'PURGE' Rolls On: Dem Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal”, in Q-Anon from Holding Sec Clearance or Joining Military

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
68,567
Reaction score
27,526
Points
2,330

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.


This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."

NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.


The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."

Yeah, uh huh......


 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
88,173
Reaction score
7,857
Points
1,845
Location
Michigan

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


The Germans had a similar law after the beer hall putsch. They should have stuck to it because 9 years later hitler took over.
 

Dr Grump

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
30,047
Reaction score
5,661
Points
1,130
Location
From the Back of Beyond
Certainly agree with the Qnon mob. As for the stop the steal, well, that depends on their alleged activities. Were they there for the protest (a lot were and did nothing else, therefore should be okay) or did they invade Congress? In which case she is on the money.
 

NoNukes

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
14,115
Reaction score
1,939
Points
255
Location
At the computer

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


You would not want traitors in the military.
 

bripat9643

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
136,515
Reaction score
27,955
Points
2,180

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


You would not want traitors in the military.
You mean we should ban the minions of the Democrat Reich?
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
158,015
Reaction score
22,061
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
'PURGE' Rolls On: Dem Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal”, in Q-Anon from Holding Sec Clearance or Joining Military

and you don't get to smoke weed neither.
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,218
Reaction score
9,911
Points
900
Location
Western Lands

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


Is she a Chinese asset like Swalwell?
She don't look Irish to me.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
119,138
Reaction score
33,561
Points
2,220

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


Moderately Stalinist
 

Agit8r

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2010
Messages
12,141
Reaction score
2,191
Points
245
I mean, they've always theoretically screened for mental illness
 

night_son

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
8,281
Reaction score
7,524
Points
2,095
Location
The Full Moon

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


I retired from the US Army a year ago. When I joined up under the Delayed Entry Program in 1988 I was vetted to a degree, but I recall no questions about my political leanings—but how many fifteen year old kids really possess set in stone ideological beliefs? I was vetted again around 1992 when I was permanently attached to the 312th Military Intelligence Battalion and put on a long range surveillance detachment. Again, no questions were asked about which American political party I affiliated with, although there were questions about whether or not I was a communist or had been associated with the American communist party. Seems Russian agents had been caught trying to get their hands on phone books for the Army base where I was serving.

Over the course of the following two decades I would be vetted for various security clearances a number of times, most memorably after the events of 9/11/01. However, I cannot remember a single US Army background investigation which wanted to know my American political party affiliation, although I did receive a letter once from the Pentagon written entirely in Arabic, which turned out to be a test of sorts, to verify whether or not I could read and understand that language enough to respond, which I could and I did.

I can also report the same thing about background vetting for federal law enforcement. Yes, they did go door to door through neighborhoods where I had grown up asking questions about me and my family and they did indeed speak at length with a number of my public school teachers and college professors, but they never wanted to know whether I was a democrat or republican. That particular initial background investigation occurred around 2005, so social media popularity was well in force by that time. No background investigator ever asked for explanation of my ideological beliefs or means to see what I might have been writing about online, although they did check my Facebook and Gmail accounts for security risks—to see if criminal or foreign elements had infiltrated either account.

What we're witnessing here in 2021 is unprecedented and clear discrimination against law enforcement and military service applicants—and even already serving members of both—based on their political beliefs, racial appearance, and religious backgrounds. As a veteran of both the military and law enforcement I find it to be utterly sickening. The only reason for it, as others have said, is to identify and purge from service any applicant or active duty member whose political beliefs clash with modern Democratic Party ideology—and it needs to STOP or be stopped. Now.
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,218
Reaction score
9,911
Points
900
Location
Western Lands

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


I retired from the US Army a year ago. When I joined up under the Delayed Entry Program in 1988 I was vetted to a degree, but I recall no questions about my political leanings—but how many fifteen year old kids really possess set in stone ideological beliefs? I was vetted again around 1992 when I was permanently attached to the 312th Military Intelligence Battalion and put on a long range surveillance detachment. Again, no questions were asked about which American political party I affiliated with, although there were questions about whether or not I was a communist or had been associated with the American communist party. Seems Russian agents had been caught trying to get their hands on phone books for the Army base where I was serving.

Over the course of the following two decades I would be vetted for various security clearances a number of times, most memorably after the events of 9/11/01. However, I cannot remember a single US Army background investigation which wanted to know my American political party affiliation, although I did receive a letter once from the Pentagon written entirely in Arabic, which turned out to be a test of sorts, to verify whether or not I could read and understand that language enough to respond, which I could and I did.

I can also report the same thing about background vetting for federal law enforcement. Yes, they did go door to door through neighborhoods where I had grown up asking questions about me and my family and they did indeed speak at length with a number of my public school teachers and college professors, but they never wanted to know whether I was a democrat or republican. That particular initial background investigation occurred around 2005, so social media popularity was well in force by that time. No background investigator ever asked for explanation of my ideological beliefs or means to see what I might have been writing about online, although they did check my Facebook and Gmail accounts for security risks—to see if criminal or foreign elements had infiltrated either account.

