Remember Who We Are

[toobfreak]

I assume you wouldn't say that unless you could provide proof of charges and/or arrest.

Charges! Charges! What do charges matter? Is Hillary any less guilty of destruction of government records and endangering top secret info just because Comey chose NOT to charge her for destroying 33,000 government emails and using a common consumer phone in hostile foreign countries? Is Biden any less guilty of undermining our country or taking bribes just because he was never charged for inviting in open wide 20 million illegals or his family taking in millions in gifts from China and Romania?

Charges carry forward a criminal prosecution for given acts based on the willingness of a legal system to seek recompensation for deeds done in violation of a law, but the lack of a charge does not change or take away what those acts were, just the willingness to seek damages thereof.

This guy is associated with a terror organization. He was terrorizing students he did not like on a college campus. He was inciting violence and damage at Columbia. This is not free speech, it is not a right, it is gross misbehavior in a foreign country, and it isn't like you can just fine him or arrest him, rehab him, then send him on his way. This guy is a promoter and advocate for an enemy terror organization.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Charges! Charges! What do charges matter? Is Hillary any less guilty of destruction of government records and endangering top secret info just because Comey chose NOT to charge her for destroying 33,000 government emails and using a common consumer phone in hostile foreign countries? Is Biden any less guilty of undermining our country or taking bribes just because he was never charged for inviting in open wide 20 million illegals or his family taking in millions in gifts from China and Romania?

Charges carry forward a criminal prosecution for given acts based on the willingness of a legal system to seek recompensation for deeds done in violation of a law, but the lack of a charge does not change or take away what those acts were, just the willingness to seek damages thereof.

This guy is associated with a terror organization. He was terrorizing students he did not like on a college campus. He was inciting violence and damage at Columbia. This is not free speech, it is not a right, it is gross misbehavior in a foreign country, and it isn't like you can just fine him or arrest him, rehab him, then send him on his way. This guy is a promoter and advocate for an enemy terror organization.

People working towards CITIZENSHIP need to be on their best behavior. They are not citizens. We owe them nothing and can send them home at any time. He deserves as much pity as those Jewish students whose rights he denied. Fuck his Hamas supporting ass

 

[sparky]

Ok then.....

you folks do realize we've a 'terrorist watch' manifesto>>>

Audit Report 05-27

oig.justice.gov

the FBI's>>>

Terrorism | Federal Bureau of Investigation

To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic extremists and help dismantle terrorist networks worldwide.

www.fbi.gov

many of these groups are domestic, BLM, ANTIFA, White supremacists , or simply anti-authoritarians (like the Dems have become)

by the same metric imparted by the EO & AAA , they could be silenced as well, h#ll a good number of posters here could too!

Are you folks ok w/that?

~S~

 

[buttercup]

Ok then.....

you folks do realize we've a 'terrorist watch' manifesto>>>

Audit Report 05-27

oig.justice.gov

the FBI's>>>

Terrorism | Federal Bureau of Investigation

To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic extremists and help dismantle terrorist networks worldwide.

www.fbi.gov

many of these groups are domestic, BLM, ANTIFA, White supremacists , or simply anti-authoritarians (like the Dems have become)

by the same metric imparted by the EO & AAA , they could be silenced as well

Are you folks ok w/that?

~S~

I was going to say basically the same thing earlier. Do people realize that pretty much anyone can be called a "terrorist," including patriots or anyone who corrupt powers want to silence or discredit? Not only has that already happened, but it's just going to get worse as time goes on.

And yet so many are playing right into the hands of those who would have no problem throwing them under the bus, once they are no longer useful.

Wake up, folks. Remember the quote about eternal vigilance being the price of liberty? Apparently not, based on how so many people are easily tricked into willingly handing over their liberties these days.

 

[eagle1462010]

Walk down memory lane.

 

[Correll]

Ok then.....

you folks do realize we've a 'terrorist watch' manifesto>>>

Audit Report 05-27

oig.justice.gov

the FBI's>>>

Terrorism | Federal Bureau of Investigation

To counter terrorism, the FBI's top investigative priority, we use our investigative and intelligence capabilities to neutralize domestic extremists and help dismantle terrorist networks worldwide.

www.fbi.gov

many of these groups are domestic, BLM, ANTIFA, White supremacists , or simply anti-authoritarians (like the Dems have become)

by the same metric imparted by the EO & AAA , they could be silenced as well, h#ll a good number of posters here could too!

