Rand Paul Slams "Partisan Cranks And Hacks" At MSNBC [VIDEO]...

[Pete7469]

"I prefer to pretend I didn't say that. Play along with me or I'll just take my marbles and go home."

I prefer to insist he said what he didn't say, because I'm programmed to regurgitate liberal bullshit until the narritive changes on Democratic Underground.

How's that fuckstick?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Rand Paul is right as MSNBC is nothing more than PARTISAN CRANKS AND HACKS!!! Nut cases.

But the same could be said about fox.....


Both are full of idiots and fools.

 

[Sallow]

The problem is you used Madcow, Madcow asks blacks because it makes him look bad... Why didn't she ask about not serving whites? Because as long as it appears that his position is only to not serve blacks or "minorities" you can call him a racist.

So your answer does not work as Rand Paul did not actually say what you wish so hard for him to say.

You lose again. But hey keep it up because in all honesty more and more people see the bullshit coming from the left (and the right) every year. Madcows rating shrink because she is not even a journalist, she's opinionated "news." As people realize there can be deeper answers to stances on issues you will only lose more and more voters. Dems lost 7 million voters last election, the most, ever. In fact both parties have always grown, Dems are the first to shrink. Reps caught up 2% from 2008 to 2014. Numbers are all out there, go look for yourself.

That was the transcript you asked for. That is what he said, now, he says he didn't say it.

Problem for you is that he did say it. He should just say he changed his mind about it if he did or, come right out and say he still believes private businesses operating in the public sphere should have the right to discriminate against anyone they wish.

You are incorrect. The original question was not about blacks or minorities, it was an open ended question and Rand answered it in depth. Madcow comes along and realizes she can then re-ask the question with specifics, avoiding an entirety.

To be clear and I wanted to avoid this, but by the post you did that I'm quoting it's obvious you understand Rand's actual position and that you prolly even agree with it. What I wanted to avoid was going back and directly having to quote the guy I was talking to and my question. Minorities was the word used, I bolded it and made it larger so that was clear. You are talking about blacks, blacks are not the only minority. I asked for text/video of Rand saying minorities.

You might not see a difference, but there is, because Madcows question leads her ignorant audience.

What's incorrect is the idea that Rand Paul didn't "understand" the whole civil rights movement was ABOUT private business refusing service to non white Americans or putting them in separate spaces. It STARTED at the Woolworth's lunch counter. This was the primary focus of it.

Add in, Rand Paul had in his entourage someone called the "Southern Avenger". Additionally? His father has displayed a good amount of racism.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz3PZSLjhmA]Ron Paul talks about secession... in front of the Confederate Flag - YouTube[/ame]

If Rand Paul really wants to be President? He's got to deal with this stuff, squarely and honestly.

 

[nodoginnafight]

"I prefer to pretend I didn't say that. Play along with me or I'll just take my marbles and go home."

I prefer to insist he said what he didn't say, because I'm programmed to regurgitate liberal bullshit until the narritive changes on Democratic Underground.

How's that fuckstick?

ewwww you mad.

Can't lie about the video.

Well, I guess you can. You just look stupid doing it. If that's OK with you, then it's fine with me.

 

[Pete7469]

Seeing the bed wetters sheeplishly chanting their script here on this thread indicates at least to me, that Rand Paul is a top contender in their "minds" (or whatever appendix they use for one).

When they are this dedicated to destroying someone, you know it's for a reason.

I can still remember all the bed wetters trashing everyone but Romney, and even touting his "moderate credentials" right up till everyone else was out of the picture.

Then it was "The Night of Long Knives", neo-nazi media style.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Any party that will be the first to drop the bull shit in focus on
1. Infrastructure investment
2. Education reform
3. science investment
4. r&d investment
5. minimum wage for all. Should be $10 bucks per hour.

The democrats have a lot of sense but there's a lot of idiocy that should be dropped. Idiocy divides this country instead of promoting a stronger country. Issues of race and sex are very damaging and harmful to this country.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Add in, Rand Paul had in his entourage someone called the "Southern Avenger". Additionally? His father has displayed a good amount of racism.

The Southern Avenger was more than an anonymous staffer ... he was his communications chief. And he was an avowed racist. So at the very least, Paul is very comfortable with racists.

Of course, if you choose not to ignore this as instructed, you're a commie.

 

[nodoginnafight]

I am PRAYING that the GOP can nominate someone a lot better than Rand Paul. Because I'm not looking forward to another Clinton administration. But that is EXACTLY what we'll get if Paul is nominated.

