Proof SCOTUS is corrupt.

[beautress]

Why corrupt, not simply politically bias and partisan?

Two approaches are so confusing to the daisy picking leftists. We can see their blindness in full swing. lmao

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And who says that the US Constitution is perfect and/or democratic?

Which is clearly in defiance of democracy- reflectivity ignores and overrules the peoples overall will.

And who says that the US Constitution is perfect and/or democratic?

You're free to amend it.

Which is clearly in defiance of democracy-

So what? That's what the Founders intended.

reflectivity ignores and overrules the peoples overall will.

Meh.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nice dance! Now, can you answer my question?

Joe is doing all he can do to protect the border?
That's awesome!
He should make a campaign commercial saying that.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The conservative majority of the Supreme Court is corrupt; a Court dominated by partisan conservative ideologues who have contempt for settled, accepted precedent and are inconsistent in their reckless, irresponsible, and wrongheaded rulings.

Conservatives are infamous for their hypocrisy.

Boohoo.
How's the crime and illegal alien situation in your area?

 

[Crepitus]

No, I’m agreeing with you. Cotus does indeed put the immigration on the federal government, but, that would mean sanctuary cities are illegal, since they are superseding the federal governments authority by bypassing immigration laws and harboring illegals, which violate said immigration laws.

Feel free to start that thread. Please don't derail this one.

 

[Crepitus]

If only there was no such a thing as political opposition!

If only!

When does the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich truly begin?

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Rules Colorado can't take trump off the ballot because thats federal'

But let's Texas set its own immigration policy, which is supposed to be federal.

^ Proof Creepy Tits is a simple-minded idiot.

 

[Kruska]

You seem to be under the delusion that the US is a democracy, when in reality it's a republic where the people of the States chose their representatives to the federal government. The States are the sovereign in our Republic, if enough of them decide, they have the constitutional power to change the makeup of the federal government with no input from the feds. See article 5..

If you would actually have read my posts, then you would be aware, that I am constantly stating: The USA is NOT a democratic country.
At most one can describe it as a "fake" democracy in comparison with e.g. Switzerland or an openly declared autocratic lead country.

However YOU are under the obvious delusion that a State-form designation - such as e.g. a Republic is automatically democratic.
The former Communist East-Germany was termed the GDR - German Democratic Republic, and Communist North Korea is termed the Peoples Republic of North Korea - especially in view of the founding of the USA - the term Republic simply implied that the USA wasn't a monarchy.

The only democratic "aspect" of the USA is, that the "people" vote their representative for Congress - the representation via the Senate is however undemocratic, since it ignores the overall population count of a state - but simply allocates 2 Senators to every state - regardless of a states population count. Whilst in e.g. Germany the equivalent of the US Senate delegates is represented by the factual population count of it's states.

Therefore the USA is NOT - a "true" democracy, but ironically since it's founding claims to defend democracy across the Globe, whenever it decides to go to war, or e.g. opposes Russia or e.g. China - the USA therefore is a hypocrite, if it claims to be a democratic Nation and/or claims to defend democracy across the Globe.

 

[Kruska]

Are you suggesting that anyone and everyone who wants to move here can do so freely?

But that was exactly the situation when the US constitution was written and enacted in 1787 !!

The worlds oldest written Constitution still in effect today - and that is your, aka the USA's biggest problem.

The issue is therefore to separate/review constitutional issues from a factual problem/situation. Which essentially would require for the Constitution to be changed/amended.
AFAIK the state of Texas had it's boundaries/borders subjected towards the Federal institutions - upon deciding to join the USA after losing it's war, having sided with the Confederates. As such DC Washington is in charge of ALL state borders and any laws pertaining to immigration.

The majority of Americans has voted for the Democrats in 2020 - thus acquitting towards the known policies of the Democrats. (that migrants both illegal and legal, are e.g. essential for the US economy and in view of the USA's obligation towards "humanity"). Independently there are countless "republican" owned companies that don't have a problem with hiring illegals - right up to the human scumbag himself.

The only ones in clear opposition are those declaring the election to have been rigged (without ever being able to prove it since 2020) And the representatives of the Senate (who represent an undemocratic gained majority) and are lead/inspired by the human scumbags rhetoric.

One therefore needs to differentiate between a "registered" illegal migrant, and an illegal migrant who bypassed registration.

