Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
According to one of his many versions of the story. "yeah, yeah, that's the ticket!"He pulled it out of the holster because Brown was attacking him.
Nope, still doesn't make any sense. I think he was just a thug cop, who apparently used the N-word fairly often, who just saw two black kids he could harrass because he had a badge and a gun. When they didn't put up with that, he murdered one of them.This has been explained to you multiple times before and is what Wilson testified at trial; when he confronted them for walking in the street he was not aware they were the guys from the convenience store theft. It was when he noticed the cigars in Brown's hand that the two fit the description of the suspects in the police radio call just minutes before.
he was not shot with his hands up in surrender which means it does have everything to do with it.Which has nothing to do with him being shot when he had his hands up.
What "Credible evidence"? The only thing the evidence proves is that this boy was shot another six times AFTER the altercation in the car.
He was shot in the chest. Same difference
View attachment 933874
he did not gibve multiple versions dumbass'According to one of his many versions of the story. "yeah, yeah, that's the ticket!"
Nope, still doesn't make any sense. I think he was just a thug cop, who apparently used the N-word fairly often, who just saw two black kids he could harrass because he had a badge and a gun. When they didn't put up with that, he murdered one of them.
You DO when the jaywalker attacks youAccording to Wilson's own statement, he didn't try to take the gun until Wilson pulled it out of the holster.
Seems to me you don't pull a gun on a jaywalker or a shoplifter.
Really? Seems like if there was a shot in a confined space, there would be blood splatter.
Unarmed, barefoot, wounded and trying to give up isn't a threat.
That didn't make any sense. If that were the case, why would he treat them like jaywalkers if they were robbery suspects?
Yes more motherfuckers like the criminals you support and loveOh, it will when we start throwing more of the fuckers in jail.
We already know and have estaclished you never served in the military you chicken hawk lying motherfucerActually, Wilson's story was all over the place. Sometimes he said he stopped them for jaywalking, sometimes for the supposed altercation at the convenience store. NEITHER incident really justified escalating to LETHAL force, by the way.
Court Docs May Show Contradictions in Darren Wilson’s Account of Michael Brown Shooting
ST. LOUIS, Mo. (KMOV.com) — A document filed in a civil lawsuit over former officer Darren Wilson’s fatal shooting of Michael Brown may show contradictions to previous accounts of what …www.ozarksfirst.com
In the document Wilson, admits that he’d been accused of excessive force and of racial discrimination while working as a police officer in Ferguson, and that he had used the “n-word” while referring to African Americans.
In the Department of Justice investigation of Brown’s death, investigators concluded witness accounts that Wilson reached out of his vehicle and grabbed Brown by the neck were inconsistent with physical and forensic evidence. However, Wilson admits in the document to reaching out and grabbing Brown by the forearm.
In the document below, Wilson admits Brown never tried to remove his gun from the holster. In grand jury testimony, Wilson said Brown grabbed his gun and that he feared for his life.
McCormick said attorneys ask very specific questions in a “request for admissions” and that the document doesn’t tell the full story of what happened that day. But if Wilson’s admissions contradict his previous testimony, it could undermine the credibility of his entire version of events.
“Well I think that it does, if he lied about this particular thing which he used to justify his conduct at the time, what else did he lie about,” said McCormick.
The supposed "Forensic evidence" is that his shirt wasn't pulled up over his head like it would have been when he put his hands up. (This is only for the Chest shot, not the arm shots or head shot. That works if you put your arms straight up, but not if you just have your hands up parallel to your body.
I'll take the word of 14-22 witnesses before speculation of where a tee-shirt SHOULD be.
If I shot a barefoot, unarmed kid in the military, I probably would have been courtmaritalled.
All of the autopsies and wounds to Wilson and the physical evidence in gthe police car all of which you ignore because it proves you wrong and a coward
I'm pretty sure you'll keel over if hit in the chest.Your whole argument was that a stomach wound made Brown bend over. You lied like a coward because he was never shot in the stomach so your fantasy did not happen.
More likely to fall back from high chest hit.because it has nothing to do with the point he gunned down an unarmed kid.
I'm pretty sure you'll keel over if hit in the chest.
According to one of his many versions of the story. "yeah, yeah, that's the ticket!"
Nope, still doesn't make any sense.
I think he was just a thug cop, who apparently used the N-word fairly often, who just saw two black kids he could harrass because he had a badge and a gun.
When they didn't put up with that, he murdered one of them.
Ooooh, a scratchy! Poor baby.Wilson had the scratches and bruises on him to prove Brown attacked him.
No doubt you do. But this doesn't make it true and the forensic evidence supported Wilson's testimony.
Put up with what, being asked to use the sidewalk?
Ooooh, a scratchy! Poor baby.
Which testimony, the guy was talking out of both sides of his mouth. That's why the city settled so fast, because when they got him on the stand, and he admitted that Brown never tried to take the gun out of the holster,
and oh, yeah, he used the N-word all the time, they realized he was full of it.
Now, if they only had a prosecutor who asked tough questions.
Yes, how dare they actually walk across the street. Silly Darkie, rights are for white people.
He didn't pull his gun because they were jaywalking. Try again.You totally need to pull out your gun to deal with jaywalkers.
Yes it does have everything to do with it.because it has nothing to do with the point he gunned down an unarmed kid.
I'm pretty sure you'll keel over if hit in the chest.
Injuries are injuries regardless of severityOoooh, a scratchy! Poor baby.
Which testimony, the guy was talking out of both sides of his mouth. That's why the city settled so fast, because when they got him on the stand, and he admitted that Brown never tried to take the gun out of the holster, and oh, yeah, he used the N-word all the time, they realized he was full of it.
Now, if they only had a prosecutor who asked tough questions.
Yes, how dare they actually walk across the street. Silly Darkie, rights are for white people.
You totally need to pull out your gun to deal with jaywalkers.
He didn't pull his gun because they were jaywalking. Try again.
Walking down the center of the street isn't an offense that you need to pull a gun over.They were not crossing the street you rascist punk they were walking downt he center of the street
he drew his gun when attacked BOY
No, he pulled his gun because they were scary black people.
No one sane pulls a gun over a minor offense like jaywalking or shoplifting.
If he really did think they were dangerous thugs who pushed Apu into the Chip rack, (even though that didn't come out until later) he should have called for backup, not confronted them over jaywalking.
Walking down the center of the street isn't an offense that you need to pull a gun over.
It is pointless arguing with Joe he doesn't think reason or consider facts.Wrong. He pulled his gun when Brown attacked him.
He didn't.
Again, he didn't know they were the guys from the convenience store theft when he asked them to get on the sidewalk.
He didn't pull his gun on them for jaywalking.
Wrong liarNo, he pulled his gun because they were scary black people. No one sane pulls a gun over a minor offense like jaywalking or shoplifting.
If he really did think they were dangerous thugs who pushed Apu into the Chip rack, (even though that didn't come out until later) he should have called for backup, not confronted them over jaywalking.
Walking down the center of the street isn't an offense that you need to pull a gun over.
I've been sparring with him and have read a lot of his posts over the last few years and the guy can be perfectly reasonable when he chooses to be. Problem is, he very rarely chooses to be reasonable, even less so on the topic of Michael Brown.It is pointless arguing with Joe he doesn't think reason or consider facts.
Which version of the story was that, because his story kept changing.Wrong. He pulled his gun when Brown attacked him.
Again, he didn't know they were the guys from the convenience store theft when he asked them to get on the sidewalk.
