Racheal Maddow

Tom Clancy

Clancy for Ron Paul
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
3,222
Reaction score
616
Points
48
Location
North Carolina.
Racheal is the best informed, most comprehensive and smartest broadcast personality on TV.
See now, this is the point where I can't stand Liberals..

They complain and complain about how Glenn Beck and Hannity are the worst people ever but then come around out of nowhere saying Maddow and Olbermann are the most informed anchors around..

Hypocrites..
 
OP
Wry Catcher

Wry Catcher

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
51,323
Reaction score
6,454
Points
1,860
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Ah yes, the willfully ignorant speak, all with one voice. Almost as if they echo each other. Independent thinkers, I think not.
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,491
Reaction score
4,133
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185

HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152



C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............


Nobody watches that show!!!!!


:lol::lol::lol:
 

maineman

Rookie
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
13,003
Reaction score
572
Points
0
Location
guess
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185

HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152



C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............


Nobody watches that show!!!!!


:lol::lol::lol:
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
 

Angelhair

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
2,597
Reaction score
152
Points
48
Two words - ugly, sarcastic.......can't stand that 'woman'.
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,491
Reaction score
4,133
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185

HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152



C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............


Nobody watches that show!!!!!


:lol::lol::lol:
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?




and irrelevant post................:eusa_whistle:
 

Misty

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
7,137
Reaction score
1,923
Points
245
First of all it's Rachel Not racheal.

Try spelling her name correctly before you praise her.

She has a research team that finds all her info for her

she then reads off a Teleprompter.

As they all do.
 
Last edited:

Mad Scientist

Feels Good!
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
24,196
Reaction score
5,420
Points
270
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
Yes. That guy, Rachel Madnow, though well educated, has no clue how to get people, liberal or conservative to watch her show. Buy hey, MSNBC has no clue how to get people to watch their entire network either.

Her only defense would be that someone else is pulling the strings on her show. Maybe she could flash her tits or something.
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,491
Reaction score
4,133
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
Yes. That guy, Rachel Madnow, though well educated, has no clue how to get people, liberal or conservative to watch her show. Buy hey, MSNBC has no clue how to get people to watch their entire network either.

Her only defense would be that someone else is pulling the strings on her show. Maybe she could flash her tits or something.


YIKES..............no thanks. Her face is hideous enough!!:lol: But I suspect that if she did, you'd know why shes such an uber-feminist!!
 

del

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
52,099
Reaction score
10,832
Points
2,030
Location
on a one way cul-de-sac
i watch her occasionally. she's very bright, although calling her the best informed really isn't saying much. she's honest within the context of her biases, but sometimes comes across to me as smarmy. she's certainly lightyears better than olbermann, matthews, and oreilly. i've never watched beck except on clips here, posted by his supporters. as far as i can tell, he's an even bigger asshat than the rest of them.
 

bodecea

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
138,516
Reaction score
16,208
Points
2,180
Location
#HasNoClothes
The Scoreboard: Thursday, May 27
By Chris Ariens on May 28, 2010 04:45 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)

Total day: FNC: 395 | CNN: 211 | MSNBC: 138 | HLN: 129

Prime: FNC: 700 | CNN: 246 | MSNBC: 239 | HLN: 225
5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p:

FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:
503 343 428 873 629 596 531

CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: KingUSA: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:
283 280 221 237 222 280 246

MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:
142 131 163 296 217 203 185

HLN Showbiz: Prime: Issues: Grace: Behar: Grace: Showbiz:
48 50 164 341 127 226 152



C'mon..........this is a joke right??? Look at the Maddow # ( highlighted in red)........and this is in the 25-54 demographic, so total rating is even going to be lower. The show barely has 1 million viewers/night and many nights falls under that and it is estimated that a vast majority of those viewers are committed liberal viewers. So........in other words..............


Nobody watches that show!!!!!


:lol::lol::lol:
and do you honestly believe that ratings have any sort of direct correlation with the intelligence of the host?
Usually, it's an inverse correlation.
 
OP
Wry Catcher

Wry Catcher

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
51,323
Reaction score
6,454
Points
1,860
Location
San Francisco Bay Area
Obviously the willfully ignorant have not and will not watch anything which might cause them discomfort - avoiding cognitive dissonance seems to be a common factor in their belief system, and why they hold so firmly to the talking points of the right.
 

WillowTree

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
84,341
Reaction score
15,793
Points
2,180
i watch her occasionally. she's very bright, although calling her the best informed really isn't saying much. she's honest within the context of her biases, but sometimes comes across to me as smarmy. she's certainly lightyears better than olbermann, matthews, and oreilly. i've never watched beck except on clips here, posted by his supporters. as far as i can tell, he's an even bigger asshat than the rest of them.
I don't know so much about Beck. He can only be tolerated by me in small doses. You are very wrong about O'Reilly. He actually puts his money where is mouth is. You know he was instrumental in getting OJ's stupid book "Why I Did it" shit canned. You know he was instrumental in getting Jessica's law passed don't you. He doesn't just sit there and bitch and talk. He actively works to improve this country. You do know that he has a site that sells merchandise? Every penny goes to charity. You do know he has a wounded warrior program. Raises thousands upon thousands of dollars for our wounded vets. And last but not least.. he took on Bawney Fwank and called him out for the dirty scoundrel he is and was in re to Fannie and Freddie.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top