Nowhere did I state, that senile Biden has no responsibility towards ensuring the safety of US citizens, via e.g. thoroughly screening every migrants background. However the State of Texas has no right to arrest and deport illegal immigrants - that have been allowed into the USA by Federal agencies - as such "registered" by US customs and Border protection.

As such IMO, any immigrant that "bypassed" Federal screening and/or the permission to enter the USA - can be arrested and deported by any state security organization. If that personal view of mine is in accordance with the constitution - you need to ask a constitution expert.

As for Germany - any migrant that has not been registered by the German Federal Border institutions - aka an illegal border crosser, (nowadays termed as "irregular migrant" logically can be arrested and deported by the e.g. Bavarian state and border police. (however once that illegal migrant has registered himself within Germany - he is allowed to remain till a court decides upon his "residency status"). Anyone residing in Germany without the necessary residence permit is required to leave the country (Section 50 (1) and (2) Residence Act).

The German SC ruled in 2018 that the Bavarian border police has no right to supersede the German Federal Border Police.

And keep in mind that the German Constitution was "dictated" by the USA in 1949, in reference to the US constitution.

What Germany's Merkel and Biden did was simply to allow millions of illegal migrants to be registered as legal migrants (advocating humanitarian and economic reasons) - and therefore to reside in Germany or e.g. the USA, legally.

And immigration laws in both Germany and the USA are subjected towards the Federal authorities and institutions, aka the Federal government and NOT state authorities or state governments. However the Free-state of Bavaria due to its "special rights" has the right to refuse an allocation of migrants forwarded by the Federal government. Therefore there are far fewer migrants in Bavaria then in other German states.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Feel free to start that thread. Please don't derail this one.

Uh, it’s relevant to THIS thread, since you are making assertion about immigration being a federal purview, then anyone superseding federal authority on this matter would be pertinent.

 

[ThisIsMe]

But that was exactly the situation when the US constitution was written and enacted in 1787 !!

The worlds oldest written Constitution still in effect today - and that is your, aka the USA's biggest problem.

The issue is therefore to separate/review constitutional issues from a factual problem/situation. Which essentially would require for the Constitution to be changed/amended.
AFAIK the state of Texas had it's boundaries/borders subjected towards the Federal institutions - upon deciding to join the USA after losing it's war, having sided with the Confederates. As such DC Washington is in charge of ALL state borders and any laws pertaining to immigration.

The majority of Americans has voted for the Democrats in 2020 - thus acquitting towards the known policies of the Democrats. (that migrants both illegal and legal, are e.g. essential for the US economy and in view of the USA's obligation towards "humanity"). Independently there are countless "republican" owned companies that don't have a problem with hiring illegals - right up to the human scumbag himself.

The only ones in clear opposition are those declaring the election to have been rigged (without ever being able to prove it since 2020) And the representatives of the Senate (who represent an undemocratic gained majority) and are lead/inspired by the human scumbags rhetoric.

One therefore needs to differentiate between a "registered" illegal migrant, and an illegal migrant who bypassed registration.

Nowhere did I state, that senile Biden has no responsibility towards ensuring the safety of US citizens, via e.g. thoroughly screening every migrants background. However the State of Texas has no right to arrest and deport illegal immigrants - that have been allowed into the USA by Federal agencies - as such "registered" by US customs and Border protection.

As such IMO, any immigrant that "bypassed" Federal screening and/or the permission to enter the USA - can be arrested and deported by any state security organization. If that personal view of mine is in accordance with the constitution - you need to ask a constitution expert.

As for Germany - any migrant that has not been registered by the German Federal Border institutions - aka an illegal border crosser, (nowadays termed as "irregular migrant" logically can be arrested and deported by the e.g. Bavarian state and border police. (however once that illegal migrant has registered himself within Germany - he is allowed to remain till a court decides upon his "residency status"). Anyone residing in Germany without the necessary residence permit is required to leave the country (Section 50 (1) and (2) Residence Act).

The German SC ruled in 2018 that the Bavarian border police has no right to supersede the German Federal Border Police.

And keep in mind that the German Constitution was "dictated" by the USA in 1949, in reference to the US constitution.

What Germany's Merkel and Biden did was simply to allow millions of illegal migrants to be registered as legal migrants (advocating humanitarian and economic reasons) - and therefore to reside in Germany or e.g. the USA, legally.

