Rand Paul: Right-to-work laws 'would be great for the country'...will introduce legislation on that this week!

Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
 
Last edited:
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
Ya, no one does that is not how you get jobs. You base it on the market just like the rest of us. So do unions. In your mind you are worth what ever x amount you think you are worth or you do not take the job. It is based on money. So you are worried about money, by your definition you are greedy. The employer is worried about money, by your definition they are greedy. We are all out to maximize our income that is the free market system.
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
Ya, no one does that is not how you get jobs. You base it on the market just like the rest of us. So do unions. In your mind you are worth what ever x amount you think you are worth or you do not take the job. It is based on money. So you are worried about money, by your definition you are greedy. The employer is worried about money, by your definition they are greedy. We are all out to maximize our income that is the free market system.
after 45 yrs of working thats how it worked everytime,,,
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?
 
Curse them good union wages.
By the 1970’s unions had become their own worst enemy

lazy and incompetent workers were driving big corporations crazy

so the unions boasted high wages till the factory closed and moved to china
Yes the republican war on unions helped push lots of jobs to China.
no, unions, by artificially exploding the cost of labor drove jobs overseas
Funny.
Not really..
The war on unions made it acceptable to buy foreign.


Big Labor is by no means faultless at all, listen to how the union bosses earn a tremendous living off the backs of the working men on the docks.


While also increasing wages for many. Where is the promised prosperity when unions were gone? Repubs don’t talk about that anymore.

Unions increase wages for the few, their members, while driving non-members out. That's the entire point of a Union.

As far as your second comment/question....what do you mean? When have Unions been "gone" they aren't....they still exist. Maybe give me a time frame...there are, admittedly, a lot less, but mainly because people don't need them much anymore

More unions, more increased wages.

Our lack of wage growth, slow economy and growing inequality says they are needed.

Well no, that's happening because of Covid and Covid shut downs, not unions or the lack there of.

Prior to Covid, we saw real wage growth, and a booming economy.





You have some imagination. We saw weak wage growth driven by lots of min wage increases.


I agree, prior to the last admin for roughtly 40 years we saw weak growth, but as the evidence I provided shows, we saw real gains before Covid. The data I provided in the links proves that.

The data is weak and was fueled by min wage hikes.

why is it weak? do you have some evidence to support you claim it had anything to do with min wage hikes?

In Oregon, who did increase their min wage, UE skyrocketed....despite that, we still saw real wage increases nationally prior to Covid

It’s weak because the gains were weak and fueled by min wage increases.

As I highlighted the places with big min wage increases, saw more UE......your claim was debunked by actual data yet again

The gains weren't great, but the best they had been in over 40 years....

Your arguing that lots of min wage increases didn’t increase wages? That is funny. What’s your best data that wages were good?
 
Right To Work laws are one of the dumbest damn things I have ever heard of.

Who else but a stupid darnn sheep would buy the ideology / concept that Americans, born in this nation and protected by our Constitution, were / are born into 'slavery', that we are BORN the property of Unions, that we are not allowed to freely get a job in this country unless some politiciN passes a law freeing us from that slavery, allowing us to get a job without belonging to Unions?!

The indoctrination of Americans into socialist oppression began long ago....
 
Curse them good union wages.
By the 1970’s unions had become their own worst enemy

lazy and incompetent workers were driving big corporations crazy

so the unions boasted high wages till the factory closed and moved to china
Yes the republican war on unions helped push lots of jobs to China.
no, unions, by artificially exploding the cost of labor drove jobs overseas
Funny.
Not really..
The war on unions made it acceptable to buy foreign.


Big Labor is by no means faultless at all, listen to how the union bosses earn a tremendous living off the backs of the working men on the docks.


While also increasing wages for many. Where is the promised prosperity when unions were gone? Repubs don’t talk about that anymore.

Unions increase wages for the few, their members, while driving non-members out. That's the entire point of a Union.

As far as your second comment/question....what do you mean? When have Unions been "gone" they aren't....they still exist. Maybe give me a time frame...there are, admittedly, a lot less, but mainly because people don't need them much anymore

More unions, more increased wages.

