Prosecution Knows It Has Lost, Now Trying To Add Lesser Charges To Avoid Total Loss

[M14 Shooter]

Yes. It is 100% false. Closing arguments were excellent.. After Rittenhouse killed the first unarmed guy, the others were trying to stop an active shooter without shooting him.

If Rittemhouse was a threat as an active shooter, WI law requires they retrreat from him before they can use any sort of force against him.
They didn't. They chased after him. They became the threat.
So.... No.

 

[surada]

Fuck off, Shithead...

Did you watch closing arguments? You should..

 

[surada]

If Rittemhouse was a threat as an active shooter, WI law requires they retrreat from him before they can use any sort of force against him.
They didn't. They chased after him. They became the threat.
So.... No.

Listen to the closing arguement and watch the action one frame at a time. You can't provoke an incident and claim self defense.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Did you watch closing arguments? You should..

Bits and piecs on You Tube. Believe it or not, my world's not centered on this case...

 

[M14 Shooter]

Listen to the closing arguement and watch the action one frame at a time. You can't provoke an incident and claim self defense.

Good to see you agree the "active shooter" line is a bunch of hooey.

The part you didnt hear the prosecutor say - because he didn't mention it - is even if you provoke a confrontation, as soon a syou retreat, your right to self defense resents. Says so right in the law.

2) Provocation affects the privilege of self-defense as follows:
(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.

Kyle ran. Disengaged. Self-defense regained.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That's America's ambition. To set the bar so low on self defense claims that even Chauvin's murder in broad daylight with video and several witnesses, can be allowed to happen.

What happened to Chauvin again?

Your entire post is an exercise in contradictions.

 

[Donald H]

What happened to Chauvin again?

Your entire post is an exercise in contradictions.

Yes, you're right that I should have said, 'set the bar on self defense so low...........'

The extreme right's goal is to be able to murder black people as legitimately as was permitted in the 50's and 60's.
And this time include their fellow white Americans who they visualize as communists or socialists.

Will the end to all the Trumper madness be a world war with Russia and China? It's become a situation in which there are few ways out and back to something near normal for the US.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The extreme right's goal is to be able to murder black people as legitimately as was permitted in the 50's and 60's.

Please demonstrate your rational basis for this outright lie.

And this time include their fellow white Americans who they visualize as communists or socialists.

Please demonstrate your rational basis for this outright lie.

 

[Donald H]

Please demonstrate your rational basis for this outright lie.

Please demonstrate your rational basis for this outright lie.

Instead of accusing me of lying, all you need do is state that you disagree. Unfortunately, due to your behaviour on this forum I've had to make that the prerequisite with you. I'm simply not willing to tolerate any lying accusations from you! As follows:

I disagree: (followed by that on which you are disagreeing.)

 

[M14 Shooter]

Instead of accusing me of lying, all you need do is state that you disagree.

There's no accusation involved - you know the statements you made are not true.
Inherent in this is the disagreement with those statements

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes, you're right that I should have said, 'set the bar on self defense so low...........'

The extreme right's goal is to be able to murder black people as legitimately as was permitted in the 50's and 60's.
And this time include their fellow white Americans who they visualize as communists or socialists.

Will the end to all the Trumper madness be a world war with Russia and China? It's become a situation in which there are few ways out and back to something near normal for the US.

The extreme right is a handful of people and the Rittenhouse trial has nothing to do with them

 

[Donald H]

The extreme right is a handful of people and the Rittenhouse trial has nothing to do with them

Of course you know that I disagree.

 

[Delldude]

Each state has varying laws as to Gun Possession.The AR-15 was not owned by
Rittenhouse but a friend.As long as that Friend was not a minor he could
according to Wisconsin law loan his weapon { Rifle } out.
There's a lot of Hunting done in Wisconsin.
Also Fishing { Ice Fishing } and Beer guzzling as seen in the popular
movie - Grumpy Old Men - { 1993 }
Keep in mind what Joe Biden as candidate said of Obama when running
for the Presidency in 2007/2008. " I guarantee you Barack Obama
ain't takin' my shotguns,so don't buy that malarkey."

Lets not forget: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."