the Right, always know more than our Leftist pals, because we read, and that means both sides, our authors, and theirs. I just began this book on reparations for black Americans. The very first thing that occurred to me, is that it is the path to a far larger Republican Party….and the end for the Democrat Party.
You’ll see why it is obvious.
2. This is what it is all about:
“Reparations for slavery is a proposal that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of slaves from the Atlantic slave trade.
This idea has been recurring in the politics of the United States, from the 1865 Special Field Orders No. 15 ("Forty acres and a mule") to the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.[1] This compensation has been proposed in a variety of forms, from individual monetary payments to land-based compensation related to independence. The idea remains highly controversial and no consensus exists as to whether and how it could be implemented.” Reparations for slavery debate in the United States - Wikipedia
3. Well….I don’t see why it shouldn’t be dealt with in a court of law, just like any tort is.
A tort is an act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability.
Tort | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
In order to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, commonly referred to as the injured party, must show that the actions or lack of action was the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is "delict".
Tort - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Tort
4. Now…..reduce the discussion to it’s simplest terms.
Say two men are waiting on line in a bakery, and the one second in line attacks the man ahead of him. A third man intercedes to protect the man being attacked.
Police detain all three, sorting out the details, and the result is a civil suit for damages.
Who has damages?
Who is responsible for those damages?
Who is blameless, and/or should receive a commendation?
Can you guess where this is going?
1.We, on the Right, always know more than our Leftist pals, because we read, and that means both sides, our authors, and theirs. I just began this book on reparations for black Americans. The very first thing that occurred to me, is that it is the path to a far larger Republican Party….and the end for the Democrat Party.
You’ll see why it is obvious.
2. This is what it is all about:
“Reparations for slavery is a proposal that some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of slaves from the Atlantic slave trade.
This idea has been recurring in the politics of the United States, from the 1865 Special Field Orders No. 15 ("Forty acres and a mule") to the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.[1] This compensation has been proposed in a variety of forms, from individual monetary payments to land-based compensation related to independence. The idea remains highly controversial and no consensus exists as to whether and how it could be implemented.” Reparations for slavery debate in the United States - Wikipedia
3. Well….I don’t see why it shouldn’t be dealt with in a court of law, just like any tort is.
A tort is an act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability.
Tort | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
In order to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, commonly referred to as the injured party, must show that the actions or lack of action was the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is "delict".
Tort - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Tort
4. Now…..reduce the discussion to it’s simplest terms.
Say two men are waiting on line in a bakery, and the one second in line attacks the man ahead of him. A third man intercedes to protect the man being attacked.
Police detain all three, sorting out the details, and the result is a civil suit for damages.
Who has damages?
Who is responsible for those damages?
Who is blameless, and/or should receive a commendation?
Can you guess where this is going?