I said this
Big words but no facts to support your statement. You can't prove (with facts) the OP being incorrect, can you?On the bright side, you folks that live completely divorced from reality are just peachy.
My expectations are couched in what he accomplished in his first admin. Accomplishments that were reversed by the ill advised actions of Biden and the democrats. I am not interested in your hysterical predictions of what you think might happen. Your "expectations" have proven to be sorely lacking evidenced by your blind support of four years of TOTAL FAILURES.
I voted for Trump based solely on his previous record of success in spite of an obstructionist congress. I really DGAF if he is a narcissist--what politician, including your addled loser, isn't? I want success for the country, parties be damned. I am an unapologetic American--not a globalist, as you clearly are.
Now link to ANYWHERE that I showed support for this nomination that hasn't been confirmed---didn't you just say that you didn't deal with WOULDA, COULDA, GONNA? Keep digging.
Meaning YOU CAN'T address the specific points made, right?
What "facts"? Your OP is entirely composed of vapid, inflammatory hyperbole, it's the common reason and evidence free swill that all people that engage in desperate attention seeking behavior prefer to serve up.
I will be honest with you. I truly HOPE that you are right and that I am wrong. This is not about my feelings but about the welfare of the nation I love.
At the risk of pressing you on a subject you seem reticent to discuss, is it the case that you don't actually care how your quality of life changes over the next few years? or are you simply evading the question altogether?
This is not hyperboleWhat "facts"? Your OP is entirely composed of vapid, inflammatory hyperbole, it's the common reason and evidence free swill that all people that engage in desperate attention seeking behavior prefer to serve up.
Thank You for your effort though.
Very well, if you don't support Hegseth being nominated as secretary of defense then I'll apologize, so for the record please state that you do not support that choice and why you don't support that choice?
Listen carefully as I have addressed this ad nauseum but it seems beyond your comprehension. My life was better prior to the democrat train wreck of the past four years. Based on past experiences, it is logical to deduce that the man in charge during that period will pick up where he left off. I am confident that two wars will cease. I am confident that illegal immigration will be throttled back. I am confident that the economy is going to improve. Is that clear now? If not, pull your head out of your ass or clean your stomach window.
He made a lot of mistakes during his first term, so what? He's already admitted all that, ostensibly has learned from it and is moving forward, what do you want him to do, live in the past? time travel perhaps?
For the record, did you support Biden? Did you support Harris? Did you support the DNC removing your voice to select a candidate? Did you support Harris lying to you about Biden's mental state? Did you support Biden pardoning his felon son? Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's all irrelevant straw man garbage too---just like every irrelevant non-point you've tried to make hay out of in this thread.
Lost in this is the fuzzy world of Joe's promises. And the nonexistent world of Kamala's promises. It is difficult to get all promises. Trump knows more this time around. And if the RINOS screw him over, we will shout their names into perpetuity. There is little concern anymore for traitors to the cause. The inflation. The inflation. The inflation.
Excuse me for not regarding acts of deceit as success.
Yes it's clear now but it wasn't clear until you made it clear.
www.statista.com
This is about the future and not the past. Kamala and Joe are no longer relevant in any way. Address the future and not the past.
