Racist, Marxist NYC Housing Czar says WHITE middle-class homeowners are huge problem

[Blaster]

I thought the rich were the problem and not the middle class.

 

[BluesLegend]

Turning NY real estate into public housing, what could possibly go wrong??

I find it absolutely hilarious to watch the radical left turn on the very people who gave them power.

 

[BluesLegend]

I thought the rich were the problem and not the middle class.

To a leftist loser the 'rich' is anyone who has more than they do. They WILL vampire suck the middle class dry.

 

[Winston]

She specifically said WHITES are the problem.

And aren’t you the lib who bragged about getting an MBA and hen refusing to work so you could get all six of your children on welfare? What a lowlife you are.

You keep clutching that pearl, water off a duck's back. But, since you are so interested in my personal life. And since this thread is really about "land", or private property.

It is 1748, in what is now western North Carolina, after the continental divide. John McDowell and Henry Weidner were on a hunting expedition. As they start down the western slope they come to a view of a lush virgin forest, stretching thousands of acres. "Dibs"--seriously, that is how it went down. So, they had a wrestling match, McDowell won. See, McDowell had a land grant, that wrestling match resulted in the splitting of that land between the two men.

So, anyways, I am a descendant of Weidner, his youngest daughter, through my mother. Weidner had been hunting those grounds for two decades prior. But my heritage is no big deal, thousands of people around here descended from Weidner. The thing is the land, passed down generation after generation. Is it being used most efficiently? That is a responsibility, fall down on that don't be surprised when the state comes calling.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Get a damn grip. If you are white, black, purple, live in your home, you are fine. But, if you are white, black, purple, and own a rental property, like a home, charge exorbitant rent, can't do even routine maintenance, then yeah, you might want to get worried. The state has a responsibility, to insure that every property is utilized to the most economically efficient enterprise.

I hate to tell you. But it works that way throughout the nation. Say you got a couple thousand acres in Eastern North Carolina. Maybe you lease it out to a hunting club. Not that uncommon. But when a data center decides your property is a good location, and you refuse their offer to purchase, maybe you are an environmentalist, don't be surprised when they lobby the state and you are faced with an imminent domain summons. It happens. Then you get what they give you.

The state has a responsibility, to insure that every property is utilized to the most economically efficient enterprise.

They do?

 

[Winston]

The state has a responsibility, to insure that every property is utilized to the most economically efficient enterprise.

They do?

Sure, and would not libertarian principals yield that result, in a perfect world, in a true "free" market?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Sure, and would not libertarian principals yield that result, in a perfect world, in a true "free" market?

Libertarians wouldn't agree the government has a responsibility to seize private property for
"economic efficiency".

 

[Winston]

Libertarians wouldn't agree the government has a responsibility to seize private property for
"economic efficiency".

They would argue that the government shouldn't need to. But you can't deny, economic efficiency is one of their goals. Put another way, the elimination of the mis-allocation of resources.

I can give you a very specific example. There was a huge tract of land, right across the county line, which was the river. For decades, it was undeveloped. Major thoroughfare, prime commercial property. Much of it lake front property. The reason, owned by a kid, inherited, don't know if it was ignorance of the parents, or genius. Well, now, once he turned 18 and could legally let it go, it is a thriving commercial complex. But that was like 15 years stalled, why? And who does that help.

 

[Lisa558]

Really?

You are as bad as the dems are in injecting Trump into every thread.

BTW....Wouldn't that be Jewish homeowners?

You miss the subtlety of why I said Jew.

 

[PeanutGallery]

They would argue that the government shouldn't need to. But you can't deny, economic efficiency is one of their goals. Put another way, the elimination of the mis-allocation of resources.

I can give you a very specific example. There was a huge tract of land, right across the county line, which was the river. For decades, it was undeveloped. Major thoroughfare, prime commercial property. Much of it lake front property. The reason, owned by a kid, inherited, don't know if it was ignorance of the parents, or genius. Well, now, once he turned 18 and could legally let it go, it is a thriving commercial complex. But that was like 15 years stalled, why? And who does that help.

Are you arguing from a position that because it was bequeathed to a kid, the government should've taken that property from them sooner? Very easy for people to make that argument when it's not their property being discussed.

