Public Employees in Texas Who Issue Gay Marriage Licenses Are in for a Major Punishment if This Bill

[Skylar]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. Meanwhile, gays and lesbians will keep getting married.

Sounds like a win-win to me.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. ....

Is there a reason that one should NOT believe Natural law?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Well sure ya can... That's how Republics work. The Legislature decides what is spent where and they have exclusive authority over how that is done. (That's why it was SO important for the Progressives in the GOP to pass the Cromnibus last year.... to fund obamacare out for a full year. If they had not, the new congress would have just stopped paying for that. See how that works?)

No, it would not hold. Federal law mandates that people be compensated by their employers for work. This would be a legislative action by the state contradicting federal law, and thus violate the supremacy clause.

Yeah, you can fire an employee. But you can't deprive them of a wage.

OH! There's bad news here... firing an employee, IS 'denying them a wage'.

Texas is simply getting out in front of 'Discrimination' lawsuits.

Turns out that someone in the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality, let a handbook slip out of the coven... so, well... you see how it is.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. ....

Is there a reason that one should NOT believe Natural law?

Probably because that is as made up as any other law. Natural law is a human idea. Nature's law we couldn't begin to understand, and in nature being homosexual is "normal" for a small percentage of many populations, meaning you just fucked yourself.

 

[Skylar]

Well sure ya can... That's how Republics work. The Legislature decides what is spent where and they have exclusive authority over how that is done. (That's why it was SO important for the Progressives in the GOP to pass the Cromnibus last year.... to fund obamacare out for a full year. If they had not, the new congress would have just stopped paying for that. See how that works?)

No, it would not hold. Federal law mandates that people be compensated by their employers for work. This would be a legislative action by the state contradicting federal law, and thus violate the supremacy clause.

Yeah, you can fire an employee. But you can't deprive them of a wage.

OH! There's bad news here... firing an employee, IS 'denying them a wage'.

But the law doesn't call for them to be fired. Only stripped of their wages. Which, as we've established, is unconstitutional.

You claim that Texas is aware of this. There's zero indication of this awareness in anything you've posted.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. Meanwhile, gays and lesbians will keep getting married.

Sounds like a win-win to me.

You mean pretend to be married.
Leaving God completely out of this,nature alone says it's a sham.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Is there a reason that one should NOT believe Natural law?

Probably because that is as made up as any other law.

That is made up of human physiology... which represents the human sexuality standard.

Natural law is a human idea. [/quote]

Natural Law is the laws which govern nature. That humanity has managed to observe the law, doesn't actually mean that we came up with it... or that we have some control over it.

LOL! You people are truly helpless.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. Meanwhile, gays and lesbians will keep getting married.

Sounds like a win-win to me.

You mean pretend to be married.
Leaving God completely out of this,nature alone says it's a sham.

And a swing and a miss, a big one since you are dead wrong.

 

[Skylar]

People are still fighting gay marriage? Why are they wasting their time?

Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.

And you keep believing that. ....

Is there a reason that one should NOT believe Natural law?

More accurately, we don't accept that you define natural law. And since there's no marriage in nature, its irrelevant to the Texas laws.

C'mon, Keyes. We've done this dance before. You always lose.....because all you can offer us are obtuse 'Appeals to Authority'. Where you claim to speak for 'nature', or 'god', or 'objective truth'. When in reality, its just you. Citing yourself.

And you're nobody.

 

[Dot Com]

And whall we at it, we heah bah declahuh awl marges must be betwixt too peoples of the same race. YEEEEEEE-HAAWWWWWWW!!!

ROFL!

Delusion is SO cool to see when its expressed in writing!

Now let's follow the reasoning here...

Because people who of distinct races can be married, that AXIOMATICALLY means that marriage can have absolutely NO Standards. Mom's can marry daughters, Dad's can wed their sons... An entire city block can betroth itself to one another and join in marriage, all 557 of 'em.

And all because a black guy fell in love with a white girl and wanted to marry her and someone said... 'why not?'.

Hysterical...

project much? BTW- where is your law degree from?

 

[NLT]

TexAss. Big government at its worst.

Ravi Your state, Floridia is just like Texas only with more crazy people, and more beaches.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

But the law doesn't call for them to be fired. Only stripped of their wages.

Yep... no discrimination there. Only enforcement of Texas law, which the Texas Legislature is well within their legitimate scope of power to determine.

Now, the lawsuit which comes... will need to challenge which is more important: The means of a legislature to govern, or the needs of the sexually abnormal to feel better about themselves, through the undermining of a free people to govern themselves.

Pretty cool, huh... take a guess which way that one goes.

