Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What chu talkin' about Willis?One ID, one Vote cures this
ONCE AGAIN....this shows that voter ID WOULD NOT stop this kind of fraud!
Most communities don't allocate the resources to purge voter roles. It is easier to just drop people who have not voted in three yearsRepublicans invented cheatingThis story only proves that Republicans don't know how to cheat. These three suspects use their own name twice. Democrats would have used the name of a neighbor that moved away, a dead person or a person that know isn't going to vote. These 3 people were bound to get caught. You'll never get caught if you use another person's name unless you live in a state with voter ID laws. However, they did vote twice. Their votes will still be counted. I don't know what their sentence will be but I bet it will be minimal and laughable.
They do it on a grand scale through voter suppression, gerrymander and voter intimidation
I think we should purge the voter rolls of dead people, people that moved away and people that sit out 3+ presidential elections. Citizens should also be required to bring their voter registration card with them to vote.
I have no problem with arresting all the republicans that cheat and killing them.
Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
Most communities don't allocate the resources to purge voter roles. It is easier to just drop people who have not voted in three yearsRepublicans invented cheatingThis story only proves that Republicans don't know how to cheat. These three suspects use their own name twice. Democrats would have used the name of a neighbor that moved away, a dead person or a person that know isn't going to vote. These 3 people were bound to get caught. You'll never get caught if you use another person's name unless you live in a state with voter ID laws. However, they did vote twice. Their votes will still be counted. I don't know what their sentence will be but I bet it will be minimal and laughable.
They do it on a grand scale through voter suppression, gerrymander and voter intimidation
I think we should purge the voter rolls of dead people, people that moved away and people that sit out 3+ presidential elections. Citizens should also be required to bring their voter registration card with them to vote.
I have no problem with arresting all the republicans that cheat and killing them.
Yeah someone voting twice is rampant
Given that individual voter fraud is so rare, one case constitutes as rampant
I can show you the USMB conservative threads to prove it
Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
The science of gerrymandering districts is an insult to democracy
Most communities don't allocate the resources to purge voter roles. It is easier to just drop people who have not voted in three yearsRepublicans invented cheatingThis story only proves that Republicans don't know how to cheat. These three suspects use their own name twice. Democrats would have used the name of a neighbor that moved away, a dead person or a person that know isn't going to vote. These 3 people were bound to get caught. You'll never get caught if you use another person's name unless you live in a state with voter ID laws. However, they did vote twice. Their votes will still be counted. I don't know what their sentence will be but I bet it will be minimal and laughable.
They do it on a grand scale through voter suppression, gerrymander and voter intimidation
I think we should purge the voter rolls of dead people, people that moved away and people that sit out 3+ presidential elections. Citizens should also be required to bring their voter registration card with them to vote.
I have no problem with arresting all the republicans that cheat and killing them.
Three years or three presidential elections?
That is not how gerrymandering is done. If a state has ten districts, republicans will set aside two districts that are 90% Democratic. The remaining eight will be 60-40 Republican. That way Republicans will get eight districts while democrats get two even though democrats may have a larger percentage of population.Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
The science of gerrymandering districts is an insult to democracy
The lines have to go somewhere. If you create a democrat favored district then the district next to it will be a republican favored district. If you create a republican favored district then the district next to it will be a democrat favored district. If you create a black favored district then the district next to it will be a white favored district. Gerrymandering doesn't accomplish anything in the big scheme. It might benefit a few individuals to get elected but it doesn't create a majority. If you have to create 13 districts in Alabama then you have to create 13 districts in Alabama. Everybody in Alabama still gets to vote. You can draw the lines however you want but the ratio of republican districts to democratic districts will be exactly the same no matter where you draw those lines. You can do a favor for one congressman to keep him in office or to get him elected but it doesn't create an artificial majority.
Do you know where the term Gerrymandering came from? Elbridge Gerrry created a district that looked like a salamander to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some creative journalist combined the word Gerry and salamander. The one salamander shaped district that Elbridge Gerry created was won by the Democratic-Republican Party but the Federalist Party kept the majority. It worked but it didn't work. The lines had to go somewhere. If he would have drawn the lines to look more like a dog then maybe it would have worked out differently but the overall result would have been exactly the same.
Most communities don't allocate the resources to purge voter roles. It is easier to just drop people who have not voted in three yearsRepublicans invented cheatingThis story only proves that Republicans don't know how to cheat. These three suspects use their own name twice. Democrats would have used the name of a neighbor that moved away, a dead person or a person that know isn't going to vote. These 3 people were bound to get caught. You'll never get caught if you use another person's name unless you live in a state with voter ID laws. However, they did vote twice. Their votes will still be counted. I don't know what their sentence will be but I bet it will be minimal and laughable.
They do it on a grand scale through voter suppression, gerrymander and voter intimidation
I think we should purge the voter rolls of dead people, people that moved away and people that sit out 3+ presidential elections. Citizens should also be required to bring their voter registration card with them to vote.
I have no problem with arresting all the republicans that cheat and killing them.
Three years or three presidential elections?
Three presidential elections are 12 years. I don't know any community that will keep you active that long
Voter fraud suspect arrested in Des Moines
POLK COUNTY, Iowa — A Des Moines woman has been arrested on suspicion of voting twice this month in the general election, police and court records show.
Terri Lynn Rote, 55, was booked into the Polk County Jail about 3:40 p.m. Thursday on a first-degree election misconduct charge, which is a Class D felony.