What we're witnessing here in 2021 is unprecedented and clear discrimination against law enforcement and military service applicants—and even already serving members of both—based on their political beliefs, racial appearance, and religious backgrounds. As a veteran of both the military and law enforcement I find it to be utterly sickening. The only reason for it, as others have said, is to identify and purge from service any applicant or active duty member whose political beliefs clash with modern Democratic Party ideology—and it needs to STOP or be stopped. Now.
Is it even legal to ask what one's political preference is between the 2 main systemic party's?
 

night_son

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
8,281
Reaction score
7,524
Points
2,095
Location
The Full Moon

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


I retired from the US Army a year ago. When I joined up under the Delayed Entry Program in 1988 I was vetted to a degree, but I recall no questions about my political leanings—but how many fifteen year old kids really possess set in stone ideological beliefs? I was vetted again around 1992 when I was permanently attached to the 312th Military Intelligence Battalion and put on a long range surveillance detachment. Again, no questions were asked about which American political party I affiliated with, although there were questions about whether or not I was a communist or had been associated with the American communist party. Seems Russian agents had been caught trying to get their hands on phone books for the Army base where I was serving.

Over the course of the following two decades I would be vetted for various security clearances a number of times, most memorably after the events of 9/11/01. However, I cannot remember a single US Army background investigation which wanted to know my American political party affiliation, although I did receive a letter once from the Pentagon written entirely in Arabic, which turned out to be a test of sorts, to verify whether or not I could read and understand that language enough to respond, which I could and I did.

I can also report the same thing about background vetting for federal law enforcement. Yes, they did go door to door through neighborhoods where I had grown up asking questions about me and my family and they did indeed speak at length with a number of my public school teachers and college professors, but they never wanted to know whether I was a democrat or republican. That particular initial background investigation occurred around 2005, so social media popularity was well in force by that time. No background investigator ever asked for explanation of my ideological beliefs or means to see what I might have been writing about online, although they did check my Facebook and Gmail accounts for security risks—to see if criminal or foreign elements had infiltrated either account.

What we're witnessing here in 2021 is unprecedented and clear discrimination against law enforcement and military service applicants—and even already serving members of both—based on their political beliefs, racial appearance, and religious backgrounds. As a veteran of both the military and law enforcement I find it to be utterly sickening. The only reason for it, as others have said, is to identify and purge from service any applicant or active duty member whose political beliefs clash with modern Democratic Party ideology—and it needs to STOP or be stopped. Now.
Is it even legal to ask what one's political preference is between the 2 main systemic party's?

The modern Democratic Party seems to have its own ideas about the importance of what is and is not technically legal. I do not believe, in the democrats' eyes, that "legal" applies the same to all Americans.
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,218
Reaction score
9,911
Points
900
Location
Western Lands
I mean which Party do they throw an individual in who states that they vote on issues irrespective of Party?
And does any Gov't agency have the right to force an individual to reveal their stance on ISSUES?
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,218
Reaction score
9,911
Points
900
Location
Western Lands
If we are truly free to politically choose, then we are free to keep our individual political choices, whether they be candidates and/or issues to ourselves!
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,218
Reaction score
9,911
Points
900
Location
Western Lands

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


I retired from the US Army a year ago. When I joined up under the Delayed Entry Program in 1988 I was vetted to a degree, but I recall no questions about my political leanings—but how many fifteen year old kids really possess set in stone ideological beliefs? I was vetted again around 1992 when I was permanently attached to the 312th Military Intelligence Battalion and put on a long range surveillance detachment. Again, no questions were asked about which American political party I affiliated with, although there were questions about whether or not I was a communist or had been associated with the American communist party. Seems Russian agents had been caught trying to get their hands on phone books for the Army base where I was serving.

Over the course of the following two decades I would be vetted for various security clearances a number of times, most memorably after the events of 9/11/01. However, I cannot remember a single US Army background investigation which wanted to know my American political party affiliation, although I did receive a letter once from the Pentagon written entirely in Arabic, which turned out to be a test of sorts, to verify whether or not I could read and understand that language enough to respond, which I could and I did.

I can also report the same thing about background vetting for federal law enforcement. Yes, they did go door to door through neighborhoods where I had grown up asking questions about me and my family and they did indeed speak at length with a number of my public school teachers and college professors, but they never wanted to know whether I was a democrat or republican. That particular initial background investigation occurred around 2005, so social media popularity was well in force by that time. No background investigator ever asked for explanation of my ideological beliefs or means to see what I might have been writing about online, although they did check my Facebook and Gmail accounts for security risks—to see if criminal or foreign elements had infiltrated either account.

What we're witnessing here in 2021 is unprecedented and clear discrimination against law enforcement and military service applicants—and even already serving members of both—based on their political beliefs, racial appearance, and religious backgrounds. As a veteran of both the military and law enforcement I find it to be utterly sickening. The only reason for it, as others have said, is to identify and purge from service any applicant or active duty member whose political beliefs clash with modern Democratic Party ideology—and it needs to STOP or be stopped. Now.
Thank you for sharing this. I felt there were reasons why you are one of the smarter members on this board!
Nothing beats awareness combined with experience.
 

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
29,602
Reaction score
17,252
Points
1,415

Democrat Stephanie Murphy Pushes Legislation to Ban Anyone Who Participated in “Stop the Steal” Activities and Anyone in Q-Anon from Holding a Security Clearance or Joining Military


"Leading House Democrat Stephanie Murphy proposed in 2020 to end tariffs on Chinese imports amid the spread of Wuhan Virus, essentially rewarding the Chinese for their secretive and problematic handling of the virus that is quickly spreading to all corners of the globe.

This was in March before the China virus ravaged the nation."


NOW she's out to PURGE Conservatives and Trump supporters:

"On Friday Rep. Stephanie Murphy pushed legislation that will bar Q-Anon supporters and anyone who participated in “Stop the Steal” activities from from holding office in the public sector or joining the military.

The media tells us Murphy is a “moderate” Democrat."


Yeah, uh huh......


Of course she wants the same for anyone associated with ANTIFABLM.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top