Rand Paul doubles down on big, beautiful bill criticism after Trump slam

[pknopp]

Didn't seem to bother you when Auto-Pen was doing it at record levels.

I condemned every single one of his bills but rant if you must.

 

[Zincwarrior]

He should be careful. MAGA might kill him.

 

[leftwinger]

Thats not an answer. Heis literally the head of the movement. He can threaten to primary any member opposing him - and has. He can refuse to sign.

Why is he wanting to get rid of the debt limit?

Un-NO. He has about 1.5 years to fix this mess befor mid-term D Election fraud revs up. Look at what NuScum did to CA voting. Good Lord yo peole are insane about so much.

It will take decades to get a clean honest Congress. Maybe impossible when you have Flakes & Chainey Mittens TomCollins Murky, Along with your Sanders PAclown in sweatpants. Bartender & Dancing Crockett types. Give it up Lunatics. You own it.

 

[leftwinger]

Them why tax breaks for the rich?

Because the 2017 SALT CAP lit up Schumer & Piglousy phones with Coastal elites going Bezerk about $250K property tax bills no longer 40% subsidized. Congress rammed that cut thru in the last two weeks in secret.

What you people don’t seem to get, Congress is ALL the countries problems. Wake the blank up dummies.

 

[leftwinger]

I am no longer going to be willing to “educate” Board Stain on old issues. They post rants, lies, media Spin, whatever, all just to get attention.

I quit for over two years here, yet I see no improvement in 98.75% of Board Stain posters. dumb and dirty dishonest gaggle of phonies for certain they is. Stain really suck. Few decent ideas from DEM deep state swine.

LAND O GOSHEN!

 

[Zincwarrior]

Un-NO. He has about 1.5 years to fix this mess befor mid-term D Election fraud revs up. Look at what NuScum did to CA voting. Good Lord yo peole are insane about so much.

It will take decades to get a clean honest Congress. Maybe impossible when you have Flakes & Chainey Mittens TomCollins Murky, Along with your Sanders PAclown in sweatpants. Bartender & Dancing Crockett types. Give it up Lunatics. You own it.

Deficits went up in his first term too. You fuckers and Orange Jesus owns this.

 

[Billiejeens]

He'll now be labeled a traitor by MAGA and they'll demand he be primaried.

Is him being in office a benefit to his party?

 

[Invisibleflash]

He'll now be labeled a traitor by MAGA and they'll demand he be primaried.

Don't forget Massie. Get rid of them both, so Trump can have a full team of ass lickers!

 

[Billiejeens]

Don't forget Massie. Get rid of them both, so Trump can have a full team of ass lickers!

View attachment 1118973

Is Massie being in office good for his party?

 

[mudwhistle]

He should be careful. MAGA might kill him.

Yeah....sure.....MAGA keeps killing Jews N' stuff.

 

[Mac-7]

I don’t know what your first sentence means.

Yes. Cutting taxes adds to the debt. Less money coming in means more borrowing to pay for the spending. Don’t be a child.

No kidding

What I meant to say was

Except that when you increase spending that always adds to the national debt

Cutting taxes does not add to the debt if tax revenue stays the same or goes up

 

[Mac-7]

Them why tax breaks for the rich?

Because the rich invest their money back into the economy which keads to more tax revenue

 

[skye]

 

[Marener]

No kidding

What I meant to say was

Except that when you increase spending that always adds to the national debt

Cutting taxes does not add to the debt if tax revenue stays the same or goes up

No one is talking about increasing spending.

Cutting taxes adds the the debt if tax revenue is lower than it would have been if you hadn’t cut taxes. This isn’t that complicated. I’m sure you can understand it but you don’t want to.

 

[j-mac]

No one is talking about increasing spending.

Cutting taxes adds the the debt if tax revenue is lower than it would have been if you hadn’t cut taxes. This isn’t that complicated. I’m sure you can understand it but you don’t want to.

Except,

1. No one is cutting spending either.

2. Historically tax cuts lead to greater revenue.

Explain those please.

 

[Mac-7]

No one is talking about increasing spending.

You didnt have too till I brought it up

Are you committing to zero spending increases?

More to the point can congress restrain itself from more spending if the higher taxes pay off for you?

 

[Marener]

Except,

1. No one is cutting spending either.

2. Historically tax cuts lead to greater revenue.

Explain those please.

Tax cuts don’t lead to greater revenue. It’s a myth you’ve been told.

 

[Marener]

You didnt have too till I brought it up

Are you committing to zero spending increases?

More to the point can congress restrain itself from more spending if the higher taxes pay off for you?

You brought it up because your argument is garbage and you can’t stick to it.

Sure. Zero spending increases. Let’s do it. That means your social security check is shrinking next year.

 

[buttercup]

Don't forget Massie. Get rid of them both, so Trump can have a full team of ass lickers!

View attachment 1118973

Massie and Rand are bad, but the wicked witch Democrat Gretchen Whitmer has done an "excellent" job according to NY liberal Trump. Oh, and Mike Johnson and Lindsay Graham too!

I guess we're in upside-down land these days.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Except that when you increase dpending to add to the nationsl debt

Cutting taxes does not add to the debt

Sigh..yes...cutting taxes DOES increase the debt.
Money in => less....

Math...101.