This tells them what they should do. I just verbalized it.There you go again telling people what they "should" do.
Just because you like what one guy says in no reason for me to read it. In fact it's more likely a reason not to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This tells them what they should do. I just verbalized it.There you go again telling people what they "should" do.
Just because you like what one guy says in no reason for me to read it. In fact it's more likely a reason not to.
And who wrote that? And why should I submit to that person as an authority?
Paul GrahamAnd who wrote that?
Because it is logical.And why should I submit to that person as an authority?
And I have to submit to him as an authority why?Paul Graham
![]()
Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement: How to Argue Like an Expert
Join me in revisiting Paul Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement. Can it help us survive Twitter? And is name-calling ever okay?themindcollection.com
Because you should always submit to what is logical.And I have to submit to him as an authority why?
Because it is logical.
I don't have to submit to anything or anyoneBecause you should always submit to what is logical.
Then please do state your logic because when I asked you for your evidence or logic, you couldn't.So what?
I am more than capable of determining what is logical on my own I don't need other people to tell me what to do.
Maybe you should back up what you believe with evidence and/or logic.I don't have to submit to anything or anyone
Maybe you should stop telling other people what they have to do.
Then please do state your logic because when I asked you for your evidence or logic, you couldn't.
Maybe you should back up what you believe with evidence and/or logic.
You don't and haven't. You posted your opinion. I asked for why you believed it and you provided nothing.Why do I have to honor all your requests?
How many times have I asked you to quote a post and you have refused to do so?
Great. Have opinions that aren't supported by evidence or logic. I couldn't care less. But don't expect me to accept your unsubstantiated opinions as fact or having any merit whatsoever.Why?
I don't need anyone else to tell me what to believe. Just because you need other people's opinions doesn;t mean I do. I don't need you validation.
You don't and haven't. You posted your opinion. I asked for why you believed it and you provided nothing.
You don't. Haven't I already explained this in post #694?And why do I have to prove it with the opinions of other people?
I don't have to prove anything to you.
Great. Have opinions that aren't supported by evidence or logic. I couldn't care less. But don't expect me to accept your unsubstantiated opinions as fact or having any merit whatsoever.
You don't. Haven't I already explained this in post #694?
Again... Have opinions that aren't supported by evidence or logic. I couldn't care less. But don't expect me to accept your unsubstantiated opinions as fact or having any merit whatsoever.I have no obligation to provide you with evidence of anything I believe. I have no obligation to walk you through my thought process.
If I actually thought you had in interest in any of those things I would but I don't think you do.
I couldn't care less if you do or don't.Why should I give any of your explanations consideration?