 

[Dot Com]

Well sure ya can... That's how Republics work. The Legislature decides what is spent where and they have exclusive authority over how that is done. (That's why it was SO important for the Progressives in the GOP to pass the Cromnibus last year.... to fund obamacare out for a full year. If they had not, the new congress would have just stopped paying for that. See how that works?)

No, it would not hold. Federal law mandates that people be compensated by their employers for work. This would be a legislative action by the state contradicting federal law, and thus violate the supremacy clause.

Yes it would.

It doesn't seem like you quite see what's happening here. Texas is telling the US Judiciary to stick it where the sun don't shine. And that Texas Progressives should go find a job other than Texas Government... .

It's amazing how quickly, under those circumstances, that Progressivism dries right up, isn't it?

Before long Texas will be a purple state then blue.

 

[Skylar]

Is there a reason that one should NOT believe Natural law?

Probably because that is as made up as any other law.

That is made up of human physiology... which represents the human sexuality standard.

Nature has *******. It doesn't have marriage. Marriage is our invention. Thus, any 'natural law' appeals to authority fallacies you want to offer us are DOA. As the premise of your reasoning is already fallacious.

Natural Law is the laws which govern nature. That humanity has managed to observe the law, doesn't actually mean that we came up with it... or that we have some control over it.

Sorry, Keyes....no one accepts you as speaking for 'Nature'. If your arguments worked rationally, logically, or by the evidence, you wouldn't have to lean so heavily on fallacies. There is no marriage in nature. There is ******* in nature.

Rendering any argument based on 'marriage in nature' just another poorly thought through piece of rhetorical flotsam that you'll abandon again like you have so many times before.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

And whall we at it, we heah bah declahuh awl marges must be betwixt too peoples of the same race. YEEEEEEE-HAAWWWWWWW!!!

ROFL!

Delusion is SO cool to see when its expressed in writing!

Now let's follow the reasoning here...

Because people who of distinct races can be married, that AXIOMATICALLY means that marriage can have absolutely NO Standards. Mom's can marry daughters, Dad's can wed their sons... An entire city block can betroth itself to one another and join in marriage, all 557 of 'em.

And all because a black guy fell in love with a white girl and wanted to marry her and someone said... 'why not?'.

Hysterical...

project much? BTW- where is your law degree from?

ROFLMNAO!

(Apparently I've stumbled into some Leftist Heresy! Apparently only the High Priests of "The Law" can comment upon the sacred legalities as defined by the scrolls... .

Who wants in on the pool which bets on how long before "DENIER!" is trotted out?)

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Nature has *******. It doesn't have marriage.

Nature has a physiological design wherein two complimenting but otherwise distinct genders... . Thus establishing the law wherein Marriage requires the joining of one man and one woman.

 

[Skylar]

But the law doesn't call for them to be fired. Only stripped of their wages.

Yep... no discrimination there. Only enforcement of Texas law, which the Texas Legislature is well within their legitimate scope of power to determine.

Federal law mandates that if you work, you be paid a wage. Thus, any statute passed by Texas that mandates you work for no wage is unconstitutional. As it violates the supremacy clause.

You insist that Texas is already aware their statute is unconstitutional. And there's nothing in any quote you've offered that demonstrates that degree of self awareness.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Well sure ya can... That's how Republics work. The Legislature decides what is spent where and they have exclusive authority over how that is done. (That's why it was SO important for the Progressives in the GOP to pass the Cromnibus last year.... to fund obamacare out for a full year. If they had not, the new congress would have just stopped paying for that. See how that works?)

No, it would not hold. Federal law mandates that people be compensated by their employers for work. This would be a legislative action by the state contradicting federal law, and thus violate the supremacy clause.

Yes it would.

It doesn't seem like you quite see what's happening here. Texas is telling the US Judiciary to stick it where the sun don't shine. And that Texas Progressives should go find a job other than Texas Government... .

It's amazing how quickly, under those circumstances, that Progressivism dries right up, isn't it?

Before long Texas will be a purple state then blue.

One brown baby and dead old ****** at a time. It looks like a supply and demand chart, one line up and one line down. They should cross in a generation.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Natural Law is the laws which govern nature. That humanity has managed to observe the law, doesn't actually mean that we came up with it... or that we have some control over it.

Sorry, Keyes....no one accepts you as speaking for 'Nature'.

WoW! two pages in and you're already running for the appeal to popularity Lifeboat?


ROFLMNAO! Hysterical!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nature has *******. It doesn't have marriage.

Nature has a physiological design wherein two complimenting but otherwise distinct genders... . Thus establishing the law wherein Marriage requires the joining of one man and one woman.

That's not nature, and especially not for human beings, who can **** just anything and sometimes do.