Are you folks ok w/that?

~S~

You seem to be missing the point that a foreign national has no right to be here, and can be sent home if they are unwelcome because of shitty behavior.

To be clear, ANY non-American that is a member of blm, antifa or the klan, I would be fine with them ALL being deported immediately.

And the dems are not "anti-authoritarian". That ship sailed with the biden lawfare and the dem support of it.

 

[The Duke]

How many laws does the average American break every day?


Yes, that's right, the average person is thought to commit at least three felonies a day. Again, a person may think they really have to work at committing such a crime, but the facts say that the abundance of felony crimes on the books makes it easier than expected.
Google


The party in power will never have to look far to find a law that they can claim we are breaking.
This is why we must honor our principles.
One of the reasons I voted for Trump, perhaps the best reason, was my opposition to censorship, and the cancel culture that targets speech they oppose.

Don't slip into the Fascism of the Democrats.

He was here on a student visa, he is no longer a desired student in America. Buh-Bye now.

 

[eagle1462010]

No Sympathy. Look at Europe and what they have done to themselves. There is a reason the middle East is down to basically Islam.

THEY DO NOT ADAPT TO OTHER RELIGIONS. THEY WILL DEMAND WE ADAPT TO THEM.

we dont need this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't know and don't care. Just deport him already.

I expect more from my side of the ideological divide.

 

[The Duke]

I expect more from my side of the ideological divide.

I done said my piece. Is there a "but" to it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

One of the few times I have to disagree. He is a terrorist supporter. This goes far beyond "speech "

What terrorism has he performed?

What charges have been brought against him.

I expect our side to be different from the Fascist Democrats.

What is the reason for fighting them if we become them?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Charges! Charges! What do charges matter? Is Hillary any less guilty of destruction of government records and endangering top secret info just because Comey chose NOT to charge her for destroying 33,000 government emails and using a common consumer phone in hostile foreign countries? Is Biden any less guilty of undermining our country or taking bribes just because he was never charged for inviting in open wide 20 million illegals or his family taking in millions in gifts from China and Romania?

Charges carry forward a criminal prosecution for given acts based on the willingness of a legal system to seek recompensation for deeds done in violation of a law, but the lack of a charge does not change or take away what those acts were, just the willingness to seek damages thereof.

This guy is associated with a terror organization. He was terrorizing students he did not like on a college campus. He was inciting violence and damage at Columbia. This is not free speech, it is not a right, it is gross misbehavior in a foreign country, and it isn't like you can just fine him or arrest him, rehab him, then send him on his way. This guy is a promoter and advocate for an enemy terror organization.

Charges! Charges! What do charges matter? Is Hillary any less guilty of destruction of government records and endangering top secret info just because Comey chose NOT to charge her for destroying 33,000 government emails and using a common consumer phone in hostile foreign countries? Is Biden any less guilty of undermining our country or taking bribes just because he was never charged for inviting in open wide 20 million illegals or his family taking in millions in gifts from China and Romania?

Charges carry forward a criminal prosecution for given acts based on the willingness of a legal system to seek recompensation for deeds done in violation of a law, but the lack of a charge does not change or take away what those acts were, just the willingness to seek damages thereof.

This guy is associated with a terror organization. He was terrorizing students he did not like on a college campus. He was inciting violence and damage at Columbia. This is not free speech, it is not a right, it is gross misbehavior in a foreign country, and it isn't like you can just fine him or arrest him, rehab him, then send him on his way. This guy is a promoter and advocate for an enemy terror organization.

What charges have been brought against him.

I expect our side to be different from the Fascist Democrats.

What is the reason for fighting them if we become them?

 

[sparky]

You seem to be missing the point that a foreign national has no right to be here, and can be sent home if they are unwelcome because of shitty behavior.

That's being addressed Correll>>>

MSN

To be clear, ANY non-American that is a member of blm, antifa or the klan, I would be fine with them ALL being deported immediately.

