Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, maybe identical twins come not as one of the binary, "conjoined, not conjoined", but are actually conjoined by degree in all the spatial dimensions. The conjoined twins we see haven't completely separated in 3 dimensions. Perhaps some apparently non-conjoined identical twins did not completely separate in 4 dimensions.Cool thought.Maybe they do. If you stick your fingers through the surface of a body of water, note what a 2 dimensional being living on the surface observes: 4 circles that appear out of nowhere and expand. The "flatman" doesnt know your fingers or the shapes he sees are actually connected (by your hand) in a higher spatial dimension.If we exist in 4 dimensions that we know of, why couldn't parts of us such as our consciousness or sub conscious exist in other parallel dimensions simultaneously
Now imagine all humans -- or all life -- as those circles in that surface, all connected in a higher spatial dimension.
In a way almost describes the connection ancient people felt to the natural world, even using substances to reach into the "spirit world" for lack of better terminology of the times. A connection to the natural order. Circle of life.
Modern governments of the twentieth century experimenting with the concepts of ESP, precognition, telepathy, clairvoyance. A mental connection to the quantum realm.
Do we have the ability through evolution to become something more? We know very little of the brain, its abilities, its true capacity.
I can't believe this will be our same form if we made it another 500 million years.
A lot of claims over human history of a special mental bond of twins. I believe some were sought out in those experiments of telepathy and ESP. Although inconclusive, if we don't know how to tune the reciever, can't get a signal, so to speak.So, maybe identical twins come not as one of the binary, "conjoined, not conjoined", but are actually conjoined by degree in all the spatial dimensions. The conjoined twins we see haven't completely separated in 3 dimensions. Perhaps some apparently non-conjoined identical twins did not completely separate in 4 dimensions.Cool thought.Maybe they do. If you stick your fingers through the surface of a body of water, note what a 2 dimensional being living on the surface observes: 4 circles that appear out of nowhere and expand. The "flatman" doesnt know your fingers or the shapes he sees are actually connected (by your hand) in a higher spatial dimension.If we exist in 4 dimensions that we know of, why couldn't parts of us such as our consciousness or sub conscious exist in other parallel dimensions simultaneously
Now imagine all humans -- or all life -- as those circles in that surface, all connected in a higher spatial dimension.
In a way almost describes the connection ancient people felt to the natural world, even using substances to reach into the "spirit world" for lack of better terminology of the times. A connection to the natural order. Circle of life.
Modern governments of the twentieth century experimenting with the concepts of ESP, precognition, telepathy, clairvoyance. A mental connection to the quantum realm.
Do we have the ability through evolution to become something more? We know very little of the brain, its abilities, its true capacity.
I can't believe this will be our same form if we made it another 500 million years.
Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?You don’t know how natural selection works?Please enlighten us on what your mind thinks is the Darwinian view ...
Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?You don’t know how natural selection works?
Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?You don’t know how natural selection works?
Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.You don’t realize that natural selection is based on facts, not fantasy?
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
Science says no world wide flood.Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
God loves science. He created it.
Actually we do because there is a shit load of evidence. You only deny it because it scares you.We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.Apparently you don’t know what those facts are.
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
Yes, as far as I know. Science also says that the universe was created from nothing and that man is a product of that creation.Science says no world wide flood.Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
God loves science. He created it.
We can't see that far back, do you agree or not?Actually we do because there is a shit load of evidence. You only deny it because it scares you.We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.You don’t have any facts.
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
Science says that it can't actually see back to the BB. Agree?Yes, as far as I know. Science also says that the universe was created from nothing and that man is a product of that creation.Science says no world wide flood.Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
God loves science. He created it.
It depends on how you mean it. We can see back in terms of evidence.We can't see that far back, do you agree or not?Actually we do because there is a shit load of evidence. You only deny it because it scares you.We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".You know even less than PK.
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
No. I disagree. We can clearly see from the evidence that the universe had a beginning and that it scares the shit out of you.Science says that it can't actually see back to the BB. Agree?Yes, as far as I know. Science also says that the universe was created from nothing and that man is a product of that creation.Science says no world wide flood.Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.Seems several days worth of you guys bantering went dark.
Will those posts be reincarnated or are they one and done?
God loves science. He created it.
I didn't say that the BB didn't have a beginning, just that we can't see the beginning yet, so we don't know what happened exactly.It depends on how you mean it. We can see back in terms of evidence.We can't see that far back, do you agree or not?Actually we do because there is a shit load of evidence. You only deny it because it scares you.We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.Has anyone here EVER agreed with anything you've said? The answer is "no".
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
We can clearly see from the evidence that the universe had a beginning and it scares the shit out of you.
Now can you see?
Then you'd be wrong, because science can't see the actual BB.No. I disagree. We can clearly see from the evidence that the universe had a beginning and that it scares the shit out of you.Science says that it can't actually see back to the BB. Agree?Yes, as far as I know. Science also says that the universe was created from nothing and that man is a product of that creation.Science says no world wide flood.Funny how it seems you are the one who is upset.Dingbat's frustrated that nobody agrees with him on anything, so he acts like a jerk.
God loves science. He created it.
It’s a really stupid thing to be saying.I didn't say that the BB didn't have a beginning, just that we can't see the beginning yet, so we don't know what happened exactly.It depends on how you mean it. We can see back in terms of evidence.We can't see that far back, do you agree or not?Actually we do because there is a shit load of evidence. You only deny it because it scares you.We don't actually know if that was the beginning because we can't see that far back in time.All the time.
For instance, even you agreed the universe had a beginning like the Bible said.
We can clearly see from the evidence that the universe had a beginning and it scares the shit out of you.
Now can you see?