Rote, a registered Republican, reportedly cast an early voting ballot at the Polk County Election Office, and another ballot at a county satellite voting location in Des Moines, according to a Des Moines police report.
.
That is not how gerrymandering is done. If a state has ten districts, republicans will set aside two districts that are 90% Democratic. The remaining eight will be 60-40 Republican. That way Republicans will get eight districts while democrats get two even though democrats may have a larger percentage of population.Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
The science of gerrymandering districts is an insult to democracy
The lines have to go somewhere. If you create a democrat favored district then the district next to it will be a republican favored district. If you create a republican favored district then the district next to it will be a democrat favored district. If you create a black favored district then the district next to it will be a white favored district. Gerrymandering doesn't accomplish anything in the big scheme. It might benefit a few individuals to get elected but it doesn't create a majority. If you have to create 13 districts in Alabama then you have to create 13 districts in Alabama. Everybody in Alabama still gets to vote. You can draw the lines however you want but the ratio of republican districts to democratic districts will be exactly the same no matter where you draw those lines. You can do a favor for one congressman to keep him in office or to get him elected but it doesn't create an artificial majority.
Do you know where the term Gerrymandering came from? Elbridge Gerrry created a district that looked like a salamander to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some creative journalist combined the word Gerry and salamander. The one salamander shaped district that Elbridge Gerry created was won by the Democratic-Republican Party but the Federalist Party kept the majority. It worked but it didn't work. The lines had to go somewhere. If he would have drawn the lines to look more like a dog then maybe it would have worked out differently but the overall result would have been exactly the same.
That is not how gerrymandering is done. If a state has ten districts, republicans will set aside two districts that are 90% Democratic. The remaining eight will be 60-40 Republican. That way Republicans will get eight districts while democrats get two even though democrats may have a larger percentage of population.Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
The science of gerrymandering districts is an insult to democracy
The lines have to go somewhere. If you create a democrat favored district then the district next to it will be a republican favored district. If you create a republican favored district then the district next to it will be a democrat favored district. If you create a black favored district then the district next to it will be a white favored district. Gerrymandering doesn't accomplish anything in the big scheme. It might benefit a few individuals to get elected but it doesn't create a majority. If you have to create 13 districts in Alabama then you have to create 13 districts in Alabama. Everybody in Alabama still gets to vote. You can draw the lines however you want but the ratio of republican districts to democratic districts will be exactly the same no matter where you draw those lines. You can do a favor for one congressman to keep him in office or to get him elected but it doesn't create an artificial majority.
Do you know where the term Gerrymandering came from? Elbridge Gerrry created a district that looked like a salamander to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some creative journalist combined the word Gerry and salamander. The one salamander shaped district that Elbridge Gerry created was won by the Democratic-Republican Party but the Federalist Party kept the majority. It worked but it didn't work. The lines had to go somewhere. If he would have drawn the lines to look more like a dog then maybe it would have worked out differently but the overall result would have been exactly the same.
Eliminated?That is not how gerrymandering is done. If a state has ten districts, republicans will set aside two districts that are 90% Democratic. The remaining eight will be 60-40 Republican. That way Republicans will get eight districts while democrats get two even though democrats may have a larger percentage of population.Gerrymandering is a science
It goes beyond just the accidental placement of district boundaries
If you created a constitutional amendment that prohibited gerrymandering then it wouldn't stop. It's impossible to enforce. The lines have to go somewhere.
When people scream "GERRYMANDERING" it drastically insults my intelligence. I don't like to be insulted. The lines have to go somewhere.
The science of gerrymandering districts is an insult to democracy
The lines have to go somewhere. If you create a democrat favored district then the district next to it will be a republican favored district. If you create a republican favored district then the district next to it will be a democrat favored district. If you create a black favored district then the district next to it will be a white favored district. Gerrymandering doesn't accomplish anything in the big scheme. It might benefit a few individuals to get elected but it doesn't create a majority. If you have to create 13 districts in Alabama then you have to create 13 districts in Alabama. Everybody in Alabama still gets to vote. You can draw the lines however you want but the ratio of republican districts to democratic districts will be exactly the same no matter where you draw those lines. You can do a favor for one congressman to keep him in office or to get him elected but it doesn't create an artificial majority.
Do you know where the term Gerrymandering came from? Elbridge Gerrry created a district that looked like a salamander to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some creative journalist combined the word Gerry and salamander. The one salamander shaped district that Elbridge Gerry created was won by the Democratic-Republican Party but the Federalist Party kept the majority. It worked but it didn't work. The lines had to go somewhere. If he would have drawn the lines to look more like a dog then maybe it would have worked out differently but the overall result would have been exactly the same.
It doesn't matter how you draw the lines. You can be fair as fuck and someone is going to cry fowl. The lines have to be redrawn every ten years. If you leave the lines in the exact same place then it would be illegal. People don't like change but population shifts requires the lines to be redrawn to make sure there is equal representation of the people in congress. The lines have to be redrawn. There will always be dumb ass whiny babies to cry that it was done in a disadvantageous manner. It is foolish gibberish. Gerrymandering will never be stopped without eliminating congress as it was created.
Do you really think there is a way to stop the tears? Gerrymandering is a reality that can't be corrected. Does that make sense? It will always be done as long as we want a congress that is representative of the population.
Since you are serious then tell me how you eliminate Gerrymandering. I don't believe you have a solution. Do you know how I know that you have no solution? Easy. It's because it isn't a problem.
