They were atheists. Their mystic experiments followed only the idea to create an own new pagan religion for idiots.
You just contradicted yourself.
No. I contradict your view to this world because I know more about this world - that'a all. And now you show only to me that you are not only unreal but also a very bad philosopher.
You claim they were atheists, then in the same breath admit they were trying to restore the ancient European pagan Germanic religion.
The Nazis had been pragmatists. They used everything they had been able to use.
One's position on the existence of a deity was no one's business and had no bearing on their membership status in the National Socialist Party. That wasn't the case in the Soviet Union. The German Nazis were non-Marxist socialists whereas the Soviets were Marxist-Leninists and hence atheistic, if not hostile, towards organized religion. You couldn't be religious and a member of the Soviet Community Party. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
You compare the devil Hitler with the devil Stalin and not devilish with heavenly.
Yes and no. Many Reds converted to Nazis and later many Nazis converted to Reds.
In your fantasy world perhaps, "many communists" became Nazis and Nazis Marxist-Leninists. You're quite confused and misinformed.
Then you never read what said German socialists who really fought Hitler.
Not really. Germany has currently very big problems with new Nazis who had been educated under the "anti-fascist protective wall" in the former GDR. Russia integrated a short time ago masses of Russian Nazi mercenaries into the Red army.
That's more silliness from your keyboard. The fact that there are a few white supremacist groups in Germany and Russia who idolize Adolf Hitler and his Third Reich, doesn't imply that the Soviets didn't destroy the Nazi State and win the war. Your opinion that a rag-tag gang of skin-head white supremacists equates to Hitler's Third Reich is ridiculous and not worth anyone's time and effort to debate.
Indeed you seem to have not any light idea what you try to speak about.
The Soviet leader Mao....
Mao wasn't a Soviet
?
and had some very serious disagreements with Soviet Russia and the way they implemented socialism.
....who deflowered a girl every day....
Get your mind out of the gutter. What evidence do you have that Mao was raping anyone?
The mass murderer Mao had not to rape anyone. Others brainwashed his victims.
...murdered up to 100 million Chinese.
There isn't a shred of evidence that Mao murdered 100 million Chinese, much less innocent Chinese. In war people die, even millions, but there's no evidence that Mao systematically set out to murder people. You're just spewing cheap, Western anti-Communist propaganda.
....The mass murderer Stalin murdered up to 20 million Russians.
More BS..
No. In case of Mao the real number is perhaps lower but I am not sure whether in case of Stalin the number is perhaps higher.
And it existed much more red monsters in all qualities of a montrous behavior.
You're suffering from a strong, hypocritical delusion being that your beloved capitalism is the one that has through imperialism murdered more people than any other ideology. The capitalist pursuit of profits has led empires to commit the most heinous crimes against humanity, so stop pretending that you have the moral high ground upon which to stand and point your crooked finger at anyone.
You're unable to discuss theology or religion in this religious thread so all you have left is to resort to cheap political rhetoric against socialists. Your religious beliefs are apparently indefensible.
Did I say anything about capitalism or socialism?
Duh, yes you did.
No, I did not.
You mentioned the German National Socialists and the Soviet Union (ak.a. USSR - Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics). You're the one spewing the silly Cold War propaganda and BS on this thread, because you're unwilling and unable to defend your silly religious mythology.
Says an "agnostics" who not knows whether someone could be right who believes in god? Why are you a liar, atheist?
As far as capitalism, I mentioned it to remind you that you're morally bankrupt when it comes to body-count arguments. Your sacred capitalism has murdered hundreds of millions of people in pursuit of profits and natural resources, hence you have no moral high ground upon which to stand and point fingers. Give it a break.
Seems to me you have a problem with capitalism. But what have I to do with your problem? Whether someone is a capitalist or someone is a socialist who believes in god is for me personally unimportant.
Nosense. You do not believe in god you believe in atheism.
.You're telling me what I believe with respect to the existence of God? I'm an agnostic, not an atheist.
In general is it impossible to compare the forms "believe in god" and "believe in atheism" with the philosophical position "agnosticism". An agnostics is as well able to believe in god as he is able to believe in atheism. But agnosticism is on it's own a philosophical concept and not a form of belief. For example is it impossible to think god exists and not exists the same time although god could exist and not exist the same time.
. I don't make an affirmative statement against the possible existence of God, nor do I affirm God's existence. I simply don't know hence I'm an agnostic. Look up the definition of agnostic vs atheist online, they're not the same. Atheism is an active, affirmative stance against the existence of God, and again, I don't take such a "strong" or perhaps I should say, "pretentious" position about whether God exists or not.
Then you do not understand - and you also do not really try to understand - what you try to speak about. God created existence.
Maybe, maybe not,
Definetelly you do not know what you try to speak about when you use the word "god".
we simply don't know yet. Moreover, as far as the existence of your biblical, Christian deity, there is zero evidence for that. You, nor any other Christian have ever presented any conclusive evidence that your religious version of a deity exists.
So what? What do you try to say? That god not exists or that god not notexists?
What a nonsense.
Are you asserting that It's nonsense to suggest that in a universe with trillions of galaxies and countless stars and planets, there might be intelligent beings who are millions of times more advanced than we are scientifically and otherwise?
Maybe it's nonsense - maybe not. I personally love science fiction - but I know very well the difference between fiction and reality. We are on our own one of the eldest galaxies of the universe and if an self-organisation of matter really should automatically lead to life then our galaxy should be full of life. I see nowhere life. And when I take a look at home to the only place I know where multi-celullar life exists since less then a half billion years then I do not think this mass of self organized dust plays a big role compared with matter which is not self organized in living structures.
No, you're the one who is making nonsensical claims and objections, not me. Practically all scientists agree with me,
What shows a firm belief of some people who I would call believers in science - whatever this is in this context.
that the likelihood of there being intelligent life on other planets is extremely high.
Why?
Some scientists even suggest that there can be life in other dimensions as well.
Which other "dimensions" - what for heavens sake could this really be? The only other dimension which really exists are "die Bretter, die die Welt bedeuten" = "the boards which mean the world".
What's to say that these lifeforms can't travel here or interact with us from wherever they are?
It's people like yourself who are nonsensical and ridiculous, denying the obvious.
I'm denying nothing. I have no problems with ETs. I only do not share your belief, that's all. I believe in reality.
You're forced to pretend that the UAPs and the idea of ETs are absurd because they completely dismantle your ancient Christian mythology. If advanced ETs exist that undermines your silly, immoral (anti-human) religious beliefs.
Indeed I said only something what's totally different. Even when ET's should exist since billions of years in this universe here - they will for sure not be gods.
But wherein are functioning "the laws of physcis"? Why exists such a bullshit? Who made it? Why? ...
That's English? Re-ask the question in English.
No. I fear the most people would also not understand what I ask here when I would ask in German. You seem to be one of them - even if you would be a native German speaker.
Sehn wir doch das Große aller Zeiten
Auf den Brettern, die die Welt bedeuten,
Sinnvoll still an uns vorübergehn.
Alles wiederholt sich nur im Leben,
Ewig jung ist nur die Phantasie;
Was sich nie und nirgends hat begeben,
Das allein veraltet nie!
Friedrich Schiller (1803)
