buttercup
Diamond Member
- Apr 9, 2010
- 12,208
- 9,315
- 2,220
If you have a dog for years, most people stop seeing it as a basic animal. There are things we do with our pets that do not happen with cattle or pigs. We talk them for walks, let them sleep on the sofa or the bad, talk to them, snuggle with them, and love them.
My grandfather raised cattle. Never once did he name one. I asked him once why he didn't. His reply was "Never name something you plan to eat".
Of course people see dogs as pets (more than pets, part of the family) and other animals as 'food.' Honestly I don't want to take your thread more off topic, but I feel like I have to respond to what you just said. What a lot of people don't realize is that the animals you eat are no different than your dog or cat, in all the ways that matter. They are all sentient, they have individual personalities, they have emotions, they love to play and enjoy life just like your dog or cat, they don't want to be harmed or abused, they have a strong will to live, etc, etc.
So the only difference between an animal our culture considers a "pet" and an animal our culture considers "food" is your perception.
Check out this little pig, and see for yourself that she is no different than the dog she's playing with. In fact I've said this tons of times but I'll say it again. Pigs are even smarter than dogs. Yet they experience the most horrible, truly diabolical treatment in factory farms... so people can eat their corpse.
Choosing to not name an animal doesn't change the reality. It's just a coping mechanism to help someone feel OK with needlessly killing and eating an animal who is just as precious as your dog or cat.