Racist, Marxist NYC Housing Czar says WHITE middle-class homeowners are huge problem

Really?

You are as bad as the dems are in injecting Trump into every thread.

BTW....Wouldn't that be Jewish homeowners?
In her defense, the dimocrap scum party and its communist adherents are extremely antisemitic. And it's showing up more each day.

I am against any racial, ethnic or religious broad form of hate or derision. Except in the case of dimocrap FILTH. They are truly the scum of the Earth
 
It's tells me they are magnificently stupid, stunningly dumb, ridiculously ignorant and quite possibly all drug addicts.
….or, a big segment of immigrants from countries with values that are antithetical to America’s. There are 750,000 Arabs in NYC alone.
 
….or, a big segment of immigrants from countries with values that are antithetical to America’s. There are 750,000 Arabs in NYC alone.
New York City used to a melting pot of cultures that somehow blended into an American culture.
Now it's just a pot that's melted.

i-mKjt39F-M.jpg
 
….or, a big segment of immigrants from countries with values that are antithetical to America’s. There are 750,000 Arabs in NYC alone.
Tradition.

"My Daddy was a democrat, so was his daddy, and his daddy before him. So are all my Aunts and Uncles"

To many, being a dimocrap is like being a member of a Religion. Stupid people. Ignorant people. Naive, uninformed people. Childish people, people afraid of change, people afraid of bullies, the dark and closets.

Many of them know who and what they're voting for and they do it anyway. Out of honoring some tradition.

It's stupid and I have no sympathy for them. At all. They got what they deserve.

In Spades
 
You are uninformed.


The Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the Municipal Housing Authorities Law, affirming the use of eminent domain by the New York City Housing Authority to condemn properties for the clearance, replanning, and reconstruction of slum areas. The court recognized the severe public health, safety, and economic issues stemming from the existence of slums, deeming the legislative findings and public use determination as sufficient to validate the exercise of eminent domain. The majority opinion emphasized the government's duty to protect public welfare and acknowledged the lack of successful private enterprise solutions in combating the entrenched slum conditions. Consequently, the court affirmed the lower court's decision, allowing the condemnation to proceed.
You are equating middle class white neighborhoods with slums? Wow.
 
They would argue that the government shouldn't need to. But you can't deny, economic efficiency is one of their goals. Put another way, the elimination of the mis-allocation of resources.

I can give you a very specific example. There was a huge tract of land, right across the county line, which was the river. For decades, it was undeveloped. Major thoroughfare, prime commercial property. Much of it lake front property. The reason, owned by a kid, inherited, don't know if it was ignorance of the parents, or genius. Well, now, once he turned 18 and could legally let it go, it is a thriving commercial complex. But that was like 15 years stalled, why? And who does that help.

Which libertarians have ever said economic efficiency should give the government the power to seize private property?
 
Back
Top Bottom