Ramifications of the 1/6 Storming of the Capitol Building.

How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.
They didn't get their hands on any representatives or senators, fortunately.
Once they got inside, they didnt seem like they were hunting anyone. Their demeanor was jovial. They were taking selfies with the cops for Christ sake. :cuckoo:
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.
They didn't get their hands on any representatives or senators, fortunately.
Once they got inside, they didnt seem like they were hunting anyone. Their demeanor was jovial. They were taking selfies with the cops for Christ sake. :cuckoo:
Not all of them.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.
They didn't get their hands on any representatives or senators, fortunately.
Once they got inside, they didnt seem like they were hunting anyone. Their demeanor was jovial. They were taking selfies with the cops for Christ sake. :cuckoo:
Not all of them.
I havent seen any that werent jovial.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
These people taking selfies with cops didnt have the demeanor of an angry mob who was hunting down congressmen.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
These people taking selfies with cops didnt have the demeanor of an angry mob who was hunting down congressmen.

Plenty of video on it. All you have to do search. Here's a small snippet. You can hear the protesters in the background. Do they sound jovial? BTW, I can't tell if the woman at the end was a Congresswoman or a protester. I can't really make out her words.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
These people taking selfies with cops didnt have the demeanor of an angry mob who was hunting down congressmen.

Plenty of video on it. All you have to do search. Here's a small snippet. You can hear the protesters in the background. Do they sound jovial? BTW, I can't tell if the woman at the end was a Congresswoman or a protester. I can't really make out her words.

All i heard were the people inside the building. What a dud of a video.
 
The purpose of this thread is to analyze both the long and short-term ramifications of the 1/6 siege of the Capitol Building.


The only ramification of 1/6 is that every effort was made to settle the questions and evidence of the election peacefully within the system and they were all blocked, refused, ridiculed and denied, so now you've seen the first of what will undoubtedly be many increasingly stronger and more violent efforts OUTSIDE the system to remove that flabby illegal bum from the WH by peiople who simply refuse to live under a totalitarian socialist autocracy.

WELCOME TO THE BIDEN YEARS.

BROUGHT TO US BY NANCY AND THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS.
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
These people taking selfies with cops didnt have the demeanor of an angry mob who was hunting down congressmen.

Plenty of video on it. All you have to do search. Here's a small snippet. You can hear the protesters in the background. Do they sound jovial? BTW, I can't tell if the woman at the end was a Congresswoman or a protester. I can't really make out her words.



That's some video, Jack, it shows nothing. When will it become the ABC Movie of the Week? Could have been acted out in Hollywood for all we can tell there. Kinda sucks that none of these people had guns to defend themselves, huh? Or the balls to do so. I mean, they were under "siege" by a small group of people with effectively no real weapons either and almost took over the Congress? And for what? For wanting representation from their representatives! :laughing0301:

Hope we're never attacked by a REAL enemy! :21:
 
How come there was no ramifications when the filthy Lesbos Feminazis stormed the Capitol building during the Kavanaugh hearings?

View attachment 440122

Or when the Commie assholes stormed the Wisconsin Capitol building?

View attachment 440124

Oh jeepers. Seditionists ALL!! Hey wait, none of them are carrying zip ties, or Confederate flags, or Don't Tread on Me Flags, or wearing Holocaust denier T-Shirts. They don't look like they are ransacking Congressional offices, or breaking windows, or trying to smash doors down to get to politicians. In fact, they don't look very angry at all.

So I guess we'll just chalk this up as the latest right wing comparison fallacy? OK? Cool. :)
Zip ties and flags arent illegal, fucktard. :laugh:
Gee, what do you think they were gonna do with those zipcuffs?
Exactly what they did do with them... nothing at all. Quit inventing shit that never happened.

The fact that they were carrying zip ties speaks to their intent when they stormed the Capitol.
They never once tried to use them.

That's because they never got a hold of any House or Senate member. If they had, I know they would have used them. They were speaking openly of it.
A group of them were chanting to "Get Pence"....you don't do that if your intentions aren't hostile.
These people taking selfies with cops didnt have the demeanor of an angry mob who was hunting down congressmen.

