Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office

[Nostra]

Translation -- Your MAGA bullshit is weak, simp.

No translation needed.

You are a delusional, election denying loser.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

"Democrats Are Losing It… Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO)




Democrats continued their meltdown on Tuesday.

Democrat lawmakers are having such a difficult time with Elon Musk and Donald Trump rooting out waste, fraud and communism in the halls of the US Capitol.

On Tuesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) called for the impeachment of Elon Musk, who is not an elected official.

Democrats are so scared of what Elon is yet to find that they want to “impeach” him."

Democrats Are Losing It... Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

In a surprising turn of events, Rep. Jamie Raskin calls for the impeachment of Elon Musk, sparking fierce debate over the implications of such a move. What lies behind the Democrats' escalating concerns?

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The scary part is that Democrat voters are stupider than the idiots that they elect. Raskin is a clueless fool for speaking this type of nonsense.

Leftists just make up rules as they go. Meanwhile, "Trump's a threat to democracy and stuff".

 

[Nostra]

Horseshit, Trump is blatantly violating laws.

Trump Brazenly Defies Laws in Escalating Executive Power Grab

In the radical opening weeks of his second term, President Trump has appeared to feel little constraint by any need to show respect for the rule of law.

www.nytimes.com

Which laws AntonToo

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Leftists just make up rules as they go. Meanwhile, "Trump's a threat to democracy and stuff".

Musk, as a government employee, can be impeached, yes.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

No translation needed.

You are a delusional, election denying loser.

Trump winning the election doesn't mean he gets to break the law, you fucking imbecile.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Musk, as a government employee, can be impeached, yes.

Yeah sure, just like trump can be impeached, over and over again. All the Democracks need to do it pull some shit out of their ass reason, and waste time, dollars and credibility for their certain loss.

 

[dudmuck]

It does? How?

Be specific and bring links.

Federal judge partially blocks DOGE’s access to Treasury financial systems

Two DOGE-linked workers can still have read-only access to Bureau of Fiscal Service systems, per the ruling.

fedscoop.com

 

[Mr. Friscus]

1. SCOTUS rules POTUS can order a killing of political opponents and face no criminal prosecution because it would be a presidential act.

How would murder be a “presidential act”

LOL. Show me that precident. I’m all ears.

2. You try to refute that by saying Trump hasn't done that yet


It doesn't refute anything obviously.

If your message is Trump is going to murder his opposition… you’re one of the reasons why the left got smacked down in this election. Nobody buys your pathetic hyperbole.

 

[forkintheroad7]

"Democrats Are Losing It… Rep. Raskin Calls For Impeachment of Elon Musk Who Is NOT in Elected Office (VIDEO)



The scary part is that Democrat voters are stupider than the idiots that they elect. Raskin is a clueless fool for speaking this type of nonsense.

I love the word Stupider! LOL

It's technically not a word, but it made me laugh

Anyhow, I seriously (no political bias involved) do not understand how people like Ratkin get elected.. The only thing that explains it is ELECTION FRAUD... sigh.

 

[forkintheroad7]

So by the Constitution, since the only people who can be impeached are those who are elected (presumably the Constitution says or implies this?)

Then

If Ratkin et al get their way and the dims impeach Elon
that means Elon was as good as an elected person!

In which case, if the Senate (majority is R! ) does not impeach him and I'm sure they won't, he's good to go

Back to DOGE! And this time he IS elected!

Right?

lol

You dims aren't called dim for nothing

 

[WorldWatcher]

So by the Constitution, since the only people who can be impeached are those who are elected (presumably the Constitution says or implies this?)

Then

If Ratkin et al gets their way and the dims impeach Elon
that means Elon was as good as an elected person!

In which case, if the Senate (majority is R! ) does not impeach him and I'm sure they won't, he's good to go

Back to DOGE! And this time he IS elected!

Right?

lol

You dims aren't called dim for nothing

The Constitution doesn't limit impeachment to elected persons.

WW

 

[Nostra]

Trump winning the election doesn't mean he gets to break the law, you fucking imbecile.

List the law he broke, Simp.

 

[forkintheroad7]

If your message is Trump is going to murder his opposition… you’re one of the reasons why the left got smacked down in this election. Nobody buys your pathetic hyperbole.

There's got to be a better word in the English language than mere "hyperbole"

How about BS?

But it goes even beyond BS.

Maybe it's time to invent another word for the already HUGE lexicon (vocabulary) of the English language

Something that is more descriptive.. that says:

From-the-Depths-of-Hell

BS

 

[Lesh]

I'm trying to figure out why you feel the need to lie? " Raskin said on Monday. “I wish we had the power to impeach fake presidents too." and "Some people are talking about impeaching 'president Elon Musk' on the theory that he has usurped the presidency."

I get that reading is difficult for you but are you unable to recall what you have heard?

They just lie and expect everyone to believe the lies because they do

By the way… how IS Elmo held accountable??

 

[forkintheroad7]

The Constitution doesn't limit impeachment to elected persons.

WW

link?

I haven't read the Constitution in years so maybe you're right, but it would be nice to have a link... I just thought the Const may IMPLY
otherwise

Also, in the post you respond to by yours truly #130

I was saying things in jest (more/less)

 

[WorldWatcher]

link?

I haven't read the Constitution in years so maybe you're right, but it would be nice to have a link... I just thought the Const may IMPLY
otherwise

The United States Constitution – The U.S. Constitution Online – USConstitution.net - U.S. Constitution.net

The United States Constitution Vote 🗳️ Show Results 📊 (watch ad for results) View Next Poll ➡️ Today’s special event: March 16, 1751, is President James Madison‘s birthday. 50:50 groups call $0 $100 $200 Submit Final Answer The Constitution is presented in several ways on this site. This page...

www.usconstitution.net

WW

 

[Nostra]

Federal judge partially blocks DOGE’s access to Treasury financial systems

Two DOGE-linked workers can still have read-only access to Bureau of Fiscal Service systems, per the ruling.

fedscoop.com

That link doesn’t back up your claim, Simp.

Try again.

 

[dudmuck]

That link doesn’t back up your claim, Simp.

Try again.

my claim was doge was violating 1974 privacy act. Actually it wasnt my claim, i just read it all over the place, and then i gave you one of the places that i read that doge was violating the privacy act.

 

[Modern Messiah]

how often have we seen Trump going to church?

DOGE is doing a transparent audit regarding what are tax revenue is being spent on.
Do you have any control over how stupid your political overlords make you look and sound?
Keep holding the bag for leftists.
It's hilarious

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yeah sure, just like trump can be impeached, over and over again. All the Democracks need to do it pull some shit out of their ass reason, and waste time, dollars and credibility for their certain loss.

Not if Trump acts as President should: for all of the people.