Question for the legal eagles on here......

[Mac1958]

Great thread!

 

[Mac-7]

until Trump came along.

There are arguments to be made for and against unleashed presidents

But trump was always limited in some ways and never completely free to do whatever he wanted to

however the topic is about biden (sorry Mac1958, we’ll get back to trump for you as soon as possible)

and I dont think biden’s mentally or physically capable of bring his own man

so I wonder who is pulling his strings

 

[Dragonlady]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

WHAT IS YOUR LEGAL EVIDENCE THAT SAID CANDIDATE IS INCOMPETENT? YOU CAN'T MAKE FALLACIOUS CLAIMS AND THEN EXPECT A RESPONSE. YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF HIS INCOMPETENCE, AND THERE IS NONE. THERE'S MORE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S MENTAL INCOMPETENCE THAN BIDEN'S?

IN ADDITION, HOW DID THIS COMPARE WITH PUTTING REAGAN IN THE PRESIDENCY WITH ALZHEIMERS? DID YOU QUESTION THAT? WE HAVE SOME PRETTY GOOD EVIDENCE HE HAD SYMPTOMS WHILE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

Was it legal for the Republican Party to select a candidate for the Presidency who was a known grifter, who had driven 7 companies into bankruptcy, and was being sued for fraud in excess of $100 million, while promising the American people that they would control his "worst inclinations" while in office, and then enabled those worst impulses for 4 years, killing 550,000 Americans, and crashing the economy?

Donald Trump was sold to the American people as this great successful billionaire, overseeing one of the greatest business empires in America, and no one of these things were true.

Do Republicans not have any sort of fiduciary duty to the country to ensure that their candidate isn't a dishonest conman out to fleece the American public? The aptly named "Stop the Steal" campaign has had to return more than $122 million dollars of fraud claims to its donors.

 

[my2¢]

It doesn't take any sort of legal eagle to answer this one....

​

Just as the Republicans had similar right to their delusional nominee.

 

[Crepitus]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

Oh look! It's a whack-job conspiracy theory hiding under a misleading title.

In other words, a crack-pot telling a lie.

 

[Crepitus]

Your allegation is weak and you have left out the most important aspect, evidence.

https://www.sierrastar.com/opinion/columns-blogs/dr-bill-atwood/article249904578.html

'Is he really in charge?': Cornyn tweet about Biden draws scorn, White House response

Critics leapt at the tweet, which garnered hundreds of retweets, likes and replies by Monday afternoon and a response from the White House.

www.statesman.com

Charlie Kirk: Joe Biden Isn’t in Charge. Who Is?

The Biden press conference generated obvious concerns and one big question.

humanevents.com

A blogger is now proof? Logic demands fact not opinion.

Not if you're a republican. If they waited for facts that supported their allegations they'd never get anything done.

 

[Crepitus]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

YES. Every pres has advisors who help him with decision making.

Are you saying a cognitively impaired brain surgery survivor is actually making decisions? Lord help us.

The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

SECTION. 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

constitutioncenter.org

No, tRump got voted out. And his lobotomy was decades ago anyway.

 

[OKTexas]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

He met the qualifications in the Constitution, was nominated and got the necessary EC votes. So yes, it's legal. What ya gonna do, sue him for fraud?

.

I think invoking the 25th amendment would be the appropriate thing to do.

Yeah, that ain't gonna happen either.

.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

YES. Every pres has advisors who help him with decision making.

Are you saying a cognitively impaired brain surgery survivor is actually making decisions? Lord help us.

The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

SECTION. 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

constitutioncenter.org

No, tRump got voted out. And his lobotomy was decades ago anyway.

Negroes should be seen and not heard......I keep one on my front lawn. hehheh

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.

Legal? Yes.

Deceptive? Yes.

Worthy of execution, because fuck deceptive authoritarian kuuunts? Yes

Fuck Mac1958? Yes.