Random thoughta

&

☭proletarian☭

Guest
Is it necessary to base a civil society upon Locke's ideals (for the society to accept condition of social equality and equal recognition of the 'value' of the human being, as well as to ascribe the rights to which they agree to some outside authroity? )regardless of whether they reflect reality (the unequal forms, conditions, and potentials of men, for instance)? (Must the Social Contract be grounded in truth?) Can tyranny of thought (such has been seen with the Church) be justified on these grounds?
 
Must the necessary division of labour always lead to antagonistic social interests between different market sectors? If so, can these parties be kept at ~ levels of power/influence w/out artificially manipulating market development?
 

Forum List

Back
Top