Plenty of video on it. All you have to do search. Here's a small snippet. You can hear the protesters in the background. Do they sound jovial? BTW, I can't tell if the woman at the end was a Congresswoman or a protester. I can't really make out her words.



That's some video, Jack, it shows nothing. When will it become the ABC Movie of the Week? Could have been acted out in Hollywood for all we can tell there. Kinda sucks that none of these people had guns to defend themselves, huh? Or the balls to do so. I mean, they were under "siege" by a small group of people with effectively no real weapons either and almost took over the Congress? And for what? For wanting representation from their representatives! :laughing0301:

Hope we're never attacked by a REAL enemy! :21:


There's more Freaky. Plus all that content on Twitter. Pull your head out of your keister and just own the fact that Trump supporters tried to execute a coup. All with your approval.
Representation. LOL. You mean coercion with the threat of violence....how very democratic of you. :)
 
There's more Freaky. Plus all that content on Twitter. Pull your head out of your keister and just own the fact that Trump supporters tried to execute a coup. All with your approval.


Jack, it is always so cute how you try to rebuttal with no facts to deny my points so you leave with your usual ad hominem irrelevancies. The highest purpose of our Constitution is that the ultimate power is with the PEOPLE to remove foreign or DOMESTIC, and when you have an illegal election and an illegal president, that isn't a coup, that is a CORRECTION.

Of course, the government could fix all this by simply allowing the full, complete and open examination of all of Trump's evidence of election malfeasance! I've been told 10,000 times it is all BASELESS so, you'd think the Left would WANT it all shot down in the public forum rather than swept under the rug.

That's what GUILTY people do when they are trying not to be EXPOSED.

But you poops won't do that so be prepared for civil riot and war as the new norm under the crushing autocracy of the Biden Regime.
 
The purpose of this thread is to analyze both the long and short-term ramifications of the 1/6 siege of the Capitol Building.


The only ramification of 1/6 is that every effort was made to settle the questions and evidence of the election peacefully within the system and they were all blocked, refused, ridiculed and denied, so now you've seen the first of what will undoubtedly be many increasingly stronger and more violent efforts OUTSIDE the system to remove that flabby illegal bum from the WH by peiople who simply refuse to live under a totalitarian socialist autocracy.

WELCOME TO THE BIDEN YEARS.

BROUGHT TO US BY NANCY AND THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS.

In other words, when they couldn't get the results they wanted within the system, they were happy to go outside the system and the law.
 
What's wrong with eliminating public access to the US Capitol building?

That's a workplace. You just can't stroll into a steel mill or a coal mine unless you have specific scheduled business. Why not for the capitol?

Although, IMHO, most Congressional sessions should be done "virtually" with the members in their districts.
Steel mills and coal mines are private property. The capitol is public property.

Rerasonable limits have always existed. Such as one cannot simply walk onto the senate or house floor while they aere in session. They have a public viewing gallery for that.

But the building still belongs to the taxpayers not the congress.
 
The purpose of this thread is to analyze both the long and short-term ramifications of the 1/6 siege of the Capitol Building.


The only ramification of 1/6 is that every effort was made to settle the questions and evidence of the election peacefully within the system and they were all blocked, refused, ridiculed and denied, so now you've seen the first of what will undoubtedly be many increasingly stronger and more violent efforts OUTSIDE the system to remove that flabby illegal bum from the WH by peiople who simply refuse to live under a totalitarian socialist autocracy.

WELCOME TO THE BIDEN YEARS.

BROUGHT TO US BY NANCY AND THE RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS.

In other words, when they couldn't get the results they wanted within the system, they were happy to go outside the system and the law.
This is the same thing the South did. That started a war. This won't do that (we most fervently hope and believe) and it probably won't be repeated. Just the same, this was a direct attack on the Constitution, as well as any dignity that can be ascribed to the Republic. Those having perpetrated this deserve maximum judicial punishment.
 
