JohnDB
Platinum Member
- Jun 16, 2021
- 12,875
- 8,946
- 1,138
None of what you have said is even remotely true.Is that what you think? Kyle, as you so lovingly and grovingly call him, was the only criminal on the street that night. A trespasser from another state, illegally in possession of a firearm, illegally brandishing it, at the citizens of that neighborhood he was trespassing in.
Every one of those citizens that went after him, were legally, and heroically trying to stop an armed criminal from continuing a rampage of armed violence in their neighborhood. Even one of the citizens that was armed didn't want to kill him, and testified under oath to that fact.
It isn't self defense when a murderer is murdering those trying to stop him from committing murder.
If by some chance he is acquitted, the ATF should arrest him for crossing a state line, and obtaining a firearm by straw purchase, in the furtherance of a felony.
Lets see if a jury in a federal court in Illinois is as sympathetic as a rigged jury, with a rigged judge in a state court in Wisconsin.
Rittenhouse was not in illegal possession of a firearm as the judge has already ruled.
The firearm was not transported across state lines. It was not a straw purchase.
Kyle was not only eligible for a firearm permit in Illinois it had been applied for and delayed because of quarantines... otherwise he would have actually had one.