Remember John Edwards?

What do you mean?

The principle is the same here.

Paying off these women was done to support the campaign. Therefore, the money is a campaign expense and needed to comply with campaign finance law.

This means contribution limits. It also means that it needs to be recorded on FEC forms.

In both circumstances, the government is saying that they were SUPPOSED to use campaign money, but didn't.
The intent was the same

But trump used his own money and edwards didnt
 
If I remember right in the nineties you loons told me that a man's sex life is no bodies business but his own. Were you lying? Clinton had sex in the oval office with a nineteen year old intern. Lol, the fake outrage of you loons.
How old are you? Are you so young you don't remember your own parties hypocricy on this?

You guys said first you were outraged because you are the family party. Then we found out all your guys were cheaters too. Then you guys said what mattered was that Clinton lied under oath.

Trump is smart. He pleads the 5th. And even Trump admits anyone who does that is guilty af.
 
He used business funds
That is why he is being prosecuted
He can be prosecuted for using business funds but they are not campaign funds. The laws are much more explicit and stringent on how campaign funds are used.
 
Except Edwards used campaign funds and didn't report it. Instead, he had a staffer claim HE was the father or Reille's baby. The Staffer was paid off, too.
The key here being that Edwards USED CAMPAIGN FUNDS NOT HIS OWN MONEY, which is the illegal part. All that other shit is irrelevant.
 
Juanita Broderick was a liar.

She filed two affidavits claiming she never had sex with Clinton. She continued to work on Clinton's political campaigns and events and accepted an appointment to a state board by Clinton. This is not what a rape victim does.

Most of the "other 11 women" have said the encounters were consensual. At least one (the one from England) isn't even a real person. Sure, Clinton associated with Epstein, but so did Trump.

He was an adulterer. So were Henry Hyde and Newt Gingrich, who still impeached him over the blow job without a single twinge of irony.
If you ever talk about anyone being in a cult again......
 
We won't go there, but you were good with Clinton the impeached adulterer back in the Whitehouse.
Of course we won’t

Because after over 20 years of trying to bring charges against Hillary, you failed to find even one
 
Of course we won’t

Because after over 20 years of trying to bring charges against Hillary, you failed to find even one

Jack-Smith-Second-Trump-Indictment-Memes-6-1024x648.webp
 
How old are you? Are you so young you don't remember your own parties hypocricy on this?

You guys said first you were outraged because you are the family party. Then we found out all your guys were cheaters too. Then you guys said what mattered was that Clinton lied under oath.

Trump is smart. He pleads the 5th. And even Trump admits anyone who does that is guilty af.
You're the one being the hypocrite now. You loons changed the rules about the ethics of our leaders in the nineties. So **** off and don't be outraged when you have to follow the guidelines you set. Oh and by the way noble one now, this is a list of Biden's accusers one had to move to Russia to get away from the death threats against her and the another one is his daughter. So don't try to act like you have any morals.

FB_IMG_1712808552867.webp

Before you say it, you loons shout all women should be heard. Except for these.
 
The intent was the same

But trump used his own money and edwards didnt
Doesn't matter whose money it was, neither were recorded as part of the campaign expenditures.
 
Well, then refute it with some validation. When, where, and how did Trump use campaign funds for hush money?
Trump didn't use campaign funds for the hush money but he was supposed to.

Same with Edwards.

Read the indictments, they explain it pretty clearly.
 
15th post
I would question the honesty of anyone that does not find the timing of these charges just a little too convenient.
If Trump wasn't president, these charges could have been filed years ago and should have.

This is a problem with holding that a sitting president can't be indicted.
 
You're the one being the hypocrite now. You loons changed the rules about the ethics of our leaders in the nineties. So **** off and don't be outraged when you have to follow the guidelines you set. Oh and by the way noble one now, this is a list of Biden's accusers one had to move to Russia to get away from the death threats against her and the another one is his daughter. So don't try to act like you have any morals.

His daughter has never said anything but effusive praise about him, and Tara Reade is a convicted perjurer.
 
Back
Top Bottom