- Banned
- #961
Your opinion and $0.99 will buy you a double cheeseburger at McD.
given Bush's shitty approval ratings, it would seem that the doctor's worthless opinion of Bush is held by many many Americans!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your opinion and $0.99 will buy you a double cheeseburger at McD.
I know how your govt works. You have three branches - executive, legislative and judicial.
Of course Bush can cherrypick and decide what congress sees. Thing is, you wouldn't know. Nobody would know. As for Bill, he had no doubt huh? Is that why he invaded Iraq? Oh, that's right, he didn't....
No, he invaded Kosovo.....and we are still there, too.
Your opinion and $0.99 will buy you a double cheeseburger at McD.
Your Ignorance of our Govrnment is telling, and yet you wnt to argue with us about things you can not even bother learning about.
Congress is NOT controlled by the President. It is Independent and operates INDEPENDENTLY. The President has NO authority to prevent them from doing their jobs, he can not preven them from getting independent briefs and independent opinions from ANY and ALL sources. He can not tell them what intel reports that can and can not read or ask for. He can not order the FBI, CIA or any other intel gathering department to not deliver information to Congress nor can he dictate what information they will provide.
Claiming he can is just proof of your ignorance of our Government and how it functions. Whats worse though is you get these ideas from Americans that KNOW better. Or should.
I know all that, but there is politics and there is politics....he has knowledge that some others don't. I remember way back near the beginning of his presidency there was some sort of investigation into power company monopolisation (I THINK it was power companies, I could be wrong). The inquiry was closed, lead by Cheney (from memory) and info was given by the power companies themselves AND the findings were never published.
He didn't invade anywhere. Nato was already there. And how contentious an issue is Kosovo compared to Iraq. You do all things are not the same, right?
Uhhhh.....for the CLUELESS, for all practical purposes...we ARE NATO. We constitute over 75% of it's combat power and are BY FAR it's main funder. The Balkans was almost 100% an American combat effort. Bill Clinton committed 20,000 ground troops to the Balkans in 1995 and 1996 with the PROMISE that they'd return home in less than one year....ALL 20,000 are STILL THERE.
And NO Iraq is NO LESS "contentious" than the Balkans were. The only difference is left wing loons, like you, are blinded by their hatred of ANYTHING Bush does or has ever done.
And no, I am NOT a Bush fan at all. Bush bungled what should have been a fairly straight forward operation in Iraq. Clinton laid the ground work for 9/11 to happen by mostly ignoring Islamic terrorism. At least he did the right thing in the Balkans, since the Euroweenies can't handle even insignificantly TINY aggressions....they tend to piss on themselves any time they are threatened.
I love when you retards claim we are blindly following. What we are doing,as we did under Clinton is acknowledging Bush is President. Admit it you Liberals just want to accuse Bush cause your hero got impeached for lying to a Judge under Oath. You can't let it go.And NO Iraq is NO LESS "contentious" than the Balkans were.
LOL!
If bill clinton had squandered a trillion dollars in the balkans, killed or wounded 30,000 american soldiers, and bungled us into a civil war there, I guarantee you that liberals would be among the first to say we needed to get out of that sh*t.
Now that the table are turned however, and Bush has bungled us into a costly disaster in iraq, republicans are sticking by their hero and blindly taking orders from him.
And NO Iraq is NO LESS "contentious" than the Balkans were.
LOL!
If bill clinton had squandered a trillion dollars in the balkans, killed or wounded 30,000 american soldiers, and bungled us into a civil war there, I guarantee you that liberals would be among the first to say we needed to get out of that sh*t.
Now that the table are turned however, and Bush has bungled us into a costly disaster in iraq, republicans are sticking by their hero and blindly taking orders from him.
Uhhhh.....for the CLUELESS, for all practical purposes...we ARE NATO. We constitute over 75% of it's combat power and are BY FAR it's main funder. The Balkans was almost 100% an American combat effort. Bill Clinton committed 20,000 ground troops to the Balkans in 1995 and 1996 with the PROMISE that they'd return home in less than one year....ALL 20,000 are STILL THERE.
And NO Iraq is NO LESS "contentious" than the Balkans were. The only difference is left wing loons, like you, are blinded by their hatred of ANYTHING Bush does or has ever done.
And no, I am NOT a Bush fan at all. Bush bungled what should have been a fairly straight forward operation in Iraq. Clinton laid the ground work for 9/11 to happen by mostly ignoring Islamic terrorism. At least he did the right thing in the Balkans, since the Euroweenies can't handle even insignificantly TINY aggressions....they tend to piss on themselves any time they are threatened.
We are in an on-going civil war in the Balkans. It is only our presence that keeps the murderous factions in the Balkans apart. You have no clue, obviously. Just because the left-wing dominated world media chooses not to cover it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I'm not sure what "orders" they are taking....
It is not just the US involved. Typical right-wing loon patriot crapola... There is no on-going civil war at all. There are the odd run-ins happening, but nothing more that is happening in other parts of the world. There is no wholesale war going on. Where do you get this crap? Your cheerios packet?
Reading for comprehension is not a strong suit of yours...obviously.
So, it IS OK to lie about going to war -- so long ad you dont kill 'too many' people, spend 'too much' money and have a (D) next to your name.If bill clinton had squandered a trillion dollars in the balkans, killed or wounded 30,000 american soldiers, and bungled us into a civil war there, I guarantee you that liberals would be among the first to say we needed to get out of that sh*t.
So, it IS OK to lie about going to war -- so long ad you dont kill 'too many' people, spend 'too much' money and have a (D) next to your name.
Good to see you can admit it.
Is anyone willing to say that Bush should have at least inspected the hospitals before he had us go to war? Can you say that there is anything that you think would be obvious that Bush should have done differently? (Im not talking about hindsight being 20/20. Im talking about foresight that would make you think that Bush jumped into war too quickly.) Would anyone say something along these lines, Wow? You screwed up here. Didnt it ever dawn on you that this action would be more appropriate? - or do all pro-Bush and Pro-Iraq people think that all of Bushs decisions throughout the war in Iraq to this point were reasonable and well-planned-out.