tigerred59
Gold Member
- Mar 17, 2015
- 21,276
- 2,884
- 290
- Banned
- #181
Trump approval ratings are great, if your an ant...you can see how low it really is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then 8 years of Ivanka, the first woman president.Just 5 more years to go!
As Donald Trump's media appearances demonstrate to the public how inept he is the approval rating is diving.
Donald Trump continually touted the rise of share prices as his prime quality. Now shares have fallen to pre-2017 levels. Shares have not risen during Trump's tenure and may fall even further as bankruptcies set in.
So far Donald Trump is blubbering and blithering. Will he burst into tears in public?
Is Trump Organization crashing?
Trump's Job Approval Rating Slips to 44%
![]()
Suddenly Rasmussen becomes a credible source for you?He's down 7 points. Yea Mr. Popular!!!
Please excuse the graphic, this is the only one I could find at USMB.
![]()
Trump Approval Index History - Rasmussen Reports®
No, I still don't consider Rasmussen to be credible, you guys do so I just wanted to update you on their latest.
people's lives have been turned upside down and this is what you concentrate on? Sad.
I'm simply demonstrating confirmation bias among the wingnuts. I have no idea how accurate this poll is and I'm not the only one keeping it alive.
IDC who the next POTUS is. I only care about getting this crisis behind us that has hurt so many people. Stock market is down heavily...who do you think this benefits as it allows them to buy stocks on the cheap? China anyone? Start the virus and benefit most from it. Hopefully the next President learns from this.
You have been handed your ass by numerous posters in your own thread..........and the best part about it is that you are too fucking stupid to realize it.Reutere/IPSOS is National you moron.Don't throw your back out running around with those goal posts, Loser.Dude, why do you insist on being embarrassed?
Emerson College Polling predicts electoral landslide for Clinton
That's not a national poll. That's a prediction based on looking at under polled individual states.
Now, please find a national poll like Rasmussen that shows an electoral college landlside. I can save you the trouble and say you won't find one but go ahead and look.
I can show you several links predicting a Hitlery Elecoral Landslide based on polls, but you would still deny reality. You are a typical Dimsocialist............facts and reality are your enemy.
This is what I said:
They did? I'm talking to national polls that don't measure the electoral college. You know, like the Rasmussen poll I posted.
And you didn't find a national poll. I don't know what else to tell you.
After a brutal week for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton maintained a substantial projected advantage in the race to win the Electoral College and claim the U.S. presidency, according to the latest results from the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project released on Saturday.
If the election were held this week, the project estimates that Clinton's odds of securing the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency at more than 95 percent, and by a margin of 118 Electoral College votes. It is the second week in a row that the project has estimated her odds so high.
The results mirror other Electoral College projections, some of which estimate Clinton's chance of winning at around 90 percent.
There is a 95 percent chance Hillary Clinton wins the Electoral College by 118 votes: poll
That's not a national poll that is called a prediction, specifically Reuters calls it the 'Sates of the Nation Project'.
Polls don't measure odds they measure public opinion. Isn't it nice that you get to learn something today?
You CLEARLY wet yourself when discovering this poll. You didn't even change your depends when posting it.Dig troll, dig deep.You found ONE RESPONSE that triggered your troll senses. ONEI don't need to look any further. You only have problems with polls when they don't agree with your opinion. You can prove me wrong if you want but you won't be able to.
Keep DIGGING PUPPET
Nope, I just posted a poll that the wingnuts love to use but only when it agress with their opinion and they are now having a difficult time processing it as you can see.
You are as stupid as the rest of them. Polls lol
Why? I don't put much stock in polls this far out, I'm just watching the reaction of others as they can't deal with the result they have posted in the past.
No, I still don't consider Rasmussen to be credible,
As Donald Trump's media appearances demonstrate to the public how inept he is the approval rating is diving.
Donald Trump continually touted the rise of share prices as his prime quality. Now shares have fallen to pre-2017 levels. Shares have not risen during Trump's tenure and may fall even further as bankruptcies set in.
So far Donald Trump is blubbering and blithering. Will he burst into tears in public?
Is Trump Organization crashing?
Trump's Job Approval Rating Slips to 44%
![]()
This is what this country moooooorrrrrreeee than deserves....we put kids in cages, rallied around evil politicians, gave the most corrupt human in our history a free get out of jail card, allowed him to degrade and humiliate everything and everybody but rednecks....folks we are so over due for tragedy, I just hope God's aim is fair.What a shitty president. what a shitty time for america...and the world!
Nothing shitty about today.You CLEARLY wet yourself when discovering this poll. You didn't even change your depends when posting it.Dig troll, dig deep.You found ONE RESPONSE that triggered your troll senses. ONE
Keep DIGGING PUPPET
Nope, I just posted a poll that the wingnuts love to use but only when it agress with their opinion and they are now having a difficult time processing it as you can see.
You are as stupid as the rest of them. Polls lol
Why? I don't put much stock in polls this far out, I'm just watching the reaction of others as they can't deal with the result they have posted in the past.
I didn't expect the reaction and for such a shitty day I'm kind of enjoying the ignorance on display.
You have been handed your ass by numerous posters in your own thread..........and the best part about it is that you are too fucking stupid to realize it.Reutere/IPSOS is National you moron.Don't throw your back out running around with those goal posts, Loser.That's not a national poll. That's a prediction based on looking at under polled individual states.
Now, please find a national poll like Rasmussen that shows an electoral college landlside. I can save you the trouble and say you won't find one but go ahead and look.
I can show you several links predicting a Hitlery Elecoral Landslide based on polls, but you would still deny reality. You are a typical Dimsocialist............facts and reality are your enemy.
This is what I said:
They did? I'm talking to national polls that don't measure the electoral college. You know, like the Rasmussen poll I posted.