Our lack of wage growth, slow economy and growing inequality says they are needed.

Well no, that's happening because of Covid and Covid shut downs, not unions or the lack there of.

Prior to Covid, we saw real wage growth, and a booming economy.





You have some imagination. We saw weak wage growth driven by lots of min wage increases.


I agree, prior to the last admin for roughtly 40 years we saw weak growth, but as the evidence I provided shows, we saw real gains before Covid. The data I provided in the links proves that.

The data is weak and was fueled by min wage hikes.

why is it weak? do you have some evidence to support you claim it had anything to do with min wage hikes?

In Oregon, who did increase their min wage, UE skyrocketed....despite that, we still saw real wage increases nationally prior to Covid

It’s weak because the gains were weak and fueled by min wage increases.

As I highlighted the places with big min wage increases, saw more UE......your claim was debunked by actual data yet again

The gains weren't great, but the best they had been in over 40 years....

Your arguing that lots of min wage increases didn’t increase wages? That is funny. What’s your best data that wages were good?

There weren't "lots of min wage increases" - there were some, that as we saw in Oregon drove up UE.

I've provided the data in my prior post, there are links...go a head and read it. Moreover, we are talking about REAL wage increases, min wage increases won't impact that, that's nominal wage increases. Under Trump we saw for the first time in nearly forty years REAL wage increases.
 
Curse them good union wages.
By the 1970’s unions had become their own worst enemy

lazy and incompetent workers were driving big corporations crazy

so the unions boasted high wages till the factory closed and moved to china
Yes the republican war on unions helped push lots of jobs to China.
no, unions, by artificially exploding the cost of labor drove jobs overseas
Funny.
Not really..
The war on unions made it acceptable to buy foreign.


Big Labor is by no means faultless at all, listen to how the union bosses earn a tremendous living off the backs of the working men on the docks.


While also increasing wages for many. Where is the promised prosperity when unions were gone? Repubs don’t talk about that anymore.

Unions increase wages for the few, their members, while driving non-members out. That's the entire point of a Union.

As far as your second comment/question....what do you mean? When have Unions been "gone" they aren't....they still exist. Maybe give me a time frame...there are, admittedly, a lot less, but mainly because people don't need them much anymore

More unions, more increased wages.

Our lack of wage growth, slow economy and growing inequality says they are needed.

Well no, that's happening because of Covid and Covid shut downs, not unions or the lack there of.

Prior to Covid, we saw real wage growth, and a booming economy.





You have some imagination. We saw weak wage growth driven by lots of min wage increases.


I agree, prior to the last admin for roughtly 40 years we saw weak growth, but as the evidence I provided shows, we saw real gains before Covid. The data I provided in the links proves that.

The data is weak and was fueled by min wage hikes.

why is it weak? do you have some evidence to support you claim it had anything to do with min wage hikes?

In Oregon, who did increase their min wage, UE skyrocketed....despite that, we still saw real wage increases nationally prior to Covid

It’s weak because the gains were weak and fueled by min wage increases.

As I highlighted the places with big min wage increases, saw more UE......your claim was debunked by actual data yet again

The gains weren't great, but the best they had been in over 40 years....

Your arguing that lots of min wage increases didn’t increase wages? That is funny. What’s your best data that wages were good?

There weren't "lots of min wage increases" - there were some, that as we saw in Oregon drove up UE.

I've provided the data in my prior post, there are links...go a head and read it. Moreover, we are talking about REAL wage increases, min wage increases won't impact that, that's nominal wage increases. Under Trump we saw for the first time in nearly forty years REAL wage increases.


You don’t have a piece of data to share? Why would I have to read through yiur garbage links? Give your best data.
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?


whats the job???
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?


whats the job???
What job are you worth the most for?
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?


whats the job???
What job are you worth the most for?


sex,,,
 
Curse them good union wages.
By the 1970’s unions had become their own worst enemy

lazy and incompetent workers were driving big corporations crazy

so the unions boasted high wages till the factory closed and moved to china
Yes the republican war on unions helped push lots of jobs to China.
no, unions, by artificially exploding the cost of labor drove jobs overseas
Funny.
Not really..
The war on unions made it acceptable to buy foreign.