 

[ScienceRocks]

That was the transcript you asked for. That is what he said, now, he says he didn't say it.

Problem for you is that he did say it. He should just say he changed his mind about it if he did or, come right out and say he still believes private businesses operating in the public sphere should have the right to discriminate against anyone they wish.

You are incorrect. The original question was not about blacks or minorities, it was an open ended question and Rand answered it in depth. Madcow comes along and realizes she can then re-ask the question with specifics, avoiding an entirety.

To be clear and I wanted to avoid this, but by the post you did that I'm quoting it's obvious you understand Rand's actual position and that you prolly even agree with it. What I wanted to avoid was going back and directly having to quote the guy I was talking to and my question. Minorities was the word used, I bolded it and made it larger so that was clear. You are talking about blacks, blacks are not the only minority. I asked for text/video of Rand saying minorities.

You might not see a difference, but there is, because Madcows question leads her ignorant audience.

What's incorrect is the idea that Rand Paul didn't "understand" the whole civil rights movement was ABOUT private business refusing service to non white Americans or putting them in separate spaces. It STARTED at the Woolworth's lunch counter. This was the primary focus of it.

Add in, Rand Paul had in his entourage someone called the "Southern Avenger". Additionally? His father has displayed a good amount of racism.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz3PZSLjhmA]Ron Paul talks about secession... in front of the Confederate Flag - YouTube[/ame]

If Rand Paul really wants to be President? He's got to deal with this stuff, squarely and honestly.

This works as the democrats and black racism promotes the inability to reason with other people. It promotes violence like the knock out game and he's a good boy after he took part in blowing another black away. People getting angry is what happens when the people you attack can't reason any other way. We need to get away from it.

 

[BlindBoo]

The problem is you used Madcow, Madcow asks blacks because it makes him look bad... Why didn't she ask about not serving whites? Because as long as it appears that his position is only to not serve blacks or "minorities" you can call him a racist.

So your answer does not work as Rand Paul did not actually say what you wish so hard for him to say.

You lose again. But hey keep it up because in all honesty more and more people see the bullshit coming from the left (and the right) every year. Madcows rating shrink because she is not even a journalist, she's opinionated "news." As people realize there can be deeper answers to stances on issues you will only lose more and more voters. Dems lost 7 million voters last election, the most, ever. In fact both parties have always grown, Dems are the first to shrink. Reps caught up 2% from 2008 to 2014. Numbers are all out there, go look for yourself.

That was the transcript you asked for. That is what he said, now, he says he didn't say it.

Problem for you is that he did say it. He should just say he changed his mind about it if he did or, come right out and say he still believes private businesses operating in the public sphere should have the right to discriminate against anyone they wish.

You are incorrect. The original question was not about blacks or minorities, it was an open ended question and Rand answered it in depth. Madcow comes along and realizes she can then re-ask the question with specifics, avoiding an entirety.

To be clear and I wanted to avoid this, but by the post you did that I'm quoting it's obvious you understand Rand's actual position and that you prolly even agree with it. What I wanted to avoid was going back and directly having to quote the guy I was talking to and my question. Minorities was the word used, I bolded it and made it larger so that was clear. You are talking about blacks, blacks are not the only minority. I asked for text/video of Rand saying minorities.

You might not see a difference, but there is, because Madcows question leads her ignorant audience.

It doesn't matter if she specified a particular minority in her question. Would it have made a difference if she had said "Redskins". Do you think his position would be any different?

 

[Avorysuds]

But...he did directly say he opposes the government preventing private institutions from refusing to service minorities....

Do me the favor and back your claim up with text/video. Do it or I'll assume you are going off memory and are wrong. I need a direct quote. Go get it.

K

MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we
don't serve black people?

PAUL: Yes.

Thursday, May 20th - msnbc - Rachel Maddow show | NBC News

Ok, I watched Part 1 and 2 of the interview and:

MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we
don't serve black people?

PAUL: Yes.

never happened...

Part 1 [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U4FTd-1m-o]Rand Paul on Rachel Maddow Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]
Part 2 [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27r0y8hZGRo]Rand Paul on Rachel Maddow Part 2 - YouTube[/ame]

So, you lied, or were mistaken or you have an interview that I never saw, this is including the one you provided in the link as well.

Soooooo.... will swallow who thanked you apologize as well, will you? Nope, because you guys really don;t care about being right.

 

[Pete7469]

"I prefer to pretend I didn't say that. Play along with me or I'll just take my marbles and go home."