And you didn't find a national poll. I don't know what else to tell you.
After a brutal week for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton maintained a substantial projected advantage in the race to win the Electoral College and claim the U.S. presidency, according to the latest results from the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project released on Saturday.
If the election were held this week, the project estimates that Clinton's odds of securing the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency at more than 95 percent, and by a margin of 118 Electoral College votes. It is the second week in a row that the project has estimated her odds so high.
The results mirror other Electoral College projections, some of which estimate Clinton's chance of winning at around 90 percent.
There is a 95 percent chance Hillary Clinton wins the Electoral College by 118 votes: poll
That's not a national poll that is called a prediction, specifically Reuters calls it the 'Sates of the Nation Project'.
Polls don't measure odds they measure public opinion. Isn't it nice that you get to learn something today?![]()
Are polls all you have? Poor guy lolYou have been handed your ass by numerous posters in your own thread..........and the best part about it is that you are too fucking stupid to realize it.Reutere/IPSOS is National you moron.Don't throw your back out running around with those goal posts, Loser.
I can show you several links predicting a Hitlery Elecoral Landslide based on polls, but you would still deny reality. You are a typical Dimsocialist............facts and reality are your enemy.
This is what I said:
They did? I'm talking to national polls that don't measure the electoral college. You know, like the Rasmussen poll I posted.
And you didn't find a national poll. I don't know what else to tell you.
After a brutal week for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton maintained a substantial projected advantage in the race to win the Electoral College and claim the U.S. presidency, according to the latest results from the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project released on Saturday.
If the election were held this week, the project estimates that Clinton's odds of securing the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency at more than 95 percent, and by a margin of 118 Electoral College votes. It is the second week in a row that the project has estimated her odds so high.
The results mirror other Electoral College projections, some of which estimate Clinton's chance of winning at around 90 percent.
There is a 95 percent chance Hillary Clinton wins the Electoral College by 118 votes: poll
That's not a national poll that is called a prediction, specifically Reuters calls it the 'Sates of the Nation Project'.
Polls don't measure odds they measure public opinion. Isn't it nice that you get to learn something today?![]()
I haven't.
I posted a Rasmussen poll that shows Trump down by 7. This is a poll that wingnuts post every time Trump is above 50% as though it means something. Now when he is down pretty low I get an earful about how polls aren't any good. Quite the hypocrisy.
Then there is people like you who don;t even know the difference between a poll and a prediction model. A national poll will not tell you a candidate as an X percentage chance of winning, that's not what they do. Sorry you're so damn dumb you don't even know why you're wrong.
What a shitty president. what a shitty time for america...and the world!
You have been handed your ass by numerous posters in your own thread..........and the best part about it is that you are too fucking stupid to realize it.Reutere/IPSOS is National you moron.Don't throw your back out running around with those goal posts, Loser.
I can show you several links predicting a Hitlery Elecoral Landslide based on polls, but you would still deny reality. You are a typical Dimsocialist............facts and reality are your enemy.
This is what I said:
They did? I'm talking to national polls that don't measure the electoral college. You know, like the Rasmussen poll I posted.
And you didn't find a national poll. I don't know what else to tell you.
After a brutal week for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Democrat Hillary Clinton maintained a substantial projected advantage in the race to win the Electoral College and claim the U.S. presidency, according to the latest results from the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project released on Saturday.
If the election were held this week, the project estimates that Clinton's odds of securing the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency at more than 95 percent, and by a margin of 118 Electoral College votes. It is the second week in a row that the project has estimated her odds so high.
The results mirror other Electoral College projections, some of which estimate Clinton's chance of winning at around 90 percent.
There is a 95 percent chance Hillary Clinton wins the Electoral College by 118 votes: poll
That's not a national poll that is called a prediction, specifically Reuters calls it the 'Sates of the Nation Project'.
Polls don't measure odds they measure public opinion. Isn't it nice that you get to learn something today?![]()
I haven't.
I posted a Rasmussen poll that shows Trump down by 7. This is a poll that wingnuts post every time Trump is above 50% as though it means something. Now when he is down pretty low I get an earful about how polls aren't any good. Quite the hypocrisy.
Then there is people like you who don;t even know the difference between a poll and a prediction model. A national poll will not tell you a candidate has an X percentage chance of winning, that's not what they do. Sorry you're so damn dumb you don't even know why you're wrong.
There is a need.Suddenly Rasmussen becomes a credible source for you?
No, I still don't consider Rasmussen to be credible, you guys do so I just wanted to update you on their latest.
people's lives have been turned upside down and this is what you concentrate on? Sad.
I'm simply demonstrating confirmation bias among the wingnuts. I have no idea how accurate this poll is and I'm not the only one keeping it alive.
IDC who the next POTUS is. I only care about getting this crisis behind us that has hurt so many people. Stock market is down heavily...who do you think this benefits as it allows them to buy stocks on the cheap? China anyone? Start the virus and benefit most from it. Hopefully the next President learns from this.
Then no need to be here, right?
Nothing shitty about today.You CLEARLY wet yourself when discovering this poll. You didn't even change your depends when posting it.Dig troll, dig deep.Nope, I just posted a poll that the wingnuts love to use but only when it agress with their opinion and they are now having a difficult time processing it as you can see.
You are as stupid as the rest of them. Polls lol
Why? I don't put much stock in polls this far out, I'm just watching the reaction of others as they can't deal with the result they have posted in the past.
I didn't expect the reaction and for such a shitty day I'm kind of enjoying the ignorance on display.
Made a nice wad of money at work. Preordered the new Half Life game on Steam. Had a nice ham steak dinner. Mocked a few leftist retards, you included.
A glorious day.