Big Labor is by no means faultless at all, listen to how the union bosses earn a tremendous living off the backs of the working men on the docks.


While also increasing wages for many. Where is the promised prosperity when unions were gone? Repubs don’t talk about that anymore.

Unions increase wages for the few, their members, while driving non-members out. That's the entire point of a Union.

As far as your second comment/question....what do you mean? When have Unions been "gone" they aren't....they still exist. Maybe give me a time frame...there are, admittedly, a lot less, but mainly because people don't need them much anymore

More unions, more increased wages.

Our lack of wage growth, slow economy and growing inequality says they are needed.

Well no, that's happening because of Covid and Covid shut downs, not unions or the lack there of.

Prior to Covid, we saw real wage growth, and a booming economy.





You have some imagination. We saw weak wage growth driven by lots of min wage increases.


I agree, prior to the last admin for roughtly 40 years we saw weak growth, but as the evidence I provided shows, we saw real gains before Covid. The data I provided in the links proves that.

The data is weak and was fueled by min wage hikes.

why is it weak? do you have some evidence to support you claim it had anything to do with min wage hikes?

In Oregon, who did increase their min wage, UE skyrocketed....despite that, we still saw real wage increases nationally prior to Covid

It’s weak because the gains were weak and fueled by min wage increases.

As I highlighted the places with big min wage increases, saw more UE......your claim was debunked by actual data yet again

The gains weren't great, but the best they had been in over 40 years....

Your arguing that lots of min wage increases didn’t increase wages? That is funny. What’s your best data that wages were good?

There weren't "lots of min wage increases" - there were some, that as we saw in Oregon drove up UE.

I've provided the data in my prior post, there are links...go a head and read it. Moreover, we are talking about REAL wage increases, min wage increases won't impact that, that's nominal wage increases. Under Trump we saw for the first time in nearly forty years REAL wage increases.


You don’t have a piece of data to share? Why would I have to read through yiur garbage links? Give your best data.

I already did....repeatedly, I am sorry you don't understand them, or apparently don't even want to read to educate yourself, but then again....you are a guy that doesn't know the difference between Real Wages, and Nominal Wages, and are out here trying to have a discussion about the topic....so I can't say I'm surprised
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?


whats the job???
What job are you worth the most for?


sex,,,
Ya, how much have you earned doing that job? Also illegal to charge for unless in certain parts of Nevada.
 
Unions have outlived their usefulness .
Our weak wage growth disagrees with you.
So you want your merit raises to be figured commutatively instead of being based on your merit instead of the groups merit?
Sure worked better for wages. Wage growth has been weak with the decline in unions.
only greedy people worry about the money,,
Ya,go work for freethen ass hole. The billionaires should have no problem giving their money away till they are middle class or poor.


that would be pretty stupid,,
I figure I would see what they want to pay and decide from there,, if I took the job I would do my best to give them their moneys worth and hopefully perform in a manor they would want to pay me more for,,,

if not its a free country and I can move on,,
So you are one of those greedy people. Ya me too.

how so?? I dont ask for what I'm not worth,,,
You said only greedy people care about money yet you say money is part of the decision on weather or not to take the job. So that makes you one of the greedy people. Ok for you to decide what you are worth but no one else I get it.


I focus on the work and the money will follow,,,

greed is pay "me more and maybe I will work harder"

and where did I say I decided what I was worth?? I clearly said my ability to do the job determines what I'm worth,,,
I can tell this is going to go in circles. In your mind you have an amount you think you are worth. You will not work for less right?
?


whats the job???
What job are you worth the most for?


sex,,,
Ya, how much have you earned doing that job? Also illegal to charge for unless in certain parts of Nevada.


who said I charged for it??

you asked what job was worth the most to me,,

I would love to make 1K a pop for sex,,,

youre running in circles is counter productive,,

heres how it works,,
I apply for a job at a trash company and they say they will pay me 7.00 an hr to come in at 3 in the morning and start the trucks in the winter,, cause its cold and trucks dont start that good in the cold,,

I told them no thank you and went about my way and someone willing to do it for that amount stepped up and took the job,,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top