 

[Lisa558]

Get a damn grip. If you are white, black, purple, live in your home, you are fine. But, if you are white, black, purple, and own a rental property, like a home, charge exorbitant rent, can't do even routine maintenance, then yeah, you might want to get worried. The state has a responsibility, to insure that every property is utilized to the most economically efficient enterprise.

But she didn’t sat white, black, or purple, now did she? She specifically said WHITE HOMEOWNERS.

And who decides what is exorbitant rent? If people are willing to pay it, then the market has decided it’s OK. If nobody is willing to pay it, then the market has decided it’s too much.

I hate to tell you. But it works that way throughout the nation. Say you got a couple thousand acres in Eastern North Carolina. Maybe you lease it out to a hunting club. Not that uncommon. But when a data center decides your property is a good location, and you refuse their offer to purchase, maybe you are an environmentalist, don't be surprised when they lobby the state and you are faced with an imminent domain summons. It happens. Then you get what they give you.

According to the racist Housing Czar, if you’re white you take what they give you.

 

[Lisa558]

I thought the rich were the problem and not the middle class.

She might have realized what all Marxists eventually do. There aren’t enough rich people from whom to take money, so you have to drop down to the middle-class to take.

The problem is that the middle class and the “receivers” come close to being equivalent, and any motivation to better oneself is smacked right out of you.

 

[Lockback]

Two goals/beliefs have come out of the mouth of Mondami’s housing czar:

1) She is a racist, targeting white homeowners for her derision. (Are there no black homeowners ?)

2) She is a Marxist, who admitted her goal of rent control “is the first step toward full social control of housing.”

Will she institute a special “white tax” on homeowners?

(On the plus side, at least she didn’t say the Jew homeowners are the problem.)

New Videos Show Mamdani Housing Czar’s True Socialist Agenda

Zohran Mamdani’s housing czar is in the news again for more unearthed videos where she called for the tanking of housing markets.

www.dailysignal.com

I mean, what could possibly go wrong with a racist Communist in charge?

 

[Lisa558]

I mean, what could possibly go wrong with a racist Communist in charge?

IKR?

 

[Thinker101]

I thought the rich were the problem and not the middle class.

It's all relative. If you've got $50 and the guy down the street has $1, you are the rich one. And we wonder why they use such vague terms.

 

[Edgetho]

Two goals/beliefs have come out of the mouth of Mondami’s housing czar:

1) She is a racist, targeting white homeowners for her derision. (Are there no black homeowners ?)

2) She is a Marxist, who admitted her goal of rent control “is the first step toward full social control of housing.”

Will she institute a special “white tax” on homeowners?

(On the plus side, at least she didn’t say the Jew homeowners are the problem.)

New Videos Show Mamdani Housing Czar’s True Socialist Agenda

Zohran Mamdani’s housing czar is in the news again for more unearthed videos where she called for the tanking of housing markets.

www.dailysignal.com

Who voted him into Office?

It wasn't Floridians. Or Texans.

IOW, you get the government you deserve.

1/3 of Jews voted for him. What does that tell you about the mentality of dimocrap scum?

 

[Lisa558]

It's all relative. If you've got $50 and the guy down the street has $1, you are the rich one. And we wonder why they use such vague terms.

And if you’re a welfare leech, then the guy who has a job is rich.

 

[Thinker101]

And if you’re a welfare leech, then the guy who has a job is rich.

And if you're a welfare leach and a fraud, everyone else is a racist.

 

[Lisa558]

Who voted him into Office?

It wasn't Floridians. Or Texans.

IOW, you get the government you deserve.

1/3 of Jews voted for him. What does that tell you about the mentality of dimocrap scum?

As far as Jews, it tells me what I’ve said repeatedly: for the radical left segment of Jews (approximately 1/3), their love of leftism overcomes any concern for antisemitism. Thus, they will - as we’ve seen - vote for a raging antisemite as long as he promises to bring in socialism.

 

[Lockback]

Who voted him into Office?

It wasn't Floridians. Or Texans.

IOW, you get the government you deserve.

1/3 of Jews voted for him. What does that tell you about the mentality of dimocrap scum?

It's tells me they are magnificently stupid, stunningly dumb, ridiculously ignorant and quite possibly all drug addicts.