I prefer to insist he said what he didn't say, because I'm programmed to regurgitate liberal bullshit until the narritive changes on Democratic Underground.

How's that fuckstick?

ewwww you mad.

Can't lie about the video.

Well, I guess you can. You just look stupid doing it. If that's OK with you, then it's fine with me.

I don't need to lie about the video bed wetter. I don't need dipshit commie maggots like you to interprete reality to me either. That's not frustration on my part, it's pity.

Pity for the poor trees that waste time creating the oxygen you're stealing.

 

[Avorysuds]

Any party that will be the first to drop the bull shit in focus on
1. Infrastructure investment
2. Education reform
3. science investment
4. r&d investment
5. minimum wage for all. Should be $10 bucks per hour.

The democrats have a lot of sense but there's a lot of idiocy that should be dropped. Idiocy divides this country instead of promoting a stronger country. Issues of race and sex are very damaging and harmful to this country.

You are Truthmatters sock puppet I think... Only she could copy and paste the same crap over and over and never tire.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I am PRAYING that the GOP can nominate someone a lot better than Rand Paul. Because I'm not looking forward to another Clinton administration. But that is EXACTLY what we'll get if Paul is nominated.

Me neither, Clinton didn't promote science nearly enough and didn't have the kind of vision to advance this nation.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Any party that will be the first to drop the bull shit in focus on
1. Infrastructure investment
2. Education reform
3. science investment
4. r&d investment
5. minimum wage for all. Should be $10 bucks per hour.

The democrats have a lot of sense but there's a lot of idiocy that should be dropped. Idiocy divides this country instead of promoting a stronger country. Issues of race and sex are very damaging and harmful to this country.

You are Truthmatters sock puppet I think... Only she could copy and paste the same crap over and over and never tire.

You are a ******* fool. You hate this country and wish to see it back in 1786. Seriously, you're a fool and a tool for the super rich.

 

[Pete7469]

Add in, Rand Paul had in his entourage someone called the "Southern Avenger". Additionally? His father has displayed a good amount of racism.

The Southern Avenger was more than an anonymous staffer ... he was his communications chief. And he was an avowed racist. So at the very least, Paul is very comfortable with racists.

Of course, if you choose not to ignore this as instructed, you're a commie.

And the credible sources is.....


[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg[/ame]

 

[ScienceRocks]

Name one first world country that doesn't invest and promote what I am saying? Do it.

If you can't then stop promoting it.

 

[Pete7469]

Any party that will be the first to drop the bull shit in focus on
1. Infrastructure investment
2. Education reform
3. science investment
4. r&d investment
5. minimum wage for all. Should be $10 bucks per hour.

The democrats have a lot of sense but there's a lot of idiocy that should be dropped. Idiocy divides this country instead of promoting a stronger country. Issues of race and sex are very damaging and harmful to this country.

You are Truthmatters sock puppet I think... Only she could copy and paste the same crap over and over and never tire.

There is that "dad2three" muppet also.

 

[Pete7469]

So, you lied, or were mistaken or you have an interview that I never saw, this is including the one you provided in the link as well.

Soooooo.... will swallow who thanked you apologize as well, will you? Nope, because you guys really don;t care about being right.

They certainly do care about being right. They will demand to be right regardless of all facts and reality. Then when you point out how they're wrong you're a racist, uneducated, theocrat when you've proved they're wrong.

These parasites aren't even worth talking too.

 

[Sallow]

Do me the favor and back your claim up with text/video. Do it or I'll assume you are going off memory and are wrong. I need a direct quote. Go get it.

K

MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we
don't serve black people?

PAUL: Yes.

Thursday, May 20th - msnbc - Rachel Maddow show | NBC News

Ok, I watched Part 1 and 2 of the interview and:

MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we
don't serve black people?

PAUL: Yes.

never happened...

Part 1 [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U4FTd-1m-o]Rand Paul on Rachel Maddow Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]
Part 2 [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27r0y8hZGRo]Rand Paul on Rachel Maddow Part 2 - YouTube[/ame]

So, you lied, or were mistaken or you have an interview that I never saw, this is including the one you provided in the link as well.

.

<Vulgar homosexual comment removed>

MADDOW: Do you think that a private business has the right to say we

don't serve black people?

PAUL: Yes. I'm not in favor of any discrimination of any form. I

would never belong to any club that excluded anybody for race. We still do

have private clubs in America that can discriminate based on race.

That's the transcript.

You can't get away from it.