And immigration laws in both Germany and the USA are subjected towards the Federal authorities and institutions, aka the Federal government and NOT state authorities or state governments. However the Free-state of Bavaria due to its "special rights" has the right to refuse an allocation of migrants forwarded by the Federal government. Therefore there are far fewer migrants in Bavaria then in other German states.

and that is your, aka the USA's biggest problem.

Wait a second, you don’t even live in the United States??? facepalm. Nothing like being lectured about your own countries problems by someone who doesn’t even live here and has zero stake in the game.

How about this, if you are so eager to help them, why don’t you let us fly a couple hundred plane loads of them to YOUR country, sound good? At least then, you’d have some skin in the game.

 

[Kruska]

Wait a second, you don’t even live in the United States??? facepalm. Nothing like being lectured about your own countries problems by someone who doesn’t even live here and has zero stake in the game.

How about this, if you are so eager to help them, why don’t you let us fly a couple hundred plane loads of them to YOUR country, sound good? At least then, you’d have some skin in the game.

If your life would be so easy as to refute anything based on that post of yours - wouldn't that just be great?

And FYI - I have a PR for the USA, property and asset values in the USA and employ around 120 Americans - you little dummy you.

 

[ThisIsMe]

If your life would be so easy as to refute anything based on that post of yours - wouldn't that just be great?

And FYI - I have a PR for the USA, property and asset values in the USA and employ around 120 Americans - you little dummy you.

That makes no difference, do you LIVE here? If not, you have no skin in the game. It doesn’t affect you.

But let’s go back to your other post….

 

[Crepitus]

Uh, it’s relevant to THIS thread, since you are making assertion about immigration being a federal purview, then anyone superseding federal authority on this matter would be pertinent.

No, it's not. Back on topic please.

 

[ThisIsMe]

But that was exactly the situation when the US constitution was written and enacted in 1787 !!

The worlds oldest written Constitution still in effect today - and that is your, aka the USA's biggest problem.

The issue is therefore to separate/review constitutional issues from a factual problem/situation. Which essentially would require for the Constitution to be changed/amended.
AFAIK the state of Texas had it's boundaries/borders subjected towards the Federal institutions - upon deciding to join the USA after losing it's war, having sided with the Confederates. As such DC Washington is in charge of ALL state borders and any laws pertaining to immigration.

The majority of Americans has voted for the Democrats in 2020 - thus acquitting towards the known policies of the Democrats. (that migrants both illegal and legal, are e.g. essential for the US economy and in view of the USA's obligation towards "humanity"). Independently there are countless "republican" owned companies that don't have a problem with hiring illegals - right up to the human scumbag himself.

The only ones in clear opposition are those declaring the election to have been rigged (without ever being able to prove it since 2020) And the representatives of the Senate (who represent an undemocratic gained majority) and are lead/inspired by the human scumbags rhetoric.

One therefore needs to differentiate between a "registered" illegal migrant, and an illegal migrant who bypassed registration.

Nowhere did I state, that senile Biden has no responsibility towards ensuring the safety of US citizens, via e.g. thoroughly screening every migrants background. However the State of Texas has no right to arrest and deport illegal immigrants - that have been allowed into the USA by Federal agencies - as such "registered" by US customs and Border protection.

As such IMO, any immigrant that "bypassed" Federal screening and/or the permission to enter the USA - can be arrested and deported by any state security organization. If that personal view of mine is in accordance with the constitution - you need to ask a constitution expert.

As for Germany - any migrant that has not been registered by the German Federal Border institutions - aka an illegal border crosser, (nowadays termed as "irregular migrant" logically can be arrested and deported by the e.g. Bavarian state and border police. (however once that illegal migrant has registered himself within Germany - he is allowed to remain till a court decides upon his "residency status"). Anyone residing in Germany without the necessary residence permit is required to leave the country (Section 50 (1) and (2) Residence Act).

The German SC ruled in 2018 that the Bavarian border police has no right to supersede the German Federal Border Police.

And keep in mind that the German Constitution was "dictated" by the USA in 1949, in reference to the US constitution.

What Germany's Merkel and Biden did was simply to allow millions of illegal migrants to be registered as legal migrants (advocating humanitarian and economic reasons) - and therefore to reside in Germany or e.g. the USA, legally.

And immigration laws in both Germany and the USA are subjected towards the Federal authorities and institutions, aka the Federal government and NOT state authorities or state governments. However the Free-state of Bavaria due to its "special rights" has the right to refuse an allocation of migrants forwarded by the Federal government. Therefore there are far fewer migrants in Bavaria then in other German states.