Then do so by means that do not violate our freedoms, because when we do we're no better than the oppressed countries we're deporting them to

~S~

 

[PoliticalChic]

I was going to say basically the same thing earlier. Do people realize that pretty much anyone can be called a "terrorist," including patriots or anyone who corrupt powers want to silence or discredit? Not only has that already happened, but it's just going to get worse as time goes on.

And yet so many are playing right into the hands of those who would have no problem throwing them under the bus, once they are no longer useful.

Wake up, folks. Remember the quote about eternal vigilance being the price of liberty? Apparently not, based on how so many people are easily tricked into willingly handing over their liberties these days.

Remember how the FBI investigated parents who complained at school board meetings as terrorists?

Some on our side forget that, and see only revenge.

 

[The Duke]

What charges have been brought against him.

I expect our side to be different from the Fascist Democrats.

What is the reason for fighting them if we become them?

He disrupted the entire student body of Columbia University while being there on a student visa as a foreign national.
He's toast! Burnt toast. I'm starting to get skeptical of you after years of thinking you're OK for not calling out traitors for what they are.
I am a real cracker American, I'll tell you that.

 

[Correll]

That's being addressed Correll>>>

No, it's really not. Not in this thread.

MSN

Then do so by means that do not violate our freedoms, because when we do we're no better than the oppressed countries we're deporting them to

~S~

As I have no "freedom" to go to a country where I am not welcome, deporting someone from here, because they are not welcome,


does not violate "our freedoms", or anyone's freedoms.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You seem to be missing the point that a foreign national has no right to be here, and can be sent home if they are unwelcome because of shitty behavior.

To be clear, ANY non-American that is a member of blm, antifa or the klan, I would be fine with them ALL being deported immediately.

And the dems are not "anti-authoritarian". That ship sailed with the biden lawfare and the dem support of it.

he is a legal resident, and that the Constitution applies to him.

Permanent legal residents are protected under the laws of the United States and all local jurisdictions. In addition, permanent legal residents are protected and maintain rights as given by the Constitution, including due process of law and equal protection under the law.
Howard University School of Law Library
https://library.law.howard.edu › immigration › rights
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
No statutes, case law, state laws, etc trump the Constitution. That's my position:
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

• Freedom of Speech:
  This protects the right to express oneself, even if the expression is unpopular or controversial.

https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

He disrupted the entire student body of Columbia University while being there on a student visa as a foreign national.
He's toast! Burnt toast. I'm starting to get skeptical of you after years of thinking you're OK for not calling out traitors for what they are.
I am a real cracker American, I'll tell you that.

he is a legal resident, and that the Constitution applies to him.

Permanent legal residents are protected under the laws of the United States and all local jurisdictions. In addition, permanent legal residents are protected and maintain rights as given by the Constitution, including due process of law and equal protection under the law.
Howard University School of Law Library
https://library.law.howard.edu › immigration › rights
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
No statutes, case law, state laws, etc trump the Constitution. That's my position:
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

• Freedom of Speech:
  This protects the right to express oneself, even if the expression is unpopular or controversial.

https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, it's really not. Not in this thread.




As I have no "freedom" to go to a country where I am not welcome, deporting someone from here, because they are not welcome,


does not violate "our freedoms", or anyone's freedoms.

he is a legal resident, and that the Constitution applies to him.

Permanent legal residents are protected under the laws of the United States and all local jurisdictions. In addition, permanent legal residents are protected and maintain rights as given by the Constitution, including due process of law and equal protection under the law.
Howard University School of Law Library
https://library.law.howard.edu › immigration › rights
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
No statutes, case law, state laws, etc trump the Constitution. That's my position:
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

• Freedom of Speech:
  This protects the right to express oneself, even if the expression is unpopular or controversial.

https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.

 

[The Duke]

he is a legal resident, and that the Constitution applies to him.

Permanent legal residents are protected under the laws of the United States and all local jurisdictions. In addition, permanent legal residents are protected and maintain rights as given by the Constitution, including due process of law and equal protection under the law.
Howard University School of Law Library
https://library.law.howard.edu › immigration › rights
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.
No statutes, case law, state laws, etc trump the Constitution. That's my position:
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, protects fundamental freedoms, including freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.

• Freedom of Speech:
  This protects the right to express oneself, even if the expression is unpopular or controversial.

https://library.law.howard.edu/civi...are protected,equal protection under the law.

How is he a legal resident?