Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not all that many shooters are NRA members believe it or not. The NRA claims to have 5 million members. Many gun owner have no interest in hunting. There are around 38 million hunters. Gun owners are estimated to be around 81 million.Or they could just seize NRA and Hunting Licenses
The biggest fallacy about Red Dawn is that the Russians could have invaded the United States and taken over. It lacked the means to deliver the necessary number of troops and supplies.lol
The Red Dawn fallacy.
And there are no ‘commies.’
www.worldatlas.com
Privilege versus rights.
What will happen if the directions of the NYPD are not followed?
..... until your excessive speeding renders your license invalid.Don't tell anyone, but I went 56 in a 55 mph zone.
I have a privilege to drive and a right to speed.
You'll have to argue with state law over that. I thought you were in favor of states having authority.
The biggest fallacy about Red Dawn is that the Russians could have invaded the United States and taken over. It lacked the means to deliver the necessary number of troops and supplies.
If a nation ever does invade the United States they will face armed resistance from civilians assuming gran grabbers are unsuccessful. If the gun grabbers are successful the United States will no longer be a free nation and would not be worth defending.
View attachment 701172
Yes, there are Communists today.
List Of Communist Countries Today
There are five Communist countries in the world today. Learn more about the spread of Communist and about the political history of each of these countries.
Or they could just seize NRA and Hunting Licenses
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."too bad the second isn't about militias isn't it?
You should stop drunk posting. If you were trying to make a point you did to irrelevanceTrying to register an illegal firearm doesn't magically make it legal possession no matter if you are previously a registered criminal or not.
I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Shove your fallacy up your asslol
The Red Dawn fallacy.
And there are no ‘commies.’
I don't have either.Or they could just seize NRA and Hunting Licenses
The Militia is every single US citizen, public official or not + the National Guard.I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials.
George Mason the father of the bill of rights.
You would be so very wrongThe Militia is every single US citizen, public official or not + the National Guard.
The second is about the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms.Dude!
It is LITERALLY the FIRST four words of 2A!!!!
The RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE is the subject of the second amendment not the militia"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Registration isn't unconstitutional, it's keeping a searchable gun registry by the government that is....and there is law covering it:Where has any court decided that registration is unconstitutional?
Sorry, Mikey, you missed the boat.Thank you for proving my point.
As you prove here, James Madison did NOT write an individual's "right" to personal firearm ownership into the Second Amendment.
It was the SCOTUS legislating from the bench in 2008 that did it.
Very similar to the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that made abortion a constitutional "right."
Lijewise, someday a less conservative court may very well decide to overturn Heller....just like Roe.
At the end of the day it's all more about fashion than the Constitution.
Whatever is "fashionable" with the court today.
the right of the people to keep and bear arms
SCOTUS didn't legislate from the bench in 2008, they only affirmed the constitutional right.Keep:
to hold or retain in one's possession; hold as one's own: If you like it, keep it.
Officer, I was exercising my pursuit of happiness, while enjoying my liberty...... until your excessive speeding renders your license invalid.
IF, as you say, the SCOTUS only "affirmed a constitutional right" in the 2008 Heller case then the same statement MUST apply to the 1973 Roe v. Wade case.Sorry, Mikey, you missed the boat.
SCOTUS didn't legislate from the bench in 2008, they only affirmed the constitutional right.
Regarding Roe...SCOTUS cannot create constitutional rights. A constitutional right would be added to the constitution via an amendment, for which there is a process, defined, in the COTUS.
IF, as you say, the SCOTUS only "affirmed a constitutional right" in the 2008 Heller case then the same statement MUST apply to the 1973 Roe v. Wade case.
Either BOTH rulings simply affirmed a constitutional right or they were both cases of SCOTUS legislating from the bench.
And if the former is the case then the recent Dobbs v. Jackson ruling must be unconstitutional.