The issue is therefore to separate/review constitutional issues from a factual problem/situation.

Our constitution mandates the federal government protect our borders from invasion. (25 million + illegal entries certianly qualifies as an invasion), it also allows Congress to make laws. Congress did make those laws, and some of those laws are immigration laws, making it unlawful to illegally cross our borders.

Which essentially would require for the Constitution to be changed/amended.

We have procedures for that…not going to happen.

As such DC Washington is in charge of ALL state borders and any laws pertaining to immigration.

Yep, no argument there. The problem is, our government has abdicated their responsibility in enforcing the borders and upholding immigration laws. States are now thumbing their nose at immigration laws and creating sanctuary cities, thus, they are breaking the law by harboring illegals.

Those illegals are commiting crimes. People have been raped and killed because of some of these illegals.

And let’s not even get into this new TikTok trend where illegals are providing information to other illegals on how to become squatters and take over other people’s property…yeah, that’s becoming a thing here.

The majority of Americans has voted for the Democrats in 2020 - thus acquitting towards the known policies of the Democrats

So? We don’t live under a democracy here. It’s not mob rule. Even still, if one side or the other are not enforcing the laws, then they are in the wrong.

both illegal and legal, are e.g. essential for the US economy and in view of the USA's obligation towards "humanity")

Let’s talk about that economy. Illegal immigration costs the US (taxpayers) 151 billion annually, and the contribute, what…20 billion? 30 billion from contributions to social security and state taxes? Seems to be a deficit, but the cost of the crimes that have occurred because of some of them (rapes and murders) cannot be monetized. Those people have to live with those horrors.

And, this claim about “well, the illegals do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do”, which is bs. SOME of them do, but they’ve been using that excuse for many years, and no matter how many millions of them we let cross, the story is all the same “we need them to do the jobs Americans won’t do”. It’s like a job quota that never seems to get filled. Why is that? It’s because they are not doing the jobs Americans won’t do, they are being released into the interior of the country, most of them, never to be seen again. That and/or they end up competing with citizen for jobs that Americans DO want, but I assure you, we don’t have 20 million illegals down in the southern U.S. picking lettuce.

One therefore needs to differentiate between a "registered" illegal migrant, and an illegal migrant who bypassed registration.

Huh? It doesn’t matter if you are registered or not, if you broke the laws of our country by illegally crossing our borders, you are here against the laws.

And you want to talk about “humanity”? How humane is it that Biden has the “welcome” sign posted down at the border, enticing those people to make that brutal trek across Mexico, in order to illegally enter the country, some of whom end up dying due to the trip, or they get trafficked by the cartels and extorted for thousands of dollars. Some of these cartel members get paid up to $40,000 per illegal trafficked. Who’s paying that???

Also, on top of all of that, you are sitting there…wherever you are, advocating that anyone who wants to should be able to just show up and enter our country…from anywhere. You realize that no country operates that way right? Every country has border control. Hell, mexicos immigration laws are actually stricter than our own. If you are not a Mexican citizen you have almost no rights in Mexico and if caught in Mexico illegally, you’ll be deported immediately. Every other country has laws to enforce their borders, but apparently you want the US to give up its borders for the rest of the world.

Sorry, but that’s now how being a sovereign nation works.

 

[dudmuck]

Our constitution mandates the federal government protect our borders from invasion. (25 million + illegal entries certianly qualifies as an invasion), it also allows Congress to make laws. Congress did make those laws, and some of those laws are immigration laws, making it unlawful to illegally cross our borders.



We have procedures for that…not going to happen.



Yep, no argument there. The problem is, our government has abdicated their responsibility in enforcing the borders and upholding immigration laws. States are now thumbing their nose at immigration laws and creating sanctuary cities, thus, they are breaking the law by harboring illegals.

Those illegals are commiting crimes. People have been raped and killed because of some of these illegals.

And let’s not even get into this new TikTok trend where illegals are providing information to other illegals on how to become squatters and take over other people’s property…yeah, that’s becoming a thing here.



So? We don’t live under a democracy here. It’s not mob rule. Even still, if one side or the other are not enforcing the laws, then they are in the wrong.



Let’s talk about that economy. Illegal immigration costs the US (taxpayers) 151 billion annually, and the contribute, what…20 billion? 30 billion from contributions to social security and state taxes? Seems to be a deficit, but the cost of the crimes that have occurred because of some of them (rapes and murders) cannot be monetized. Those people have to live with those horrors.

