Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
While I agree with you, Biden isn't the first puppet in the oval office.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
Your allegation is weak and you have left out the most important aspect, evidence.
humanevents.com
A blogger is now proof? Logic demands fact not opinion.Your allegation is weak and you have left out the most important aspect, evidence.
'Is he really in charge?': Cornyn tweet about Biden draws scorn, White House response
Critics leapt at the tweet, which garnered hundreds of retweets, likes and replies by Monday afternoon and a response from the White House.www.statesman.com
Charlie Kirk: Joe Biden Isn’t in Charge. Who Is?
The Biden press conference generated obvious concerns and one big question.
Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
YES. Every pres has advisors who help him with decision making.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
YES. Every pres has advisors who help him with decision making.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
its rare when you find a democrat that cares about facts...nice dudeA blogger is now proof? Logic demands fact not opinion.Your allegation is weak and you have left out the most important aspect, evidence.
'Is he really in charge?': Cornyn tweet about Biden draws scorn, White House response
Critics leapt at the tweet, which garnered hundreds of retweets, likes and replies by Monday afternoon and a response from the White House.www.statesman.com
Charlie Kirk: Joe Biden Isn’t in Charge. Who Is?
The Biden press conference generated obvious concerns and one big question.
Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
A blogger is now proof? Logic demands fact not opinion.Your allegation is weak and you have left out the most important aspect, evidence.
'Is he really in charge?': Cornyn tweet about Biden draws scorn, White House response
Critics leapt at the tweet, which garnered hundreds of retweets, likes and replies by Monday afternoon and a response from the White House.www.statesman.com
Charlie Kirk: Joe Biden Isn’t in Charge. Who Is?
The Biden press conference generated obvious concerns and one big question.
www.vox.com
Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
He met the qualifications in the Constitution, was nominated and got the necessary EC votes. So yes, it's legal. What ya gonna do, sue him for fraud?
.
Legal!?! Dude. They stole the election.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
But we do know who's technically ruining er running our country....Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
Until now those decisions weren’t more pudding or nappy time.YES. Every pres has advisors who help him with decision making.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
The problem with that is the shadow government always runs the country, no matter who is potus.Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
Was it legal for the democratic party to select a candidate for the Presidency who they knew would not really be in charge....in other words just a figure head.....whilst those really in charge stay in the shadows....thus we do not know who is really running the country now.
He met the qualifications in the Constitution, was nominated and got the necessary EC votes. So yes, it's legal. What ya gonna do, sue him for fraud?
.
I think invoking the 25th amendment would be the appropriate thing to do.
GW Bush was a decisive leader. When 9/11 happened, he was on the scene in New York the next day assuring Americans that he would strike back and hamper the terrorists and he did just that. I don't give a hoot about pretty speeches. I want a man of action as President."W" wasn't much different. Neither should have ever been President.
His decision was to let Cheney have his way.GW Bush was a decisive leader. When 9/11 happened, he was on the scene in New York the next day assuring Americans that he would strike back and hamper the terrorists and he did just that. I don't give a hoot about pretty speeches. I want a man of action as President."W" wasn't much different. Neither should have ever been President.