In other words, when they couldn't get the results they wanted within the system, they were happy to go outside the system and the law.



I never said that. Please learn to extrapolate correctly or withhold comment. I said they tried to get redress of their grievances with the government as the system is supposed to allow to have the clear proof of malfeasance plainly examined and tested for veracity and the corrupt system still under the same problems laid out in detail fifteen years ago by the Carter-Baker Commission on Election Reform, but were blocked by a legal system both unwanting to take responsibility and UNWILLING to do so because it had a clear objective of getting Trump out of office by all means possible.

Otherwise, the courts wouldn't have relied on thin technicalities and the government-media complex wouldn't have flatly denied the evidence had any merit without having even examined it.

The irregularities of Biden's election are simply mathematically and statistically IMPOSSIBLE. But if they ARE indeed so "baseless" as all the media told you then the democrats and courts should have tested and PROVEN it wrong and it would have saved this country all the mess this country now has and the far greater mess soon to follow.

Had the courts tested and PROVEN the election was indeed fair and all the evidence false, I'm certain that 99% of Trump's followers and those concerned for election integrity would have accepted it and moved on instead of what we have now.
 
In other words, when they couldn't get the results they wanted within the system, they were happy to go outside the system and the law.
Just the same, this was a direct attack on the Constitution, as well as any dignity that can be ascribed to the Republic.



Not really. What happened in Washington was merely a macro manifestation in the physical space what those people see being done to them by the government on the plane of rules and ideas and authority.

Unjust acts will always bring you an unjust response.

Had the Democrats not gone a MILE out of their way to rig the election in a way they HAD to know was going to be questioned, questionable and not sit well with millions in this country, then REFUSED to even allow the jilted candidate his day in court to plead his case, NONE OF THIS NEVER WOULD HAVE HAPPENED.

Call these people in the riot what you want but when you twist a cat's tail, sooner or later you will get scratched back in self-defense. I don't fault the cat.

Clearly, our elections are BROKEN and been that way increasingly for a LONG time and I now consider my vote MEANINGLESS AND WORTHLESS. DC will appoint who THEY want, not the public.
 
I hear that the China Joe transition team has the Marine band practicing playing The International for the inauguration.

 
Kneeling was criticized by those who now call invading Constitutional processes patriotic.
Kneeling may have been ridiculous, or showy, or anything else, but it wasn't sedition.
Just because foreign agents call anyone outraged by this attack on the Republic "left" doesn't make it so.
 
There's more Freaky. Plus all that content on Twitter. Pull your head out of your keister and just own the fact that Trump supporters tried to execute a coup. All with your approval.


Jack, it is always so cute how you try to rebuttal with no facts to deny my points so you leave with your usual ad hominem irrelevancies. The highest purpose of our Constitution is that the ultimate power is with the PEOPLE to remove foreign or DOMESTIC, and when you have an illegal election and an illegal president, that isn't a coup, that is a CORRECTION.

Of course, the government could fix all this by simply allowing the full, complete and open examination of all of Trump's evidence of election malfeasance! I've been told 10,000 times it is all BASELESS so, you'd think the Left would WANT it all shot down in the public forum rather than swept under the rug.

That's what GUILTY people do when they are trying not to be EXPOSED.

But you poops won't do that so be prepared for civil riot and war as the new norm under the crushing autocracy of the Biden Regime.

The election wasn't illegal. It wasn't stolen. It wasn't rigged. He lost. 65 lower court cases and 2 SC cases should have told you..NO EVIDENCE!!, and after Electoral certification you guys lost it, so a plot was hatched to overturn the election by staging an insurrection on a day when a Constitutional procedure was taking place in Congress. Anyone who was on the Capitol grounds that day is guilty of sedition and treason. End of story. The video coming out hour by hour is bone chilling. These people were intent on murder and re-installing Donald Trump as President. Sorry Freaky, you're full of it as usual. But, you can always try again. I don't think it will be warm and fuzzy the next time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top