And, this claim about “well, the illegals do the jobs that Americans don’t want to do”, which is bs. SOME of them do, but they’ve been using that excuse for many years, and no matter how many millions of them we let cross, the story is all the same “we need them to do the jobs Americans won’t do”. It’s like a job quota that never seems to get filled. Why is that? It’s because they are not doing the jobs Americans won’t do, they are being released into the interior of the country, most of them, never to be seen again. That and/or they end up competing with citizen for jobs that Americans DO want, but I assure you, we don’t have 20 million illegals down in the southern U.S. picking lettuce.




Huh? It doesn’t matter if you are registered or not, if you broke the laws of our country by illegally crossing our borders, you are here against the laws.

And you want to talk about “humanity”? How humane is it that Biden has the “welcome” sign posted down at the border, enticing those people to make that brutal trek across Mexico, in order to illegally enter the country, some of whom end up dying due to the trip, or they get trafficked by the cartels and extorted for thousands of dollars. Some of these cartel members get paid up to $40,000 per illegal trafficked. Who’s paying that???

Also, on top of all of that, you are sitting there…wherever you are, advocating that anyone who wants to should be able to just show up and enter our country…from anywhere. You realize that no country operates that way right? Every country has border control. Hell, mexicos immigration laws are actually stricter than our own. If you are not a Mexican citizen you have almost no rights in Mexico and if caught in Mexico illegally, you’ll be deported immediately. Every other country has laws to enforce their borders, but apparently you want the US to give up its borders for the rest of the world.

Sorry, but that’s now how being a sovereign nation works.

the apprehension rate is now 92%, and it was 79% the past two years. Thats much higher than its ever been.

 

[ThisIsMe]

the apprehension rate is now 92%, and it was 79% the past two years. Thats much higher than its ever been.

Yeah…just like Biden is suddenly FOR a border wall now. OF COURSE apprehensions are up, we’re heading into election season and Biden needs some data to show he’s “tough on immigration”. Funny how he just recently had an epiphany on immigration huh? Of course, that also completely ignores the fact that he’s now flying them across the border directly into the U.S., bypassing the border.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Oh FFS, the minions have all jumped on the crazy train.

The gaslighting is jumping the shark.

Soon the WEF will deem these shills and bots ineffective and move to remove Americans access to sites like this.

Democrats = WEF

 

[Rogue AI]

The sovereign states have always had the right to protect themselves. Especially if the corrupt and incompetent federal government refuses to uphold their duty to the states.

 

[OKTexas]

If you would actually have read my posts, then you would be aware, that I am constantly stating: The USA is NOT a democratic country.
At most one can describe it as a "fake" democracy in comparison with e.g. Switzerland or an openly declared autocratic lead country.

However YOU are under the obvious delusion that a State-form designation - such as e.g. a Republic is automatically democratic.
The former Communist East-Germany was termed the GDR - German Democratic Republic, and Communist North Korea is termed the Peoples Republic of North Korea - especially in view of the founding of the USA - the term Republic simply implied that the USA wasn't a monarchy.

The only democratic "aspect" of the USA is, that the "people" vote their representative for Congress - the representation via the Senate is however undemocratic, since it ignores the overall population count of a state - but simply allocates 2 Senators to every state - regardless of a states population count. Whilst in e.g. Germany the equivalent of the US Senate delegates is represented by the factual population count of it's states.

Therefore the USA is NOT - a "true" democracy, but ironically since it's founding claims to defend democracy across the Globe, whenever it decides to go to war, or e.g. opposes Russia or e.g. China - the USA therefore is a hypocrite, if it claims to be a democratic Nation and/or claims to defend democracy across the Globe.

Child if you had any knowledge about the people who wrote the Constitution you'd know our bicameral Congress was very intentional. The House of Representatives, the lower chamber was called the peoples house, the Senate, the upper chamber, the States house. Senators were originally selected by the State legislatures, there was no popular State vote for the Senate. That changed with the 17th Amendment in 1913, the 17th was a huge mistake in my opinion. However the 17th did not alter the purpose of the Senate, they are still there to represent the States. And every State gets two, regardless of population. If you remember nothing else, in the US, democracy ends at the State lines. The people of the States send their reps to congress and the States elect the President and VP through the Electoral College.

Also, I could care less what buzzwords people might use for political purposes. But don't try to gaslight me on the Constitution.

.