Remember when Jimmy Kimmel stated that it was a "delightful shock that Tucker Carlson got fired"?

Does it take engaging in hateful, bigoted speech to be a "superb" christian?
Does it take being a moron for FAGATs to provide an example of Kirk's "hateful, bigoted speech?


Be a good FAGAt and provide an example.
 
You're FOS, as usual.

Stewart, Colbert slam CBS, Trump for cancellation of late ...

View attachment 1163867
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2025/07/22 › donal...
Jul 22, 2025 — Trump wrote on Truth Social Friday he “absolutely loves” that the show was canceled. “His talent was even less than his ratings,” he said.

Trump is now turning his attention to other longtime late night rivals who have also voiced support for Colbert, saying he hopes he plays “a major part in” what he describes as their rumored departures.

“The word is, and it’s a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone,” he wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. “These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television.”

This doesn't say what you want it to say.
 
The government didn’t fire Kimmel either dumbass.
The FCC Chair applied public pressure in the form of a bullshit lie and mischaracterization about Mr. Kimmel's monologue on Monday night. His monologue was his standard anti trump and MAGANUT jokes and ridicules, his audience expects. The Mega-Media groups who are dependent on the FCC and keeping Benedict Donald happy, used that threat to demand his removal from the air waves. The reason is simple they want the FCC to change the rules for them. They want to increase the number of affiliate station they can control. Their goal is to limit the information the US public gets. A violation of the 1st Amendment principles. The Mega-Media companies not to be broken up, not given more power over information.
 
Sure. After they were threatened.
What you on the left don't seem to grasp is that CBS, NBC and ABC have special broadcast licenses granted to them by the Federal Government and part of being given those licenses is the expectation of being non partisan. You're supposed to show both sides of issues. Over the years however those networks have become blatantly biased towards the left. What Trump is pointing out is that if you're not being non partisan...then you shouldn't HAVE a special license!

The left is so used to having total domination of the networks that the very concept of fairness is something they can't even consider! They're used to having the networks be their mouthpieces.
 
What you on the left don't seem to grasp is that CBS, NBC and ABC have special broadcast licenses granted to them by the Federal Government and part of being given those licenses is the expectation of being non partisan. You're supposed to show both sides of issues. Over the years however those networks have become blatantly biased towards the left. What Trump is pointing out is that if you're not being non partisan...then you shouldn't HAVE a special license!

The fairness doctrine ended decades ago. You’re wrong.
 
So did that weirdo muppet looking asshole on MSNBC.

HE JERKED OFF OVER TUCKER’S FIRING, THEN CRIED OVER KIMMEL.

GFY.

What is that asshole’s name?

1758297210500.webp


This goofy ****. Loved Tucker getting fired. Couldn’t believe Kimmel got fired.

These people are absolute assholes.
 
broadcast licenses granted to them by the Federal Government and part of being given those licenses is the expectation of being non partisan.
Not at all true. At a time when there were a few nation wide networks the legislators reasoned that if any one political party was able to monopolize a network they could broadcast a single political perspective 24/7. So they put in place the forerunner to the fairness doctrine a century ago for Radio. The fairness doctrine forced broadcaster to air differing points of view but they never require equal time or anything like that. The doctrine was discarded by Raygun because of the plethora of Cable News and multiple sources of information from the private cable networks. However by no longer enforcing the fairness doctrine, over the air networks were no longer required to air opposition opinions and could broadcast from a single political perspective all day, every day.
 
Not at all true. At a time when there were a few nation wide networks the legislators reasoned that if any one political party was able to monopolize a network they could broadcast a single political perspective 24/7. So they put in place the forerunner to the fairness doctrine a century ago for Radio. The fairness doctrine forced broadcaster to air differing points of view but they never require equal time or anything like that. The doctrine was discarded by Raygun because of the plethora of Cable News and multiple sources of information from the private cable networks. However by no longer enforcing the fairness doctrine, over the air networks were no longer required to air opposition opinions and could broadcast from a single political perspective all day, every day.

The issue may be-

Intentional misinformation and disinformation that is clearly not in the public interest.
 
15th post
The issue may be-

Intentional misinformation and disinformation that is clearly not in the public interest.
Criticizing by making fun of MAGANUTS, their Dear Leader, and their policy efforts as they pertain to the slaying of Mr. Kirk, is not misinformation or disinformation. It is criticism.

It might be considered that in Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, or Turkey or other illiberal states But not here. Not yet.
 
Criticizing by making fun of MAGANUTS, their Dear Leader, and their policy efforts as they pertain to the slaying of Mr. Kirk, is not misinformation or disinformation. It is criticism.

It might be considered that in Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, or Turkey or other illiberal states But not here. Not yet.
That's what you think Kimmel was doing?
 
There are people with liberal views who have platforms that reach many people, Bill Maher for example, and God Bless them, these are people I disagree with more times than not, but hey, just remember, Maher said he liked Charlie Kirk, which is proof that true liberal and conservatives can be united, have civil conversations and be friends. I can go on with many more examples, but you get the point.

Am I thrilled that Jimmy Kimmel get canceled? Absolutely!!! I am so glad he is gone. Remember when Kimmel celebrated Tucker Carlson being fired? Well, good old karma came back to haunt him and it is a "delightful shock" that Kimmel got canceled. For a long time, the radical left has been trying to get the conservative broadcasters fired and they have tried to silence all opposing views with cancel culture as well, yet these are the same scumbags who label the right fascist??? Well, there is a good example of an oxymoron if you are looking for one. Normally I would not celebrate something like this, but Kimmel and Colbert, both completely untalented one-trick ponies getting canceled is just great. Neither of them has ever stood up for free speech for their opposition like Bill Maher did for Rush Limbaugh. Bad riddance to both Kimmel and Colbert, now the far-left is getting a shovel full of what they have been slinging to the right, now they know what it is like, and this is a good thing. As for us, we will be celebrating Kimmel being canceled with a nice dinner in a rare day off for me. We will also be opening a bottle of Cremant (a great sparkling white wine from France that is an outstanding value).

What is even sweeter is how Kimmel is absolutely livid over being canceled, yet this is the same person who was laughing when Tucker Carlson got fired. Gotta love that karma thing. Look at who was laughing, and now look at who is crying. Ha ha, this is hilarious and absolutely deserved.

Here is the link to Kimmel at the time celebrating

Now, look who is crying, LOL, just too funny.
Wow. It can be a delightful surprise when someone gets verbally smacked down for having said dishonest biased shit.

I wouldn’t boycott Kimmel because I don’t watch his shit late night propaganda fest, anyway.

But it is not censorship when a public broadcast network — which benefits from a grant of a government license to use OUR airwaves — feels compelled to actually respond to a public expression of displeasure by the audience and by affiliated stations in a way which others understand.

Many of us could lose our jobs if we said something so egregious that it could damage our employers’ business reputation. There is no good reason why a chump like Kimmel can’t be treated the same way.
 
Back
Top Bottom