Rand Paul detained by TSA

I guess you think the 4th Amendment doesn't apply to Rand Paul?

Is that the Amendment that outlines our Right to Travel By Air?


I guess "freedom of movement" only applies to walking, horseback, stagecoach and schooner.

images


Ha ha ha

You dumb bastard, that's not a schooner it's a sailboat.
 
Last edited:
The rules shouldn't apply to anyone.

Perhaps....but regardless, the rules apply to everyone...and until the rules are changed they should continue to apply to everyone.

I wonder how Mr. Paul would have felt if a man in muslim garb rang off the detector bell and the man refused a patdown and the TSA let him through anyway.....

Civil disobedience is a way to change bad rules. Hopefully everyone refuses to submit to TSA nonsense.

Rand Paul wants to abolish the TSA, so what do you think?

Civil disobedience only counts if you are a OWS, loony-toons moron. Decent working people are not permitted to use CD as a way to demonstrate they disagreement.
 
Meanwhile people are still getting on board airplanes with guns.

How many would get on using Rand Paul's screening?

I don't know. I'm not naive enough to think I can predict something like that.

Why don't you enlighten me on what "Rand Paul's screening" is though.

Best I can tell it is to allow the airlines to decide how much screening they need. Let the free market decide whether safety is necessary or not
 
I guess you think the 4th Amendment doesn't apply to Rand Paul?

Is that the Amendment that outlines our Right to Travel By Air?


I guess "freedom of movement" only applies to walking, horseback, stagecoach and schooner.

If I have to pay someone to transport me, then I should be subject to whatever restrictions, guidelines, etc., they choose to impose, unless said restrictions violate established law.

If I don't like said rules/regulations/guidelines, I am free to choose another mode of transport.

I do NOT have a constitutional right to travel with a particular company, or by a particular method.
 
Civil disobedience only counts if you are a OWS, loony-toons moron. Decent working people are not permitted to use CD as a way to demonstrate they disagreement.

Article 15 and his ilk have been indoctrinated to accepting government supremacy and tyranny. They wonder why Sen Rand Paul hasn't.

.
 
How many would get on using Rand Paul's screening?

I don't know. I'm not naive enough to think I can predict something like that.

Why don't you enlighten me on what "Rand Paul's screening" is though.

Best I can tell it is to allow the airlines to decide how much screening they need. Let the free market decide whether safety is necessary or not

This is so ******* ridiculous.

Do you think an airline company is going to forgo strict security measures and allow their airline to be a poster child for who NOT to fly with?

Government isn't always the best solution. Deal with it.
 
Civil disobedience only counts if you are a OWS, loony-toons moron. Decent working people are not permitted to use CD as a way to demonstrate they disagreement.

Article 15 and his ilk have been indoctrinated to accepting government supremacy and tyranny. They wonder why Sen Rand Paul hasn't.

.

I am not pro that law by any means...but I acept it...and fly as little as I need to.

But to ignore the valid reason for it is just plain old disingenuous.

I do not see it as tyrannical by any means. I see it sa government doing one of the things it is designed to do...protect the people...

Sometimes it is best to understand the sentiments of those you disagree with....not intentionally spin it so you can sound right and them sound completely wrong.
 
Is that the Amendment that outlines our Right to Travel By Air?


I guess "freedom of movement" only applies to walking, horseback, stagecoach and schooner.

If I have to pay someone to transport me, then I should be subject to whatever restrictions, guidelines, etc., they choose to impose, unless said restrictions violate established law.

If I don't like said rules/regulations/guidelines, I am free to choose another mode of transport.

I do NOT have a constitutional right to travel with a particular company, or by a particular method.
What you describe here would be a free market system. This is not what we have. What we have is a government agency assuming they have probable cause to search every man, woman and child in america.
 
15th post
Paulie,

Domestic airspace travel is as much the Government's jurisdiction as public roads are. That's why, in order to drive a car - you have to submit to a driver's test, a 5 hour course and have a car deemed "passed" of an inspection. There's also State Troopers monitoring speed limits, etc. and a slew of other safety measures in place.

These things began decades and decades ago and we're still not getting single file marched into fema camps and unable to speak our minds.
 
I don't know. I'm not naive enough to think I can predict something like that.

Why don't you enlighten me on what "Rand Paul's screening" is though.

Best I can tell it is to allow the airlines to decide how much screening they need. Let the free market decide whether safety is necessary or not

This is so ******* ridiculous.

Do you think an airline company is going to forgo strict security measures and allow their airline to be a poster child for who NOT to fly with?

Government isn't always the best solution. Deal with it.

How would airlines handle passenger complaints? If they start to lose customers because of security screening, what will they do about it? If a competing airline cuts back on security and starts to draw more passengers....how will they respond?
 
Back
Top Bottom